Procure - Judgment Search Results

Essar Procurement Services Ltd. Vs. Paramount Constructions

Court: Mumbai

1. By this petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short the said Act ), the petitioner has impugned the arbitral award dated 9th August 2011 made by the arbitral...

The Procurator, vs the Secretary,

Court: Kerala

THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 20TH CHAITHRA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 19172 OF 2023 PETITIONER/S: THE PROCURATOR, ARCHDIOCESE OF VERAPOLY, LATIN ARCHBISHOPS HOUSE, BROADWAY, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN, PIN - 682031BY ADVS. TONY GEORGE KANNANTHANAM L.ALOYSIUS THOMAS

The Procurator,R.C.Diocese of Calicut vs Corporation of Kozhikode & An ...

Court: Kerala

TUESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 31ST JYAISHTA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 270 OF 2011 PETITIONER: THE PROCURATOR, R.C.DIOCESE OF CALICUT, BISHOP'S HOUSE,, MALAPARAMBA, KOZHIKODE-673 009. BY ADVS. SRI.K.ABDUL JAWAD SMT.S.GIFFARA RESPONDENTS: 1 CORPORATION OF KOZHIKODE

E-Procurement Technologies Pt Ltd Vs. M/S C-1, India Pvt Ltd and Anr

Court: Delhi

and they are as under:“6. Whether or not any employee of the Plaintiff has compared the software "E procurement solution" with the software of the Defendant No.1 prior to filing of the present suit?. If yes, who

Procurator, Roman Catholic Diocese of Calicut Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR2003Ker143

Koshy, J. 1. In these three matters the question to-be decided is whether the enhanced Court-fees under the Kerala Court-Fees and Suits Valuation (Amendment) Ordinance, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as 'Ordinance') is applicable to appeals filed...

Mcgowan (Procurator Fiscal, Edinburgh) (Appellant) Vs. B (Respondent) ...

Court: UK Supreme Court

LORD HOPE 1. This is a reference of a devolution issue which has arisen in proceedings in the Sheriff Court of Lothian and Borders at Edinburgh. It was required by the Lord Advocate under paragraph 33...

Ravi G.Deshpande Vs The Procurator, The Coimbatore Diocese Society

Court: Chennai

Deshpande Res.at D.No.1635, Trichy Main Road, Sungam, Rep. by thier power of Attorney Agent, C.Sivakumar. ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Procurator, The Coimbatore Diocese Society Bishop House, Post Box No.6, 1260, Big Bazar Street, Coimbatore-641 001.2. The Commissioner, Coimbatore

M/S C-1 India Pvt Ltd Vs. E-procurement Technologies Ltd and anr

Court: Delhi

It also agreed that it shall not use any functional aspect of the “Electronic Tendering Module” and/or “Electronic Procurement Model” and the adaptation thereof in the form of internet based tendering system and/or internet based procurement system

Amiya Prosad Das Gupta Vs. Director of Procurement and Supply and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1956Cal114,59CWN959

this case are shortly as follows:2. The petitioner was appointed as Inspector-Assessor on 1-7-1951 by the Director of Procurement and Supply. On 25-8-1952 he was served with a charge-sheet. In that charge-sheet, there were six charges, one

Khagendra Nath Vs. Junior Assessor, Procurement P.S. Sonarpur

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1953Cal719,57CWN684

ORDER1. These three Rules arise out of proceedings under the West Bengal Foodgrains (Intensive Procurement) Order, 1952. The Rules are directed against the order of the appellate officer rejecting the petitioners' appeals under