Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Pro - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 01 2024

M/s. Pro Knits Vs. The Board Of Directors Of Canara Bank

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-01-2024

COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO …. OF2024(@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.7898 OF2024 M/S. PRO KNITS .....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CANARA BANK & ORS. ....RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO ….


Apr 04 2017

Pro Minerals Private Limited and Anr. Vs. Reserve Bank of India and Or ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Apr-04-2017

ORDER SHEET WP No.170 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE PRO MINERALS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. Versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK Date


Dec 22 2017

Pro Sportify Pvt. Ltd. Vs.the Commissioner of Entertainment Tax, Gnctd

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-22-2017

+ W.P.(C) 2563/2013 versus $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:24. 11.2017 PRONOUNCED ON:22. 12.2017 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 4966/2013, C.M. APPL.11216/2013, 6704/2016, 6706/2014 &


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 16 2018

Pro Commissioner of Income-Tax-2 vs.m/s Chrys Capital Investment Advis ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-16-2018

16.4.2018 + ITA3462018 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX versus ........ Appellant CHRYSCAPITAL LTD. ….. ... Respondent + ITA3492018 PRO COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- 2 ....... Appellant versus MIS CHRYS CAPITAL INVESTMENT ADVISORS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ..... RESPONDENTPresent


Dec 14 2022

Pauly vs Pro.Syed Muhammed Sha

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Dec-14-2022

THRISSUR REVISION PETITIONER/APPELLANT/RESPONDENT: PAULY AGED 57 YEARS CHETTUPUZHAKKARAN ANTONEY, CHIYYARAM VILLAGE, THRISSUR THALUK. BY ADV V.C.MADHAVANKUTTY RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: 1 PRO.SYED MUHAMMED SHA,S/O.PROF.SYED MOIDEENSHA, RESIDING AT ABAD, KOORKANCHERY VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK-680 007. 2 MEHARUNNEESA BEEGAM, AGED 72 YEARS D/O.PROF.SYED


Oct 19 2022

Sure Organic Pro vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Oct-19-2022

GRAMA PANCHAYAT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, TRIPRANGODE, MALAPPURAM - 676 108. 9 CLEAN HABITS KARYAVATTOM REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR MUSTHAFA ANDUKADAN, CLEAN HABITS LLP, DOOR NO.2/262, HOTEL KARYAVATTOM, MALAPPURAM - 679 325. ADDL.R10 TIRUR BLOCK PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED


Dec 05 2025

M R Pro Tech Private Limited vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Dec-05-2025

2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 13086 OF 2025 (T-IT) BETWEEN:1. M R PRO TECH PRIVATE LIMITED NO.10, CMC COMPLEX BCH ROAD, RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 098. PAN: AAGCM3696KREPRESENTED BY MANAGING


Mar 19 2025

Pro Knits vs the Authorised Officer

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-19-2025

a detailed statement of accounts specifying the manner in which the ECGC claim of Rs.18,64,04,059/- and the sale proceeds of already sold properties have been appropriated, including an itemized breakdown of the application of each payment towards


Sep 11 2025

M/S Pro Eye Security Solutions (1) Private Limited vs the Principal Co ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Sep-11-2025

ON 05/04/2024 BEARING DIN NO. 20240357000000111F67 PASSED AGAINST THE PETITIONER, VIDE ANNX-E; iii) DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NOT TO PROCEED WITH COERCIVE STEPS BY WAY OF ANY PROCEEDINGS OF WHATSOEVER IN NATURE, ARISING PURSUANT TO IMPUGNEDORDER DATED PASSED


Feb 24 2020

M/S.Pro Laboratories Pvt , vs Regional Drugs Inspector Kollam

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Feb-24-2020

OF 2015 AGAINST S.C No.931/2014 ON THE FILE OF HON'BLE DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT, KOLLAM PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1: M/S PRO LABORATORIES PVT. LTD, 140-141, MAKKANPUR, BHAGAWANPUR, ROORKEE, DISTRICT, HARIDWAR (U.K), PIN 247 661, REPRESENTED BY THE DIRECTOR BY


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial