Property Limitation - Judgment Search Results

Moody Properties Limited and Anr. Vs. Cesc Limited and Ors.

Court: Kolkata

of Moody Properties Limited. It appears to be a family company of the Modis. This company owns the property numbered as premises No.8A, Middleton Street, Kolkata-700 071. This is a four storeyed building. A private limited company … IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side W.P.No.1227 of 2015 Moody Properties Limited & Anr. versus CESC Limited & ORS.For the petitioner:- Mr.Sabyasachi Choudhury Mr.Rajarshi Dutta Mr.Sayantan Bose Ms.Sreemoyee Purokayastha …Advocates

Maytas Properties Limited, Rep. by Its a Vs. A.P. State Consumer Dispu ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

of the Companies Act, 1956. It is stated that the said company is engaged in the business of property development and it had undertaken the development of a township called "The Hill County". The respondents in the … JUSTICE G. ROHINI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT PETITION Nos.2521OF 201.and Batch 07.02.2013 Maytas Properties Limited, rep. by its Authorized Signatory C. Nagaiah, Maytas Hill County, Bachupally, Miyapur, Hyderabad-500 072. A.P. State Consumer Disputes

Indian City Properties Limited Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax (Central ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1965]55ITR262(Cal)

proportionate remuneration payable to the managing agent in respect of their rendering services in relation to the aforesaid property was not allowable under section 9 of the Income-tax Act (4) Whether, in the assessment years 1953-54 and … K. C. SEN J. - Indian City Properties Limited, Calcutta, is the assessee. At it instance the following questions of law have been referred to this court

Kilburn Properties Limited Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bengal.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1949]17ITR134(Cal)

and 1942-43.The assessee is Kilburn Properties Limited, Calcutta; the only source of income of the company is house property.The assessable income of the company for 1941-42 was Rs. 34,772 and income-tax payable was Rs. 10,141-13-0 only leaving … definition of income in the Act and the words profits and gains are an application and not a limitation upon the word income', does not, out opinion, help the assessee in any way in the present case.

Grancy Property Limited Vs. Lancelot Lenono Manala and Others

Court: South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal

affairs of Seena Marena Investments (Pty) Ltd, in the light of the complaints made on behalf of Grancy Property Limited, is necessary and if so to conduct such an investigation. 3. The said independent directors may not … of Seena Marena Investments (Pty) Ltd, in the light of the complaints made on behalf of Grancy Property Limited, is necessary and if so to conduct such an investigation. 3. The said independent directors may not be

Grancy Property Limited and Another Vs. Seena Marena Investment (Pty) ...

Court: South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal

with leave of the court below. The underlying dispute between the parties relates to an entitlement of Grancy Property Limited and Montague Goldsmith AG in Liquidation (the appellants) to a proper statement of account by Seena Marena … leave of the court below. The underlying dispute between the parties relates to an entitlement of Grancy Property Limited and Montague Goldsmith AG in Liquidation (the appellants) to a proper statement of account by Seena Marena Investments

…petitioner Vs. Dalhousie Properties Limited

Court: Kolkata

their company has its registered office at 1 & 2, Humayan Place, Kolkata, and owns a very large property numbered as premises No.4, BBD Bag, Kolkata and known as “Stephen House”.. Now said 4, BBD Bag is … The Hon'ble Justice MIR DARA SHEKO G.A.No.546 of 2016 A.P.D. No.264 of 2015 C.S.No.223 of 2007 GLOBAL EXPORTS LIMITED …Petitioner -VersusDALHOUSIE PROPERTIES LIMITED …Respondent Mr. Abhrajit Mitra, Senior Advocate, Mr. Anirban Roy, Ms. Micky Chowdhury, Mr. Saptk

Kolkata Municipal Corporation Vs. Humayun Properties Limited

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 2008(3)CHN96

Matched in: Parties Kolkata Municipal Corporation Vs. Humayun Properties Limited

Fortune Financial Services (i) Limited.Vs. Golden Gate Properties Limi ...

Court: Karnataka

at Bangalore. The main objects of the Respondent company is to carry on business of Real Estate and property development in India and abroad. In the year 2004, the Respondent Company appointed the petitioner as its financial … that petitioner is entitled for its fee only upon successful completion of the transaction within the agreed time limit. Though Respondent Company is not liable to pay any amount they paid a sum of Rs.5 Crores under

Canara Bank Having Its H.O. Chennai Vs. Dewa Properties Limited (Previ ...

Court: Chennai

He further submitted that if at all the respondent/ landlord wants to engage an Engineer to inspect the property they will have to file an affidavit petition for appointment of Engineer to inspect the property. 3. According