Proceeding - Judgment Search Results

Sou Motu Proceedings vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

DATED 13/6/16 IN ST NO.268 OF 2013 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -II, KOLLAM PETITIONER SUO MOTU PROCEEDINGS AS PER THE RESOLUTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE IN ITS MEETING HELD ON 18/09/2017RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA

Sou Motu Proceedings vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

DATED 14/06/2016 IN ST NO.145 OF 2013 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -II, KOLLAM PETITIONER SUO MOTU PROCEEDINGS AS PER THE RESOLUTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE IN ITS MEETING HELD ON 18/09/2017 RESPONDENTS:1 STATE OF KERALA

Contempt Proceedings Vs. Kanwar Singh Saini Overruled

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 161(2009)DLT466

ORDERP.K. Bhasin, J.1. A Reference was made to this Court by a Civil Judge for initiation of contempt proceedings against one Kanwar Singh Saini, who was the sole defendant in a Civil Suit for injunction (hereinafter referred

Suomoto Proceedings in Flesh Trade Vs. State and ors.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: 2008(1)JKJ161

Bashir A. Kirmani, J.1. On 02.05.2006, this Court initiated suomoto proceedings in the matter in following terms:1. For a couple of preceding days, painful reports regarding inducement, and blackmail

Proceedings Are Deemed to Be Instituted Only on the Vs. State of Punja ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Division Bench held as follows:- “A perusal of the afore-mentioned rules show that where a departmental or judicial proceeding is instituted under clause (b) of Rule 2.2 of the Rules no gratuity or death cum retirement gratuity

Banabihari Mohanty (Dr.) Vs. Member, Disciplinary Proceedings Tribunal ...

Court: Orissa

Reported in: (1997)ILLJ987Ori; 1996(I)OLR304

Pasayat, J.1. Petitioner calls in question vires of Rule 6(2) of the Orissa Disciplinary Proceedings (Administrative Tribunals) Rules, 1951 (in short, the 'Rules'), on the ground that it offends fair play and equity.2.

R.S. Ramachandran Vs. Contempt Proceedings Initiated by the Court on I ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: ILR1975Delhi868

the criminal may escape without any kind of punishment.' (11) I he defenses of the respondent in this proceeding may be briefly noticed: (1)There was no publicity of the letter. (2)S. N. Ainiley C. J. having retired

Re: Suo Moto Proceedings Against Mr. R. Karuppan, Advocate

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2001SC2204; 2001CriLJ2611; 2001(4)SCALE199; (2001)5SCC289; [2001]3SCR750

concealed the fact that copy of the said press note was included in the files of the contempt proceedings initiated against S.K. Sundaram as early as 7.11.2000. Mr. Karuppan admitted before us that he himself appeared in

In Re: Suo Motu Proceedings, Delhi Transport Department

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1998(9)SC140; (1998)9SCC250

ORDER1. Pursuant to this Court's order dated 8-11-1996 Ms Kiran Dhingra, Commissioner-cum-Secretary (Transport), Transport Department, Government of NCT of Delhi has filed an affidavit. She has given various suggestions which we appreciate. We are of the...

Suo Motu Proceedings vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

OF 2015 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -II, ALUVA THE COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION: SUO MOTU PROCEEDINGS ON A COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM THE DISTRICT JUDGE, ERNAKULAM REGARDING WRONG COMMITTAL IN SC 771/2015 OF THE ADDITIONAL