Skip to content


Procession - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: procession Year: 1982 Page 1 of about 303 results (0.04 seconds)
Dec 15 1982 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras Vs. Prasad Process (Pvt.) Ltd.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-15-1982

Reported in: [1983]141ITR9(Mad)

..... what it is that the legislature is driving at we should not mind if this process is called purposive or activist we do not consider them as words of abuse any .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 08 1982 (HC)

Extrussion Processes Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. Chief Controller of Imp ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-08-1982

Reported in: 1984(15)ELT25(Bom)

1 though this petition was argued at considerable length the controversy lies in a very narrow compass and the short...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 30 1982 (FN)

Washington Vs. Seattle Sch. Dist. No. 1

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-30-1982

..... 350 both creates a constitutionally suspect racial classification and radically restructures the political process of washington by allowing a statewide majority to usurp traditional local authority over ..... the seattle plan footnote 30 we also note that singling out the political processes affecting racial issues for uniquely disadvantageous treatment inevitably raises dangers of impermissible .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 02 1982 (FN)

United States Vs. Valenzuela-bernal

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jul-02-1982

..... same materiality requirement obtains with respect to a due process claim due process guarantees that a criminal defendant will be treated ..... not to impair the defendant s rights to due process and compulsory process is to permit the government to deport potential ..... between a criminal defendant s constitutional rights under the compulsory process clause and the government s policy of prompt deportation .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 29 1982 (FN)

Asarco Inc. Vs. Idaho State Tax Comm'n

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-29-1982

..... unitary nonferrous metals business this alone warrants affirming the idaho supreme court s due process ruling b second again assuming arguendo that the contested investments were in fact passive ..... contrast congress generally cannot waive a ruling of this court decided under the due process clause accordingly this court s threshold for invalidating state legislation should be considerably higher .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 05 1982 (FN)

Engle Vs. Isaac

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-05-1982

..... years following that decision numerous defendants relied upon winship to argue that the due process clause requires the prosecution to bear the burden of disproving certain affirmative defenses and ..... part of its task of establishing guilty mens rea voluntariness and unlawfulness the due process clause according to respondents interpretation of winship mullaney and patterson forbids the states to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 24 1982 (FN)

Santosky Vs. Kramer

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-24-1982

..... time immemorial and not without good reason equally as troubling is the majority s due process analysis the fourteenth amendment guarantees that a state will treat individuals with fundamental fairness ..... inadequate under the fourteenth amendment it means simply that the adequacy of the state provided process is to be judged by constitutional standards standards which the majority itself equates to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 25 1982 (FN)

Smith Vs. Phillips

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-25-1982

..... release simply because the failure of the prosecutors to disclose their knowledge denied respondent due process ibid the court explained to condone the withholding by the prosecutor of information casting ..... conduct acted to deprive respondent of this alternative the state cannot consistent with due process relegate respondent s right to an impartial jury to a belated inadequate post trial .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 24 1982 (FN)

Logan Vs. Zimmerman Brush Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-24-1982

..... was impermissible unless constitutionally adequate notice and hearing procedures were established before the settlement process vent into effect id at 339 u s 315 despite appellee zimmerman brush company ..... 441 most important the procedure at issue does not serve generally to hasten the processing or ultimate termination of employment controversies once the commission has scheduled a factfinding .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 30 1982 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat-i Vs. Lakhtar Cotton Press Co. (Pv ...

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Jun-30-1982

Reported in: [1983]142ITR503(Guj)

..... alter their form may be taken in by the term processing processing in the context would therefore mean something less than ..... are right in their contention that the ginning process is a manufacturing process their lordships therefore expressly overruled the decision of ..... learned judge observed that the activity contemplated by the word process in general requiring any continuous and regular action or .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //