Property Right - Judgment Search Results

Criterion Properties Plc (Appellants) Vs. Stratford Uk Properties Llc ...

Court: House of Lords

judgment made in an action in which the appellant, Criterion Properties plc (Criterion), is seeking to establish that an agreement into it is necessary to understand, in broad terms, the respective rights of Criterion and Oaktree under clause 7 of the ISA.

Fort Properties Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1993)115CTR(Bom)355; [1994]208ITR232(Bom)

contention was that the income from the sale of the property had rightly been held to be taxable as capital gains that the income from the sale of the property had rightly been held to be taxable as capital gains in the

Amby Properties Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (2000)3CALLT31(HC)

the key as a Special Officer and shall keep the property as it is subject to the decision in the above and Acquisition) Act, 1948 (West Bengal Act-II of 1948) has rightly been quashed by the learned single Judge. The other appeal

Dankha Devi Agarwal (Dead) Throurgh Lrs. Vs. Tara Properties Pvt. Limi ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2006SC3068; [2006]133CompCas236(SC); (2006)5CompLJ409(SC); 2006(8)SCALE101; (2006)7SCC382

3) is the wife of the respondent No. 2. Tara Properties Private Limited and three others are the appellants in Civil the shares in question and also from exercising any voting right or from receiving dividends in respect of the said 1650

Sugrabai Alibhai and Others Vs. Amtee Properties Pvt. Ltd. and Others

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1984]55CompCas734(Bom)

the company consists of management and dealing in certain immovable properties in Bombay.3. The petitioners have challenged the right of respondents certain immovable properties in Bombay.3. The petitioners have challenged the right of respondents Nos. 2 to 8 to obtain inspection of

Hansalaya Properties Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (1983)4ITD475(Delhi)

situated on 15, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi shall be the property of the firm and as taken in the wealth-tax return is concerned was Rs. 2,01,000. The firm would have the right to revalue the property only if the property were taken

Patsons Properties (P.) Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1991)37ITD115(Mum.)

a transfer of property and cannot be defined as the property having been let out on an annual rent. The appellant's it a sale, exchange or relinquishment or extinguishment of any rights or compulsory acquisition relate to immovable property. Any one of

Atma Ram Properties (P) Ltd. Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (2006)102TTJ(Delhi)345

property was only a normal feature of exploitation of the property as owner and was in no sense a business activity owner of the property but they were, holding the leasehold rights of the subject property and considering that the liability to

Hill Properties Ltd. the Companies Act, 1956 Vs. Union Bank of India U ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2009(111)BomLR4550

date, in the possession of the defaulter as his own property and not on account of any other person, or was institute a suit in the Civil Court to establish the right which he claims in the property in dispute, but subject

Property and Finance Private Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1991KAR315

was an adhoc ex gratia grant in respect of the properties lost by the petitioners in Pakistan. Again on 7.2.1978, the such a negotiation even subsequently also. In these circumstances, the right of the petitioners to claim compensation from the Pakistan Government