Premises - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: premises Year: 2016 Page 1 of about 302 results (0.073 seconds)Central Board of Trustees, EPF Vs. Nutan Pushpak Premises Co-op. Socie ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-29-2016
..... maharashtra co operative societies act 1960 being a co operative society of owners of commercial premises employing at all material times less than thirteen employees these employees were all watchmen and ..... sweepers employed for protection and maintenance of the premises the employees carried on work without the aid of power on these facts the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrabhakar Vs. Additional District Magistrate Collectorate Premises, Na ...
Court: Mumbai Nagpur
Decided on: Feb-12-2016
p c 1 by this writ petition the petitioner challenges the order of the additional district magistrate nagpur dated 9...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMessrs Miscellenary Marketers Vs. Messrs Sun-N-Sand Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-08-2016
..... the defendants did not have exclusive possession of one premises as the premises have changed from time to time with the agreements ..... the defendants were their licensees in respect of the suit premises which issues were answered against the defendants i e messrs ..... for which space was provided by the plaintiffs the suit premises therefore assume secondary importance and the licence granted can therefore .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNorth Delhi Municipal Corportation Vs. Amrit Mehta and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2016
..... injunction as they were in legal possession pursuant to abandonment of the suit tenanted premises by the appellant defendant and hence appellant defendant should not forcibly dispossess the respondents ..... clear that the respondents plaintiffs claimed abandonment on account of non user of the premises and alleged possession automatically coming to the respondents plaintiffs and which obviously cannot .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSarika Mahendra Sureka Vs. Mahendra and Another
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-19-2016
..... offer was made to the appellant of selecting the premises from several premises in the locality which offer she is not ready ..... restraining the appellant from remaining or entering upon the suit premises by granting the impugned order of interim mandatory injunction the ..... however appellant has not done so mere averment that suit premises were purchased out of sale proceeds of the ancestral property .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRegal Tea Depot through its Partners Vs. Altaf Abumiya Tamboli and Ano ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-18-2016
..... the shop they cannot augment their business due to short of premises and since the suit premises are adjoining premises the plaintiffs can easily increase their business and augment their business ..... of the plaint plaintiffs have specifically asserted that in order to appreciate the suit premises and premises in possession of the plaintiffs they have enclosed tentative plan along with the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKarnataka Fisheries Development Vs. The Deputy Secretary
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-06-2016
..... cases 18 the fact that the plaintiffs are licensees and that the suit schedule premises are public premises being well established and the licence period having expired the bda can recover possession ..... and connected cases and that the plaintiffs are in unauthorized occupation of the suit schedule premises the material issues raised were answered against the plaintiffs and the suits were dismissed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMadhvi Singh and Others Vs. Pavik Lifestyle Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-07-2016
..... technical objection since the defendant had started alleging himself to be the tenant in the premises the plaintiffs have also terminated the monthly tenancy of the defendant vide said notice ..... prior to the determination thereof existed and the possession of the respondent defendant of the premises became unauthorized only after determination of tenancy vide notice dated 19th october 2007 and not .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTN. Vanjimuthu Vs. The Competent Authority/ The District Revenue Office ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jul-22-2016
..... financial establishments act 1987 hereinafter called as the tnpid act thereafter possession of the hotel premises was also handed over to the petitioner while raising the order of attachment as ..... therefore as on date the petiitoner cannot claim any exclusive right and interest over the premises in question further the learned senior counsel for the third respondent vehemently opposed the argument .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s. Fraulin, Partnership Firm, rep by its Partner J. Sumitha, Chennai ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-29-2016
..... delhi development authority to the respondent under the self financing scheme the nature of the premises is admittedly residential there is no written agreement it has not been disputed that the ..... produced except the bald statement of the petitioner having regard to the nature of the premises locality and the available accommodation the dominant user would be residential rather the constraint of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial