Prohibiting - Judgment Search Results

Initiating Officer, Acit Benami Prohibition vs.appellate Tribunal Unde ...

Court: Delhi

DELHI Date of Decision:13. h September, 2019 + W.P.(C) 9841/2019 and CM APPL. 40695/2019 INITIATING OFFICER, ACIT BENAMI PROHIBITION..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Raghvendra Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Vipul Agrawal, Jr. Standing Counsel (M:99580. 5501). versus

The Prohibition and Excise Supdt., A.P. and ors. Vs. Toddy Tappers Coo ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT2003(9)SC178; (2004)3MLJ73(SC); 2003(9)SCALE643; (2003)12SCC738

A.C. Lakshmanan, J. 1. These appeals were filed by the Prohibition and Excise Superintendent of various divisions and districts of Andhra Pradesh against the final judgment dated 10.01.2003 of

Commissioner, Prohibition and Excise, A.P. and anr. Vs. Sharana Gouda

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT2007(9)SC329; 2007(8)SCALE439; (2007)6SCC42; 2007AIRSCW4095; (2007)3SCC(Cri)50; JT2007(9)SC329; 2007(1)LawHerald(SC)2062.

believe that such offence was being or was likely to be committed. At that stage there was a prohibition on confiscation if owner of the property in question had no reason to believe that such offence was

Prohibition and Excise Superintendent and anr. Vs. Toddy Tappers Co-op ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2009(5)ALT39

the respondent society in this regard vide its representation dated 27.06.1997 was rejected by the Assistant Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Hyderabad, by the order in Cr. No. B1/3401/96/P&E; dated 02.09.1997. The same was questioned by the

Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise and ors. Vs. Balaji Traders

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2006(6)ALD63

to their advantage.10. In the above backdrop, we shall now decide these appeals filled by the Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Andhra Pradesh, and two others for setting aside order dated 26-8-2003 passed by the learned Single

Prohibition and Excise Inspector Vs. Madaparthi Srinivasulu

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2004(2)ALD(Cri)366; 2004CriLJ3813

District. It is also the case of the prosecution that on 8-1-1999 at 10.45 a.m. P.W. 1, the Prohibition and Excise Inspector went with her staff to the scene of offence shop and while inspecting the said

Ramesh Vs. Prohibition and Excise Superintendent

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2005(1)ALD400; 2005(1)ALT401

Wines v. The Deputy Commissioner of Excise, Kakinada, 1995 (1) ALD 164 and Sunil v. Assistant Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise/Excise Superintendent, Twin Cities of Hyderabad, Narayanaguda, 1997 (4) ALD 625.3. Learned Government Pleader, on the other

Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise A.P., Hyderabad and ors. Vs. To ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2002(2)ALD379; 2002(2)ALT29

Ar. Lakshmanan, C.J. 1. Byconsent of both the parties the writ appeal istaken up for hearing and disposed of at the admission stage.2. This writ appeal is directed against a judgment dated 16th April, 2001 passed...

Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, A.P., Hyderabad Vs. White Hors ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2000(1)ALD739; 2000(1)ALT417

the Distillery Rules, a licensee is required to get the labels approved by the first respondent (Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise)before they are pasted on the bottles of liquor manufactured by the petitioner and for getting these

Superintendent, Prohibition and Excise, Bhimavaram, Eluru, W. G. Dist. ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1998(6)ALD204; 1998(5)ALT498

or cancelling a licence or permit.......' 16. In a more recent Bench decision in the Asst. Commissioner of Prohibition & Excise/Prohibition & Excise Supdt. RR District & Ors. v. M/s Jayadeep Wines, Gaddiannaram.W.A.Nos. 877 & 878 of