Property Limitation - Judgment Search Results

Speaks Properties Limited vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

MONDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 14TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 14045 OF 2019 PETITIONER:SPEAKS PROPERTIES LIMITED M/S.SPEAKS PROPERTIES LIMITED, FORMELY (M/S. SYNTHITE PROPERTIES AND INVESTMENTS (P) LIMITED),HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT THEKKEKKARA MANSIONS 2ND … reconsideration of the order, which is the challenge in the writ petition filed by the owner of the property.3. In Exhibit P3 order, the State Government, even though set aside the order ofthe District Collector, has directed

Dewa Properties Limited vs the General Manager

Court: Kerala

OF THEORDER DATED 09/11/2020 IN R.C.P.NO.48 OF 2019 OF THE RENTCONTROL COURT (ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-IV), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/PETITIONER: M/S.DEWA PROPERTIES LIMITED ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI-600002, NOW REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR SHASHIKUMAR, AGED 56 YEARS, S/O. LATE MADHAVAN NAIR, 3, … THEORDER DATED 09/11/2020 IN R.C.P.NO.48 OF 2019 OF THE RENTCONTROL COURT (ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-IV), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/PETITIONER: M/S.DEWA PROPERTIES LIMITED ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI-600002, NOW REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR SHASHIKUMAR, AGED 56 YEARS, S/O. LATE MADHAVAN NAIR, 3, AVENUE

Godrej Properties Limited vs H K Susheelamma

Court: Karnataka

bySmt.H.K.Susheelamma, against her father, sister, brothers and defendants No.5 and 6 who have allegedly purchased the suit schedule property, with a prayer seeking partition and separate possession of 1/5th share in the suit schedule property and for … as settled out of Court. It was also contended that the suit is barred by the law of limitation, since admittedly the sale deed was executed by defendants No.1 and 2, through their Power of Attorney holder

Dewa Properties Limited vs the General Manager, Canara Bank

Court: Kerala

SRAVANA, 1943 R.C.A.NO.18/2020 OF THE RENT CONTROL APPELLATE COURT (DISTRICT COURT), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PETITIONER/RESPONDENT IN RCA 1/2020 : M/S.DEWA PROPERTIES LIMITED ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI-600 002, NOW REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, SHASHIKUMAR, AGED 56 YEARS, S/O. LATE MADHAVAN NAIR, … 1943 R.C.A.NO.18/2020 OF THE RENT CONTROL APPELLATE COURT (DISTRICT COURT), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PETITIONER/RESPONDENT IN RCA 1/2020 : M/S.DEWA PROPERTIES LIMITED ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI-600 002, NOW REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, SHASHIKUMAR, AGED 56 YEARS, S/O. LATE MADHAVAN NAIR, 3,

Dewa Properties Limited vs the General Manager

Court: Kerala

2020 / 2ND BHADRA, 1942 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN RCP 48/2019 OF RENT CONTROL COURT, TVM PETITIONER/S: M/S.DEWA PROPERTIES LIMITED ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI - 600002, NOW REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, SHIVAANI SHASHI, AGED 25, D/O. SHASHIKUMAR, 3 … / 2ND BHADRA, 1942 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN RCP 48/2019 OF RENT CONTROL COURT, TVM PETITIONER/S: M/S.DEWA PROPERTIES LIMITED ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI - 600002, NOW REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, SHIVAANI SHASHI, AGED 25, D/O. SHASHIKUMAR, 3 AVENUE

Moody Properties Limited and Anr. Vs. Cesc Limited and Ors.

Court: Kolkata

of Moody Properties Limited. It appears to be a family company of the Modis. This company owns the property numbered as premises No.8A, Middleton Street, Kolkata-700 071. This is a four storeyed building. A private limited company … IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side W.P.No.1227 of 2015 Moody Properties Limited & Anr. versus CESC Limited & ORS.For the petitioner:- Mr.Sabyasachi Choudhury Mr.Rajarshi Dutta Mr.Sayantan Bose Ms.Sreemoyee Purokayastha …Advocates

Maytas Properties Limited, Rep. by Its a Vs. A.P. State Consumer Dispu ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

of the Companies Act, 1956. It is stated that the said company is engaged in the business of property development and it had undertaken the development of a township called "The Hill County". The respondents in the … JUSTICE G. ROHINI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT PETITION Nos.2521OF 201.and Batch 07.02.2013 Maytas Properties Limited, rep. by its Authorized Signatory C. Nagaiah, Maytas Hill County, Bachupally, Miyapur, Hyderabad-500 072. A.P. State Consumer Disputes

Indian City Properties Limited Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax (Central ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1965]55ITR262(Cal)

proportionate remuneration payable to the managing agent in respect of their rendering services in relation to the aforesaid property was not allowable under section 9 of the Income-tax Act (4) Whether, in the assessment years 1953-54 and … K. C. SEN J. - Indian City Properties Limited, Calcutta, is the assessee. At it instance the following questions of law have been referred to this court

Kilburn Properties Limited Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bengal.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1949]17ITR134(Cal)

and 1942-43.The assessee is Kilburn Properties Limited, Calcutta; the only source of income of the company is house property.The assessable income of the company for 1941-42 was Rs. 34,772 and income-tax payable was Rs. 10,141-13-0 only leaving … definition of income in the Act and the words profits and gains are an application and not a limitation upon the word income', does not, out opinion, help the assessee in any way in the present case.

Grancy Property Limited Vs. Lancelot Lenono Manala and Others

Court: South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal

affairs of Seena Marena Investments (Pty) Ltd, in the light of the complaints made on behalf of Grancy Property Limited, is necessary and if so to conduct such an investigation. 3. The said independent directors may not … of Seena Marena Investments (Pty) Ltd, in the light of the complaints made on behalf of Grancy Property Limited, is necessary and if so to conduct such an investigation. 3. The said independent directors may not be