Project - Judgment Search Results

Engineering Projects(india) Ltd vs.married Accommodation Project(dg Ma ...

Court: Delhi

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 1074/2012 Date of Decision :23. d May, 2019 ENGINEERING PROJECTS(INDIA) LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.J.P. Sengh, Sr. Adv. with Das, Mr.Manoj Mr.Deepak Kumar, Ms.Mrigna Shekhar & Mr.Zubin Sengh,

Modtech Projects (India) Private Limited vs.modtech Material Handling ...

Court: Delhi

DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:22. 11.2016 Judgment Pronounced On:19. 12.2016 CO.PET. 619/2016 IN THE MATTER OF:-"MODTECH PROJECTS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED ….PETITIONER/TRANSFEROR COMPANY AND MODTECH MATERIAL HANDLING PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED …..PETITIONER/TRANSFEREE COMPANY Through: Mr Manoj Kumar

Viraj Projects (I) Pvt Ltd vs M/S Durga Project Incorporations

Court: Karnataka

2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU WRIT PETITION NO. 21677 OF 2021 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: VIRAJ PROJECTS (I) PVT. LTD. HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT SY NO.211, BUNGALOW NO.6 NILANJALI SOCIETY, KALYANI NAGAR, PUNE - 411

Tata Projects Limited Vs. N.E.i. Projects (India) Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1991(1)ARBLR419(Delhi); 1991(20)DRJ379

the laws of England, having its registered office there, but also having office at New Delhi, and a project office at the site of the project in the District Sonebadra in the State of Uttar Pradesh. National

Director General of Married Accommodation Projects (Dgmap) vs Rds Proj ...

Court: Delhi

DELHIDate of Decision: 05.05.2026 + O.M.P. (COMM) 473/2024, I.A. 44506/2024 (Stay) & I.A. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF MARRIED ACCOMMODATION PROJECTS (DGMAP) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shashank Garg, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Hussain Taqvi, Senior Panel Counsel and Ms.

M/S. Kmv Projects vs the State Project Director

Court: Karnataka

BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM CIVIL MISC. PETITION NO. 261 OF 2024 BETWEEN:1. M/S. KMV PROJECTS NO. 8-3-948/949 LEVEL-4, SOLITAIRE PLAZA BESIDE IMAGE HOSPITAL AMEERPET, HYDERABAD-500 073. REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER SRI. TARANATH

Presteege Property Developers Rept. by Its Managaing Partner Mr. Deepa ...

Court: Karnataka

dated 01.04.1986. Due to their high quality construction, intrinsic quality, salesmanship, advertisement and the promptness in executing the projects, they claim that they have built vast reputation and goodwill in the market. It is further contended that

indus Engineering Co. a Sole Proprietary Firm Through Its Proprietor I ...

Court: Mumbai

to support Claim No.1. “The annexures to the counter claims testify to the fact that Respondents met their project requirement by placing orders on three firms at a higher cost, paid and claimed therein resulting in heavy

Edifice Developers and Project Engineers Ltd. Vs. Essar Projects (Indi ...

Court: Mumbai

Construction of the EOL township would make it clear that they applied to the entire Essar Oil refinery project. The expression 'project', it was submitted, was defined to mean the setting up of the 9 million tonne

indus Engineering Co. a Sole Proprietary Firm Through Its Proprietor I ...

Court: Mumbai

to support Claim No.1. “The annexures to the counter claims testify to the fact that Respondents met their project requirement by placing orders on three firms at a higher cost, paid and claimed therein resulting in heavy