Prohibited - Judgment Search Results
Initiating Officer, Acit Benami Prohibition vs.appellate Tribunal Unde ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2019
W.P.(C) 9841/2019 and CM APPL. 40695/2019 INITIATING OFFICER, ACIT BENAMI PROHIBITION..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Raghvendra Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr.
The Prohibition and Excise Supdt., A.P. and ors. Vs. Toddy Tappers Coo ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-17-2003
Reported in: JT2003(9)SC178; (2004)3MLJ73(SC); 2003(9)SCALE643; (2003)12SCC738
A.C. Lakshmanan, J. 1. These appeals were filed by the Prohibition and Excise Superintendent of various divisions and districts of Andhra
Commissioner, Prohibition and Excise, A.P. and anr. Vs. Sharana Gouda
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jun-05-2007
Reported in: JT2007(9)SC329; 2007(8)SCALE439; (2007)6SCC42; 2007AIRSCW4095; (2007)3SCC(Cri)50; JT2007(9)SC329; 2007(1)LawHerald(SC)2062.
likely to be committed. At that stage there was a prohibition on confiscation if owner of the property in question had
Prohibition and Excise Superintendent and anr. Vs. Toddy Tappers Co-op ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-01-2009
Reported in: 2009(5)ALT39
representation dated 27.06.1997 was rejected by the Assistant Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Hyderabad, by the order in Cr. No. B1/3401/96/P&E;
Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise and ors. Vs. Balaji Traders
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-27-2006
Reported in: 2006(6)ALD63
District, Hyderabad, A.P. to Transport all kinds of goods except prohibited goods in tanker bearing No. AP9U 465.(2) Certificate of Insurance
Prohibition and Excise Inspector Vs. Madaparthi Srinivasulu
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-02-2004
Reported in: 2004(2)ALD(Cri)366; 2004CriLJ3813
prosecution that on 8-1-1999 at 10.45 a.m. P.W. 1, the Prohibition and Excise Inspector went with her staff to the scene
Ramesh Vs. Prohibition and Excise Superintendent
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-26-2004
Reported in: 2005(1)ALD400; 2005(1)ALT401
1995 (1) ALD 164 and Sunil v. Assistant Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise/Excise Superintendent, Twin Cities of Hyderabad, Narayanaguda, 1997 (4)
Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise A.P., Hyderabad and ors. Vs. To ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-21-2002
Reported in: 2002(2)ALD379; 2002(2)ALT29
Ar. Lakshmanan, C.J. 1. Byconsent of both the parties the writ appeal istaken up for hearing and disposed of at...
Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, A.P., Hyderabad Vs. White Hors ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-31-1999
Reported in: 2000(1)ALD739; 2000(1)ALT417
was inconsonance with the new excise policy as what is prohibited in the new excise policy is having new tie-up arrangement
Superintendent, Prohibition and Excise, Bhimavaram, Eluru, W. G. Dist. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-04-1998
Reported in: 1998(6)ALD204; 1998(5)ALT498
the society as a whole and it can even be prohibited the law as declared by the Supreme Court in the
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »