Promiser - Judgment Search Results
Chimaka Promise Udenna@Angel vs Ncb
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 23.04.2026+ BAIL APPLN. 789/2026CHIMAKA PROMISE UDENNA@ ANGEL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Aggarwal, AdvocateversusNCB .....Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Khatri, SSC with Ms. Shelly Dixit,
Promising Exports Limited and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-23-2009
Reported in: 2009(168)LC253(Calcutta),2009(243)ELT3(Cal)
'Customs Act').2. It is to be noted that the writ petitions - i) W.P. No. 261 of 2008, Promising Exports Ltd. and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors. ii) W.P. No. 1161 of 2008, Indrajit Jash
Promises Instruments Pvt Ltd and anr Vs. Jt. Commissioner of Central E ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-08-2013
2013 APO.T.No.466 of 2013 W.P.No.1075 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE PROMISES INSTRUMENTS PVT LTD & ANR Versus JT. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KOLKATA-VI COMMISSIONERATE BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE GIRISH
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Promising Estate and Traders Pvt. Vs. Commr. of Customs, Calcutta
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Decided on: Jan-16-2002
Reported in: (2002)(141)ELT769Tri(Kol.)kata
1. By these appeals, the appellants have assailed the impugned order dated 20th July, 2001 passed by Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) confirming the order of the adjudicating authority on valuation of the impugned goods.2. The facts...
Promising Exports Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Salem
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Decided on: Mar-18-2011
1. Heard ld. SDR. No one is present for the appellants despite notice. The defect pointed out by the Registry has not yet been rectified. As such, the defective appeal is dismissed as not maintainable.
Gurumayum Rajatkanta Sharma @ Promise @ German Vs. District Magistrate ...
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: May-29-2008
result, the writ petition stands allowed. It is ordered that the writ petitioner, namely, Gurumayum Rajatkanta Sharma @ Promise @German shall be set at liberty forthwith, unless wanted in any other case. With the aforesaid direction, the
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free