Premises - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: premises Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 307 results (0.039 seconds)Hector Hoshang Mehta and ors. Vs. Marol Nand Dham Udyog Premises Co-op ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-19-2001
Reported in: 2002(2)BomCR67
..... the said condition since the individual gala owners got their premises insured and thus there has been sufficient or substantial compliance ..... state government which require the factory owners to insure the premises of their factories assuming that there is any such provision ..... the breaches committed by the defendants and stated in the premises our clients have instructed us to give you notice to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKiran Industrial Premises Co-op. Society Ltd. Vs. Janata Kamgar Union ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-08-2001
Reported in: 2001(3)ALLMR494; 2001(4)BomCR550; (2001)3BOMLR180; [2001(89)FLR707]; (2001)ILLJ1499Bom; 2001(4)MhLj665
..... as the owners of the industrial units or industrial galas the society has several commercial premises wherein different kind of commercial or trading activities are carried on by the owners of ..... ble court may be pleased to declare that co operative society in particular kiran industrial premises co operative society is not an establishment which can be called a commercial establishment under .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTulsiani Chambers Premises Co-operative Society Ltd. Vs. Shrikant V. G ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-22-2001
Reported in: 2001(4)ALLMR125; 2001(4)BomCR573; [2001(89)FLR565]
..... a co operative society formed by the owners of the commercial premises in the building of the society there is no dispute that ..... however in another w p no 2443 of 2000 kiran industrial premises co op society ltd v janata kamgar union reported in 2001 ..... has also deposed that there were no residential premises in the society and that all the premises were commercial establishments the manager has also .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWadala Shri Ram Industrial Premises Co-operative Society Limited Vs. K ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-11-2001
Reported in: 2001(4)ALLMR26; 2001(4)BomCR365
..... or give on care taker or leave and licence basis his her unit and or premises or any portion thereof which shall not be unreasonably withheld shall obtain permission in writing ..... let or give on caretaker or leave and licence basis his her unit and or premises or any portion thereof which shall not be unreasonably withheld shall obtain permission in writing .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRegent Chambers Premises Co-operative Society Ltd. Vs. Ito
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-25-2001
Reported in: (2002)76TTJ(Mumbai)531
..... the additions made by the assessing officer in respect of the transfer fee of office premises one consolidated order is being passed for the sake of convenience as the issue involved ..... 6 2000 for the assessment year 1993 94 and iii asstt cit v maker tower premises co op housing society ltd ita no 5771 mum of 1996 dated 15 8 2000 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRegent Chambers Premises Vs. Income Tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-25-2001
Reported in: (2002)82ITD13(Mum.)
..... regarding the additions made by the ao in respect of the transfer fee of office premises one consolidated order is being passed for the sake of convenience as the issue involved ..... june 2000 for the asst yr 1993 94 and iii asstt cit v maker tower premises co op housing society ltd ita no 5771 mum of 1996 dt 15th aug 2000 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPragji Vrindavan Premises Co-operative Society Ltd. and ors. Vs. State ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-03-2001
Reported in: AIR2002Bom6; 2001(4)BomCR748; (2001)4BOMLR578; 2002(1)MhLj298
..... years old the tenants formed a co operative society by the name of pragji vrindavan premises co operative society ltd the first petitioner which in turn purchased the property from the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPragji Vrindavan Premises Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. and ors. Vs. Sta ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-03-2001
Reported in: 2002(1)ALLMR459
..... years old the tenants formed a co operative society by the name of pragji vrindavan premises co operative society ltd the first petitioner which in turn purchased the property from the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNational Properties Ltd. Vs. Bata India Limited
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-02-2001
Reported in: AIR2001Cal177
..... dated 25th september 1958 wherein it was specifically mentioned that constructions in the said premises should be discussed with and considered by the plaintiff and plaintiff also claimed authority ..... done but then the defendant refused to execute the lease and granted lease of the premises to someone else thereafter the plaintiff commenced the proceedings for specific performance and alternatively .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMuthiah Vs. Subramaniam
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-13-2001
Reported in: (2001)3MLJ304
..... of the petitioner and the respondent who was the tenant already in the petition mentioned premises became the tenant under the petitioner after the partition decree the respondent tenant was informed ..... as documentary evidence that the petitioner is running his business in a rented premises and the petition mentioned premises alone is suitable for running his business it may be that the petitioner .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial