Procession - Judgment Search Results

Extrusion Process Pvt. Ltd. Vs. N.R. Jadhav, Superintendent of Central ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: 1979(4)ELT380(Guj); (1974)GLR161

..... laid down in that decision that though manufacturing requires application of some sort of processes every processing cannot be equated to manufacture manufacture brings into existence the supreme court has ..... relating to the manufacture of extruded aluminium pipes and tubes including incidental and ancillary process of printing and lacquering them on 2nd march 1971 the petitioner replied to the .....

Procaccini Vs. Jones

Court: US Supreme Court

procaccini v jones 414 u s 951 1973 u s supreme court procaccini v jones 414 u s 951 1973...

Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru and ors.Vs. State of Kerala and anr ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1973SC1461; (1973)4SCC225; [1973]SuppSCR1

..... for classification may gradually and imperceptibly deprive the article of its glorious content that process would inevitably and in substituting the doctrine of classification for the doctrine of equality ..... difficult balances 2012 structural socio political value choices involve a complex and complicated political process this court is hardly fitted for performing that function in the absence of any .....

San Antonio Indep. Sch. Dist. Vs. Rodriguez

Court: US Supreme Court

..... constitutional values with respect to freedom of speech and participation in the political process makes this a different case from our prior decisions concerning discrimination affecting public ..... the entire gamut of local educational policymaking teachers curriculum school sites the whole process of allocating resources among alternative educational objectives a second possibility is the much discussed .....

Vlandis Vs. Kline

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the elusive and arbitrary compelling state interest concept into the orbit of the due process clause the court categorizes the connecticut statutory classification as a permanent and irrebuttable presumption ..... the doctrine that prevailed in lochner coppage adkins burns and like cases that due process authorizes courts to hold laws unconstitutional when they believe the legislature has acted unwisely .....

Gosa Vs. Mayden

Court: US Supreme Court

..... o callahan was to overcome an aspect of military trials which substantially impaired the truthfinding process and brought into question the accuracy of all the guilty verdicts rendered by military tribunals ..... the court martial lacks fundamental page 413 u s 681 integrity in its truth determining process footnote 6 indeed our subsequent ruling in relford itself indicates our conclusion that military .....

ChaffIn Vs. Stynchcombe

Court: US Supreme Court

..... consider whether in those states that entrust the sentencing responsibility to the jury the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment bars the jury from rendering higher sentences on retrials ..... some length with the constitutional problems surrounding the imposition of difficult choices in the criminal process and is of particular relevance since it arises in the context of jury sentencing .....

United States Vs. Scrap

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and to the public and shall accompany the proposal through the existing agency review processes footnote 9 the environmental defense fund national parks and conservation association and izaak ..... paper and plastics from municipal refuse before incineration has been assembled at edmonston the process involves coarse shredding of the refuse followed with air classification magnetic separation screening .....

United States Vs. Kras

Court: US Supreme Court

..... appellee an unconstitutional denial of fifth amendment rights of due process including equal protection held this case is not controlled by ..... case in light of the principles enunciated in our due process decisions that delimit rights of defendants compelled to litigate their ..... the states but the concepts of equal protection and due process both stemming from our american ideal of fairness are not .....

Chambers Vs. Mississippi

Court: US Supreme Court

..... but its denial or significant diminution calls into question the ultimate integrity of the factfinding process and requires that the competing interest be closely examined berger v california 393 u ..... against interest hearsay exception appears to be accepted by most states in their criminal trial processes footnote 16 although a number of states have discarded it footnote 17 declarations against .....