Property Company - Judgment Search Results
The Property Company (P) Ltd. versus Rohinten Daddy Mazda
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-07-2026
Reported in: [2026] 1 S.C.R. 227
[2026] 1 S.C.R. 227 : 2026 INSC 33 The Property Company (P) Ltd. v. Rohinten Daddy Mazda (Civil Appeal No. 92 of 2026) 07 January 2026 [J.B. Pardiwala* and … deemed to be a court for certain limited or specified purposes, such a legal[2026] 1 S.C.R. 229 The Property Company (P) Ltd. v. Rohinten Daddy Mazda fiction must not be extended beyond the purpose for which the fiction
The Property Company Ltd. Vs. Rohinten Daddy Mazda
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE BEFORE: THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN ACO No.91 of 2016 APO No.222 of 2016 THE PROPERTY COMPANY LTD.versus ROHINTEN DADDY MAZDA For the Petitioner : Mr.Jishnu Saha, Sr.Adv., Mr.Sanjib Kumar Mal, Adv., Mr.Dibanath Dey, Adv.For
Progress Property Company Limited (Appellant) Vs. Moorgarth Group Limi ...
Court: UK Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-08-2010
this appeal is whether there may have been an unlawful distribution of capital when the appellant company, Progress Property Company Ltd ("PPC"), sold the whole issued share capital of a wholly-owned subsidiary, YMS Properties (No. 1) Ltd ("YMS1") … way. PPC was originally called Tradegro (UK) Property Holdings Ltd and has since changed its name to BLN Property Company Ltd. Moorgarth was originally called Foldfree Ltd. But it is simplest to use the names used by Mummery
18-section briefs on any result in this list
R.S.i. Limited Vs. the Property Company Private Limited and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-24-2001
Reported in: (2001)3CALLT132(HC)
that at the time of induction in the year 1977, the respondent No. 1/opposite party No. 1, the Property Company Private Limited, gave express consent to the Chairman, D.S. Mazda of the appellant petitioner Company, and Mr. K.R. … for which the rent was tendered. The rent for the month of October 1998 was tendered to the Property Company, which also refused to accept the same. Being suspicious about the situation, an inquiry was made and it
London Diocesan Fund and Others (Respondents) Vs. Avonridge Property C ...
Court: House of Lords
Decided on: Dec-01-2005
to assist reading): 'The Landlord covenants with the Tenant as follows (but not, in the case of Avonridge Property Company Limited only, so as to be liable after the Landlord has disposed of its interest in the Property)
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free