Skip to content


Processioning - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: processioning Page 1 of about 334 results (0.034 seconds)
Feb 05 1987 (HC)

Bharat Process and Mechanical Engineers Ltd. Assistants, Apprentices a ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1987)IILLJ404Cal

the inherent necessities of the proper operation of the judicial process, the duty of person exercising public power to justify that

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 07 2006 (TRI)

Mallika Saree Processing Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2006)(110)ECC30

hence it has got retrospective effect from 1.3.02. (c) The process of calendering is not a process of manufacture and no

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 27 1887 (FN)

New Process Fermentation Co. Vs. Maus

Court: US Supreme Court

430 13, 1871, do not any of them disclose the process of the appellant of controlling the action of beer in

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 23 1987 (HC)

Extrusion Processes Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Collector of C.E.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1987(3)BomCR673; 1988(36)ELT531(Bom)

the conclusion that 'printing and lacquering do not involve the process of forming a tube from a metal slug or dump

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 23 1987 (HC)

Extrusion Processes Pvt. Ltd. and Mobanbhai I. Patel of Bombay Vs. Shr ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1988(14)LC529(Bombay)

manufacture as authoritatively held by two High Courts, becomes a process of manufacture.6. The word 'manufacture' has not been denned in

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 11 1984 (TRI)

Jai Hind Process and Printing Vs. Collector of Customs and Central

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1985)LC457Tri(Delhi)

and in that context it was held that no manufacturing process could be said to have been involved by printing of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 30 1989 (TRI)

Usha Micro Process Controls Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1991)LC138Tri(Delhi)

normally dumb terminals and a graphic terminal had a micro processor which was capable of processing data and could direct the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 09 1999 (TRI)

Process Plant (India) Ltd. and Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1999)(66)ECC150

three different units in the name and style of M/s. Process Plant (India), M/s. Industrial Products, and M/s. Neelam Industries with

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 03 1993 (HC)

Poonam Stone Processing Industries Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Commerci ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: [1994]94STC183(Kar)

Supreme Court. The Supreme Court was concerned mainly with the processes of bleaching, dyeing, printing, sizing, mercerising, etc. These processes were

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 08 1973 (HC)

Extrusion Process Pvt. Ltd. Vs. N.R. Jadhav, Superintendent of Central ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: 1979(4)ELT380(Guj); (1974)GLR161

published by the Indian Standards Institution. If extrusion means the process of forming a tube from a metal slug or dump,

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //