Primely - Judgment Search Results

Prime Shipping Inc. Six Vs. All Persons and Entities Who Have Claim Ag ...

Court: Kolkata

a fresh suit and proving its claim. Admittedly by limiting the liability of the owners of Vessel M.V. Prime Value the decree dated 10th May, 2006 rejected the objection of the applicant to creation of the fund.

Siel Ltd. and anr. Vs. Prime Industries Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2008(4)ARBLR124(Delhi); 155(2008)DLT250; 2008(106)DRJ741

Ltd. and Anr. (hereafter referred to as SIEL or as the petitioner) being OMP No. 419/2005 and M/s. Prime Industries Ltd. (hereafter referred to as the claimant or Prime Industries as the case may be) being OMP

M/s Prime Properties Vs. Sana Lakshmi Devi (died) Through Her Lrs

Court: Supreme Court of India

THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2022(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.6464 of 2022) M/S PRIME PROPERTIES .....Appellant(s) VERSUS SANA LAKSHMI DEVI (DIED) THROUGH HER LRS & ORS. .....Respondent(s) JUDGMENT DINESH MAHESHWARI,J.Leave granted.2. This

M/S Prime Impex Ltd.and ors. Vs. M/S P.E.C.Ltd.and anr

Court: Supreme Court of India

THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.480 OF 201.(@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION(CRIMINAL)NO.6102 OF 2012.M/S. PRIME IMPEX LTD. & ORS. APPELLANTS VERSUS M/S. P.E.C. LTD. & ANR. RESPONDENTS ORDER 1. Leave granted.2. This appeal

Prime Channel and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1999SC1497; JT1998(4)SC493; 1998(3)SCALE666b; (1998)5SCC580

ORDER1. After hearing learned counsel for the parties we modify clause 3 of the terms indicated in the order of this Court dated 11th of December, 1996 because this Court was given to understand that the...

Prime Channel and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (2000)10SCC606

the extension of the serial for another 56 episodes more. This is seriously opposed by the original appellant Prime Channel, on the ground that they were asked to wait till the completion of the initially agreed 91

Prime Meiden Ltd. Vs. Ramky Infrastructure Ltd.

Court: Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgement delivered on:10. 12.2014 + ARB.P. 622/2014 PRIME MEIDEN LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Mayank Bhugani, Adv. versus RAMKY INFRASTRUCTURE LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr Atul

Prime Meiden Ltd. Vs. Ramky Infrastructure Ltd.

Court: Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgement delivered on:10. 12.2014 + ARB.P. 622/2014 PRIME MEIDEN LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Mayank Bhugani, Adv. versus RAMKY INFRASTRUCTURE LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr Atul

Prime Steels Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court: Kolkata

ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE WP1210OF2013PRIME STEELS Versus STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE HARISH TANDON Date : 18th December, 2013. Mr.Piyal Gupta, Advocate …for...

Blue Prime Aluminum Ltd. and Others Vs. LandT Finance Ltd.

Court: Mumbai

1. By this notice of motion, the applicants seek condonation of delay of 24 days in filing the present arbitration petition. 2. Mr.Poojary, learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the petition is not filed...