Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Prison - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 30 1971

Danial H. Walcott J. Prisoner Vs. Superintendent, Nagpur Central Priso ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-30-1971

Reported in: 1972CriLJ673

Chandurkar, J. 1. The petitioner in this petition is a prisoner who is serving jail sentences awarded to him by the Presidency Magistrate's Court in Bombay as also by


Apr 26 2010

Director General (Prison) Vs. Sh. Hari Shankar

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-26-2010

17th February, 2004 was supposed to reach at 7.00 hours. His responsibility was to hand over the UT Prisoners for local production and outstation production but due to his late coming, his work was handled by other


Sep 15 2012

Thagendra Budhmagar Prisoner Vs. State (Through Public Prosecutor)

Court: Mumbai Goa

Decided on: Sep-15-2012

Oral Judgment: By this appeal, the appellant/accused takes exception to the judgment and order dated 29.4.2009 passed by Special Judge, NDPS, Court, Mapusa in Special Criminal Case No.14/2008 convicting the accused for the offence punishable under...


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 17 2013

inspector General (Prisons) U.T. Chandigarh and Others Vs. Central Inf ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-17-2013

C.W.P.No.23510 of 2012 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.23510 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision :17. 07.2013 Inspector General (Prisons).U.T., Chandigarh and others .....Petitioners versus Central Information Commissioner, New...


Sep 15 2012

Thagendra Budhmagar Prisoner Vs. State (Through Public Prosecutor)

Court: Mumbai Goa

Decided on: Sep-15-2012

Oral Judgment: By this appeal, the appellant/accused takes exception to the judgment and order dated 29.4.2009 passed by Special Judge, NDPS, Court, Mapusa in Special Criminal Case No.14/2008 convicting the accused for the offence punishable under...


Jul 01 2013

Prisoners Rights Forum Vs. Union of India

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jul-01-2013

AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL Writ Petitions No.26506 of 2010 and 28388 of 2010 W.P.No.26506 of 2010: -------------------- Prisoners Rights Forum (A registered Public Trust bearing Regn.No.4319/2008) No.5, 4th Floor, Sungurama Chetty Street, Chennai-600001, Rep.by itsTrustee and


Dec 02 1998

Superintendent, Central Prison, Chenchalguda, Hyderabad and Others Vs. ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-02-1998

Reported in: 1999(1)ALD110; 1999(1)ALT107; 1999CriLJ1425

Petition No.35131 of 1997. The learned single Judge has allowed the writ petition and directed the Superintendent, Central Prison, Chcnclialguda, Hyderabad to transfer the writ petitioner to Borstal School at Nizamabad. The judgment of the learned single


May 31 1993

A Convict Prisoner in the Central Prison Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Decided on: May-31-1993

Reported in: 1993CriLJ3242

J.1. This case was registered on the basis of a petition sent to this Court, by a convict prisoner lodged in the Thiruvanan-thapuram Central Jail. He remains like many others - a nameless face in the pageant.


Apr 13 1983

In Re: Prison Reforms Enhancement of Wages of Prisoners Etc.

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Apr-13-1983

Reported in: AIR1983Ker261

Subramonian Poti, Ag. C.J.1. This Court has been receiving petitions from prisoners in the various jails of the State either directly or through the grievance deposit boxes maintained in the


Sep 03 1931

(Kota) Potharaju--prisoner Vs. Emperor

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-03-1931

Reported in: AIR1932Mad25; 136Ind.Cas.314

1. Two questions arise in this appeal. The first is what offence has been committed; the second, what the sentence should be. The appellant does not deny that he killed his mistress a woman called Mahalakshmi,...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial