Premises - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: premises Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 302 results (0.072 seconds)Bima Office Premises Co-operative Society and Etc. Vs. Kalamboli Villa ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-23-2000
Reported in: AIR2001Bom83; 2001(1)MhLj806
..... of attachment against the properties of the petitioners the respondent no 1 in the above premise tried to support its demand for taxes as well as action for recovery thereof points ..... and justified failure on their part to pay the respondent no 1 in the above premise tried to support its demand for taxes as well as action for recovery thereof 1 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRajasthan Pharmacy Council, Jaipur Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-08-2000
Reported in: 2001(1)WLC722; 2001(2)WLN434
orderyadav j 1 the instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner rajasthan pharmacy council through its president sri...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMohanlal Vs. State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-22-2000
Reported in: 2000(3)MPHT435
ordershambhoo singh j 1 the petitioner accused was convicted by j m f c indore on 29 4 99 in...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKamat Hotels (i) Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-06-2000
Reported in: (2001)78ITD241(Mum.)
..... intention of the parties that the assessee shall use the premises the premises of the restaurant and food outlets only as incidental to ..... held that there was no parting of possession of the premises where the arrangement was a conducting arrangement or the arrangement ..... incidental thereto that the assessee was permitted to use the premises the consideration payable by the assessee in the form of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNylo Plast Industries P. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-29-2000
Reported in: (2002)82ITD315(Mum.)
..... on account of sale of property the purchasers were occupying the premises and were liable to pay the charges during the period of ..... that the assessee company had not become the owner of the premises the terms and conditions of the agreement were almost similar to ..... and all its articles things and other belongings from the said premises each party bearing its own costs incurred till then in such .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC. Lakshmipathi (Deceased) by L.Rs Vs. Smt. Bhanumathi and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-10-2000
Reported in: 2000(3)KarLJ121
..... there being 8 members in the family available accommodation is not sufficient and therefore leased premises is required as additional accommodation 4 bhanumathi appeared and opposed the petition contending inter ..... and its situation and the requirement pleaded by the petitioner partial eviction of the premises is also not feasible 17 in view of the reasons hereinabove stated revision petitioner .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSurinder Mohan Aggarwal Vs. Krishan Mohan Madhok
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-24-2000
Reported in: AIR2001P& H33
..... against tenant mathra dass petitioner admittedly was one of the co owners of the demised premises he preferred ejectment application under section 13 of the act before rent controller fazilka it ..... this ejectment application is set aside respondent is allowed three months time to vacate this premises and put surinder mohan aggarwal owner landlord in vacant possession thereof parties shall bear their .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTA. Geetha Vs. G. Sankaran and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-07-2000
Reported in: (2001)1MLJ390
..... demolition and reconstruction of a shopping complex that the 1st respondent has sublet the demised premises to his son the 2nd respondent without her written consent and that therefore the respondents ..... respondent to the 2nd respondent it is relevant to point out that the demised premises which is the leasehold premises was enjoyed as common leasehold right belonging to the joint family consisting of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCalcutta Municipal Corporation Vs. Sibamoy Chakraborty
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-31-2000
Reported in: (2000)3CALLT303(HC)
..... and requirement his case was that he purchased the suit premises namely premises no 56a sri gopal mullick lane calcutta 700 012 by ..... was for eviction of the appellant corporation from the suit premises belonging to the plaintiff respondent on the ground of reasonable ..... inasmuch as the present accommodation of them at a tenanted premises is insufficient and the plaintiff and his family members have .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Mira De Vs. Shri Mahendra Nath Biswas and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-28-2000
Reported in: (2000)3CALLT208(HC)
..... of annoyance nuisance and misconduct and that the plaintiff landlord does not require the suit premises reasonably as the existing accommodation is sufficient to accommodate her family accordingly a prayer ..... business of the plaintiff is in a tenanted accommodation and occupation of such tenanted premises in precarious possession and not suitable accommodation and hence it is rightly claimed that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial