Procession - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: procession Year: 1979 Page 1 of about 302 results (0.078 seconds)Extrusion Process Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-02-1979
Reported in: [1979]119ITR287(Bom); [1979]2TAXMAN64(Bom)
chandurkar j 1 in this reference we are concerned with the assessment of the assessee for the assessment year 1961...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHerber Vs. Lando
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-18-1979
..... reversed two judges concluding that the first amendment lent sufficient protection to the editorial processes to protect the network employee from inquiry about his thoughts opinions and conclusions ..... responsible journalism id at 980 an editorial privilege protecting this aspect of the editorial process would essentially be analogous to the executive privilege which shields the advisory opinions .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTParham Vs. J.R.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-20-1979
..... that states may legitimately take into account while as a general rule due process requires that commitment hearings precede involuntary hospitalization when parents seek to hospitalize their ..... hearings let alone reasonably prompt hearings the procedures lack all the traditional due process safeguards commitment decisions are made ex parte georgia s institutionalized juveniles are not informed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGreenholtz Vs. Inmates of Nebraska Penal Complex
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-29-1979
..... proceedings clearly implicate this retained liberty interest the fourteenth amendment requires that due process be observed irrespective of the specific provisions in the applicable parole statute this ..... does affect whether additional procedures are constitutionally compelled the specific dictates of due process of course depend on what a particular situation demands see cafeteria restaurant workers .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBell Vs. Wolfish
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-14-1979
..... of pretrial detention that implicate only the protection against deprivation of liberty without due process of law the proper inquiry is whether those conditions or restrictions amount to punishment ..... above constitute punishment in violation of the rights of pretrial detainees under the due process clause of the fifth amendment these restrictions and practices were reasonable responses by mcc .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVijay Textile, a Partnership Firm at Plot No 4, Nerol Abendaly Vs. Uni ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jan-24-1979
Reported in: 1979CENCUS145D; 1979(4)ELT181(Guj); (1979)0GLR944
..... which duty has been paid at the appropriate rate when subjected to finishing process or further finishing process or processes shall be exempt from so much of the duty of excise leviable thereon ..... first schedule of the act manufactured fabrics commonly known as powerloom cloth without finishing or processing if the installation of such powerloom was with the writtem permission of the textile .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMadras Aluminium Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-27-1979
Reported in: 1990LC607(Madras); 1980CENCUS50D; 1981(8)ELT478(Mad)
..... in the production of aluminium properzi rods and the nature of the manufacturing process 23 the process of manufacturing properzi rods was invented by an italian engineer sig ilari properzi ..... manufacturers of vanaspathi purchase groundnut oil from the market and subject them to different processes before applying hydrogenation to produce vanaspathi according to the excise authorities before finally .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBachan Singh S/O Saudagar Singh Vs. State of Punjab
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-04-1979
Reported in: (1982)3SCC24; 19831SCR145;
..... exercise of discretion by means of explicit standards to be followed in the sentencing process these guided discretion statutes provided standards typically in the form of specific aggravating ..... a reason which incidentally explains why corporate criminals including top executives whom by subtle processes account for slow or sudden killing of large members by adulteration smuggling cornering .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMackey Vs. Montrym
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-25-1979
..... suspension hearing declared the statute unconstitutional on its face as violative of the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment and granted injunctive relief held the massachusetts statute is ..... hearing contemplated by the district court substantially enhance the reliability of the pre suspension process clerical errors and deficiencies in the officer s report of refusal of course could .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Vs. Caceres
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-02-1979
..... governmental regularity on which they rest to make subjective reliance controlling in due process analysis deflects inquiry from the relevant constitutional issue the legitimacy of government ..... the government necessarily qualifies this commitment if prejudice becomes critical in measuring due process obligations individual officials may simply dispense with whatever procedures are unlikely to prove .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial