Probative - Judgment Search Results

State of J and K and ors. Vs. Prob. Constable Bashir Ahmad

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: 2008(3)JKJ244

..... not inclined to serve the department thus keeping in view the above mentioned fact the prob const bashir ahmad no 411 iii is struck of from the roll of this bn .....

The State of Karnataka by Its Secretary, Home Department, Vs. Sri D.R. ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2007KAR221

cyriac joseph c j 1 this writ petition is filed against the order dated 03 02 2006 passed by the...

O'Brien (Respondent) Vs. Chief Constable of South Wales Police (Appell ...

Court: House of Lords

..... enquiry to regard evidence of such earlier events as potentially probative is a process of thought which an entirely rational ..... likely to give rise to irrational prejudice which outweighs the probative effect that the evidence has in logic this consideration of ..... stage is that of relevance whether the evidence is logically probative or disprobative of some matter which requires proof director of .....

Green Vs. Bock Laundry Machine Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... for the purpose of attacking the witness credibility only if the court determines that the probativeness of the evidence outweighs its prejudice to the defendant mandates admission for impeachment purposes ..... a 1 authorizes impeachment by felony convictions but only if the court determines that probative value outweighs prejudicial effect to the defendant the conference committee s report makes it .....

Tome Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... may arise instances when out of court statements that postdate the alleged fabrication have some probative force in rebutting a charge of fabrication or improper influence or motive but those ..... introduce out of court statements that contain strong circumstantial indicia of reliability that are highly probative on the material questions at trial and that are better than other evidence otherwise .....

Baxter Vs. Palmigiano

Court: US Supreme Court

..... adverse inferences against parties to civil actions when they refuse to testify in response to probative evidence offered against them the amendment does not preclude the inference where the privilege is ..... does not automatically follow from an inmate s silence in sanctioning reliance on silence as probative of guilt of the disciplinary offense charged the court allows prison officials to make costly .....

Jenkins Vs. Anderson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... silence is so inconsistent with present statements that impeachment by reference to such silence is probative in this case in which no governmental action induced petitioner to remain silent before ..... silence is so inconsistent with present statements that impeachment by reference to such silence is probative for example this court has exercised its supervisory powers over federal courts to hold .....

Old Chief Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... difference between the evidentiary significance of the admission and the official record s legitimately probative component and since the functions of the competing evidence were distinguishable only by the ..... against a particular charge the overriding policy of excluding such evidence despite its admitted probative value is the practical experience that its disallowance tends to prevent confusion of .....

Walker Vs. Whitwell

Court: House of Lords

..... introduced when writing was not so ordinary witnesses insert in writs although not subscribing are probative witnesses and by their forgetfulness may easily disown their being witnesses 8221 the statute accordingly ..... that only subscribing witnesses in writs to be subscribed by any partie hereafter shall be probative and not the witnesses insert not subscribing 8221 it was further declared 8220 that .....

United States Vs. Abel

Court: US Supreme Court

..... wide discretion in determining the admissibility of evidence under the federal rules assessing the probative value of common membership in any particular group and weighing any factors counseling against ..... respondent contends because the mere fact of mills membership without more was not sufficiently probative of mills character for truthfulness respondent cites a second error under the same rule .....