Skip to content


Pro - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: pro Page 1 of about 92 results (0.018 seconds)
Feb 19 1997 (FN)

Schenck Vs. Pro-choice Network of Western N. Y.

Court: US Supreme Court

parties before us has suggested that the injunction does not provide for such zones. 380 380 SCHENCK v. PRO-CHOICE NETWORK OF

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 06 2006 (TRI)

Kwal Pro Exports Vs. the A.C.i.T.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur

its own, then how the goods could be manufactured or produced. Here we find that the ld.CIT fell in error because

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 29 2001 (TRI)

Pro-quip Corporation Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Authority for Advance Rulings

technology has been made available. Similarly, the use of a product, which embodies technology, shall not per se constitute technology being

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 29 2001 (HC)

In Re, Pro-quip Corporation

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (2002)174CTR(Del)531

technical assistance is provided by the licensor apart from the property licensed. To get over this difficulty article 12 of the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 22 2017 (HC)

Pro Sportify Pvt. Ltd. Vs.the Commissioner of Entertainment Tax, Gnctd

Court: Delhi

of the month for which tax is due and the provisions of sub-rules (2) and (3) of rule 25 shall mutatis

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 27 1996 (FN)

Brown Vs. Pro Football, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

the developmental squad plan to the Players Association. The NFL proposed a squad player salary of $1,000 per week. The Players

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 16 2018 (HC)

Pro Commissioner of Income-Tax-2 vs.m/s Chrys Capital Investment Advis ...

Court: Delhi

versus ........ Appellant CHRYSCAPITAL LTD. .. ... Respondent + ITA3492018 PRO COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- 2 ....... Appellant versus MIS CHRYS

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 04 2017 (HC)

Pro Minerals Private Limited and Anr. Vs. Reserve Bank of India and Or ...

Court: Kolkata

order, he submits that the petitioner had admitted that two promoters/directors had resigned from their office although they retained the control

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 01 2024 (SC)

M/s. Pro Knits Vs. The Board Of Directors Of Canara Bank

Court: Supreme Court of India

Counsels for the Respondents-banks that in all the cases, the proceedings under the SARFAESI Act have already been concluded and the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 27 1998 (TRI)

Pro Agro Seed Co. Ltd. Vs. Cc

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1998)(77)LC340Tri(Mum.)bai

find whether any notice was issued to the appellants to produce these documents on the basis of which refund claim was

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //