Property Right - Judgment Search Results

Criterion Properties Plc (Appellants) Vs. Stratford Uk Properties Llc ...

Court: House of Lords

1998 Criterion and Oaktree agreed to form a limited partnership together for the purpose of investing in real property in the United Kingdom. It was contemplated that the bulk of the funding would be provided by Oaktree … understand some of Criterion's objections to the SSA it is necessary to understand, in broad terms, the respective rights of Criterion and Oaktree under clause 7 of the ISA. 12. Clause 7 provided a mechanism for the

Fort Properties Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1993)115CTR(Bom)355; [1994]208ITR232(Bom)

and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified that the purchase and sale of Fort property in the hands of the assessee-company was a purchase and sale of capital asset and the assessee-company was, … gains for the assessment year 1968-69 and enhance the income of that year 4. Whether the Tribunal was right in holding that the Appellate Assistant Commissioner was not justified in entertaining the ground against the levy of

Amby Properties Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (2000)3CALLT31(HC)

respondent No. 1 (writ petitioner) who will hold the key as a Special Officer and shall keep the property as it is subject to the decision in the above appeal and shall not encumber, transfer and/or dispose … of section 3 of West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948 (West Bengal Act-II of 1948) has rightly been quashed by the learned single Judge. The other appeal arises out of an order dated 13.3.99 passed

Dankha Devi Agarwal (Dead) Throurgh Lrs. Vs. Tara Properties Pvt. Limi ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2006SC3068; [2006]133CompCas236(SC); (2006)5CompLJ409(SC); 2006(8)SCALE101; (2006)7SCC382

Daily Statesman, it came to light that the tax liability of the company in so far as the property leased to the company was concerned was to the tune of Rs. 23,06,748/- which was outstanding. On coming … and 3 from transferring or otherwise dealing with the shares in question and also from exercising any voting right or from receiving dividends in respect of the said 1650 shares. 6. Bhagirath Agarwal filed a Company Petition

Sugrabai Alibhai and Others Vs. Amtee Properties Pvt. Ltd. and Others

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1984]55CompCas734(Bom)

issued shares of the company. The business of the company consists of management and dealing in certain immovable properties in Bombay.3. The petitioners have challenged the right of respondents Nos. 2 to 8 to obtain inspection of

M/S. Atma Ram Properties (P) Ltd. Vs. M/S. Pal Properties (India) Pvt. ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2001VIIAD(Delhi)131; 63(2001)DLT694b; 2002(62)DRJ623

ORDERA.K. Sikri, J. 1. The plaintiff has filed this Suit for recovery of possession of the property which is a showroom and bears Municipal No. H-72, Connaught Circus, New Delhi (hereinafter to be called as … of defendant No. 1 at a monthly rent of Rs. 24,701.75 paise and, thereforee, the plaintiff has no right to file any such suit. The plaintiff filed replications to both the written statements controverting the various pleas

Hosur Kasipathy, Ex. Property Guardian of the Minors Mutchala Kesava R ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1950Mad506

ORDERKrishnaswami Nayudu, J.1. The guardian of the property of the minors is the petitioner in this civil revision petition. By an order of the District Judge,

Nevada Properties Pvt. Ltd. Through Its Director Ltd. Vs. The State of ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

in relation to an order under section 453. (4) No order made under this section shall prejudice any right or interest to or in such immovable property which any person may be able to establish in a … of Judicature at Bombay dated November 29, 2010 wherein the majority judgment has held that the expression ‘any property’ used in sub-section (1) of Section 102 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as

Esteem Properties P.ltd. Vs. Chetan Kamble .

Court: Supreme Court of India

in holding that the petitioner are in possession of land before C.T.S. No.229 and it is their private property.” 29……….. ORDER The revision petition is allowed, Order of all authorities below are set aside, I hold and … the Bombay High Court in a Public Interest Litigation, being PIL No.47 of 2008.2. The matter pertains to rights and ownership over the subject land admeasuring 5 acres and 20 gunthas in CTS1No.229 (in short ‘subject land’).

Property Owners Association Vs. State Of Maharashtra .

Court: Supreme Court of India

b. The interpretation amounts to endorsing a particular economic ideology 180 c. The interpretation is incompatible with the right to property .................... 184 d. Determining the ‘materiality’ and ‘community element’ of the resource ... 186 e. The … Reportable 2024 INSC835IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.1012 of 2002 Property Owners Association & Ors. …Appellants Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Respondents With SLP(C) No.5777 of 1992 With