Proof - Judgment Search Results

Rourkela Proofing Corporation Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Incom ...

Court: Orissa

Reported in: (2007)103CALLT88; (2007)207CTR(Ori)656

B.P. Das, J.1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dt. 17th Aug., 2000 passed by the Asstt. CIT, Rourkela Circle, Rourkela-OP No....

The Evidence of the Plaintiff in a Suit for Specific Vs. Jagjit Kaur

Court: Punjab and Haryana

CORUM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA Present: Mr.F.S.Virk, Advocate for the petitioner. *** RAJIV NARAIN RAINA, J The evidence of the plaintiff in a suit for specific performance of the agreement to sell was closed on 06.03.2013

from the Evidence Collected During the Trial or in the Enquiry That So ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRR No.271 of 2014 3 from the evidence collected during the trial or in the enquiry that some person, who is not arraigned as an accused

Bengal Water Proof Works (1940) Ltd. Vs. Ardeshir Jehangir Works

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1983(2)BomCR136

Matched in: Parties Bengal Water Proof Works (1940) Ltd. Vs. Ardeshir Jehangir Works

Kohinoor Proofing Industries Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2006)(111)ECC411

rely upon the Tribunal's order No.980/99-D dated 10.9.1999 in the case of CCE, Aurangabad v. Ratan Tarpaulin Water Proof Industries to support their claim for classification under Chapter Heading 52.06. However, as rightly pointed out by the

Flance Proof (Gears) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1998)(104)ELT652TriDel

Matched in: Parties Flance Proof (Gears) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Flame Proof Control Gears Pvt. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1999)(106)ELT368TriDel

Matched in: Parties Flame Proof Control Gears Pvt. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Uttar Pradesh State Bridge Cor Vs. Overseas Water Proofing Corpn.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: AIR2006Delhi211; 130(2006)DLT182

learned Judge has declined to waive costs imposed vide order dated 19.01.2006 and further has also closed plaintiff's evidence.3. It appears that vide order dated 19.01.2006 costs were imposed while granting the adjournment. Instead of complying with

Council of Scientific and Industrial Research Vs. Overseas Water Proof ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1994(1)ARBLR184(Delhi); 53(1994)DLT271

the Court while considering the objection cannot get into the question whether the arbitrator had rightly appreciated the evidence adduced by the parties - - Union of India, [1990]2SCR638 .(4) As regards the interest, it is now

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Leak Proof Engg (i) Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Matched in: Parties Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Leak Proof Engg (i) Pvt. Ltd.