Principal Officer - Judgment Search Results

Principal Officer, L.G. Electronics (P.) Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commission ...

Court: Allahabad

Matched in: Parties Principal Officer, L.G. Electronics (P.) Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax

Principal Officer, Somani Iron Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Lucknow

Reported in: (2003)86ITD750Luck

1. These three appeals have been filed by the same assessee, namely, the Principal Officer, M/s Somani Iron & Steels Ltd., Kanpur, against a combined order of CIT(A), dt. 7th June, 2000, for

CaptaIn Subash Kumar Vs. Principal Officer, Mercantile Marine Departme ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1991SC1632; 1991CriLJ2000; 1991(1)Crimes830(SC); JT1991(1)SC658; 1991(1)SCALE262; (1991)2SCC449; [1991]1SCR743

Madras Radio, which was the communication center between the land and seafaring ships, informed the office of the Principal Officer, Mercantile Marine Department, Madras, District Madras, hereinafter called as 'Principal Officer', that an urgent message had been received … seafaring ships, informed the office of the Principal Officer, Mercantile Marine Department, Madras, District Madras, hereinafter called as 'Principal Officer', that an urgent message had been received by the said Radio from the appellant and from that communication

Capt.T.S.Asokan vs the Principal Officer,

Court: Kerala

VILLAGE, KOOTTANAD, PALAKKAD. BY ADVS. SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN (SR.) SRI.S.SUJIN RESPONDENTS: 1 GAS AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. (GAIL) REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL OFFICER, KKBMPL, PROJECT OFFICE, 10TH FLOOR, REVENUE TOWER, PARK AVENUE ROAD, KOCHI-682 011. 2 PRINCIPAL OFFICER, GAS AUTHORITY OF … (GAIL) REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL OFFICER, KKBMPL, PROJECT OFFICE, 10TH FLOOR, REVENUE TOWER, PARK AVENUE ROAD, KOCHI-682 011. 2 PRINCIPAL OFFICER, GAS AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD (GAIL), KKBMPL, PROJECT OFFICE, 10TH FLOOR, REVENUE TOWER, PARK AVENUE ROAD, KOCHI-682 011.

Bhartiya Contenor Nigam Ltd. Vs. Principal Officer/Assessment Officer, ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR2009All182; 2009(3)AWC3098

Matched in: Parties Bhartiya Contenor Nigam Ltd. Vs. Principal Officer/Assessment Officer, Zone-5, Kanpur Nagar Nigam and anr.

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Principal Officer C/O Arkay Wires (P) L ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [2005]127CompCas250(All); (2005)193CTR(All)697; [2005]277ITR225(All)

the Government department. The relevant Clauses (1) and (5) of the said agreement are reproduced below :'(1) The principal hereby appoints the agent to be its selling agent for the sale of mild steel wires, galvanised wires … and other perks to attract the people who are efficient and hard working. Different offers made to an officer by the employer, same may be either for the benefit of the employee himself or for the benefit

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Principal Officer, Laxmi Surgical Pvt. ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1993]202ITR601(Bom)

Matched in: Parties Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Principal Officer, Laxmi Surgical Pvt. Ltd

The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax vs Murlikrishna Reddy, Managing ...

Court: Karnataka

AS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE) …APPELLANTDigitally signed by SAMREEN MURLIKRISHNA REDDY, AYUB DESHNUR MANAGING DIRECTOR AND PRINCIPAL OFFICER, Location: HIGH COURT OF M/S. GENEVA SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, KARNATAKA NO. 82, 1ST FLOOR, RESEARCH CENTRS-II, VYDEHI CAMPUS,

Mspl Ltd., a Company Registered Under Companies Act, Rep. by Its Execu ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: IV(2007)BC124

Matched in: Parties Mspl Ltd., a Company Registered Under Companies Act, Rep. by Its Executive Director Shrenik B. Baldota and Ramgad Minerals and Mining Pvt Ltd., a Company Registered Under Companies Act, Rep. by Its Director Shrenik N. Baldota Vs. Neg Micon (India) Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by Its Principal Officer

State of Kerala Vs. Manager, Nimala Public School and the Principal Of ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR2008Ker197; 2008(2)KLJ704; 2008(3)KLT47

are as follows:(i) The schools should be run by a registered society or trust and one of the principal purpose of such society/trust must be educational. (ii) Each school must have a properly constituted governing Body. (iii) … year 2005. It is their case that their applications were processed and reports of the concerned District Educational Officer etc. were received. But, they were informed that Government will pass final orders in the applications only after