Proctor - Judgment Search Results

Proctor Vs. Warden

Court: US Supreme Court

Proctor v. Warden - 435 U.S. 559 (1978) U.S. Supreme Court

Tilghman Vs. Proctor

Court: US Supreme Court

Tilghman v. Proctor - 125 U.S. 136 (1888) U.S. Supreme Court Tilghman v.

Tilghman Vs. Proctor

Court: US Supreme Court

Tilghman v. Proctor - 102 U.S. 707 (1880) U.S. Supreme Court Tilghman v.

The Proctor and Gamble Co. and anr Vs. Shipra Laboratories.

Court: Delhi

1. Plaintiff No.1 is a Company registered in USA, whereas plaintiff No.2 is a Company registered in India. Plaintiff No.2...

M/S.Proctor and Gamble Home Products Ltd. Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH WEDNESDAY, THE22D DAY OF JANUARY20142ND MAGHA, 1935...

Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing (Tianjin) Co Ltd & Ors. Vs.anchor Healt ...

Court: Delhi

Reserved on:03. 10.2016 Judgment delivered on:25. 10.2016 FAO (OS) 257/2016 PROCTOR & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING (TIANJIN) CO LTD & ORS. ..... Appellants

The Proctor and Gamble Company Represented by Power of Attorney Holder ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1989)1MLJ36

Srinivasan, J.1. These two appeals are directed against the order of Bhaskaran, J., sitting on the original side of this...

Proctor and Gamble and Shri Ashish Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2005)(190)ELT490Tri(Mum.)bai

pattern of PGIL, PGHP, Richardson Vicks Inc USA and the Proctor & Gamble Company, USA who is holding company of Richardson

Proctor and Gamble India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Cen. Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2006)(111)ECC657

1. In this case, modvat credit of Rs. 29,923/- has been disallowed to the appellants herein on the ground that...

Staub Vs. Proctor Hospital

Court: US Supreme Court

Staub v. Proctor Hospital - 09-400 (2011) SYLLABUS OCTOBER TERM, 2010 STAUB V.