Preceding - Year 2012 - Judgments

Jan 31 2012 (HC)

V. Narasimha Rao Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh,indust

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jan-31-2012

..... construction is no ground for impugning the authority of the precedent a precedent on the construction of a statute is as much ..... earlier judgment is erroneous or adherence to the rule of precedents results in manifest injustice differing from the earlier judgment is ..... analysing the statutory provision cannot be treated as a binding precedent n bhargavan pillai v state of kerala54 52 further the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 19 2012 (HC)

Mohd. MohsinuddIn Vs. the Government of A.P., Rep. by Its Prin

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jan-19-2012

..... construction is no ground for impugning the authority of the precedent a precedent on the construction of a statute is as much ..... earlier judgment is erroneous or adherence to the rule of precedents results in manifest injustice differing from the earlier judgment is ..... analysing the statutory provision cannot be treated as a binding precedent n bhargavan pillai v state of kerala54 52 further the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 25 2012 (FN)

Miller Vs. Alabama

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-25-2012

..... imposing a particular penalty and in so requiring our decision flows straightforwardly from our precedents specifically the principle of roper graham and our individualized sentencing cases that youth matters ..... life imprisonment for juvenile killers violates the eighth amendment nbsp nbsp nbsp nbsp our precedent supports this conclusion when determining whether a punishment is cruel and unusual this .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 28 2012 (FN)

National Federation of Independent Business Vs. Sebelius

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-28-2012

..... evaluating the constitutionality of the minimum coverage provision in the manner established by our precedents the chief justice relies on a newly minted constitutional doctrine the commerce power does ..... congress un der the commerce clause and the necessary and proper clause under those precedents congress may regulate economic activity that substantially affects interstate commerce united states v .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 11 2012 (FN)

Perry Vs. New Hampshire

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-11-2012

..... eyewitness identification stem from improper police arrangement that view lies in tension with our precedents more holistic conception of the dangers of suggestion and is untethered from the ..... jury not hear eyewitness testimony unless that evidence has aspects of reliability 3 our precedents refer to impermissibly unnecessarily and unduly suggestive circumstances interchangeably see e g brathwaite .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 26 2012 (HC)

Ms.Eid Parry (India) Limited Vs. the Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-26-2012

..... amount of depreciation actually allowed in relation to the said preceding previous year explanation 3 is relevant only in respect of ..... amount of depreciation actually allowed in relation to the said preceding previous year explanation 3 any allowance in respect of any ..... amalgamating company is the written down value of the immediately preceding previous year as reduced by the amount of depreciation .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 27 2012 (SC)

Re: Special Reference No. 1 of 2012 [Under Article 143(1) of the Const ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-27-2012

..... equally fallacious it was argued that the principle of stare decisis and the doctrine of precedent are generally accepted and followed as rules of judicial discipline and not jurisdictional fetters ..... not for privateinterest 10 based on the legal constitutional parameters requirements culled out in the preceding three paragraphs i shall venture an opinion on whether there are circumstances in which .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 23 2012 (HC)

G.M. Venkatareddy and Another Vs. the Deputy Commissioner, Kolar Distr ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: May-23-2012

..... the case or is put in issue may constitute a precedent and the precedent by long recognition may mature into stare decisis hellip ..... a binding principle in future cases the doctrine of binding precedent is of utmost importance in the administration of our judicial ..... in judicial pronouncements the courts have evolved the rule of precedence principle of stare decisis etc these rules and principles are .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 22 2012 (HC)

G.M. Venkatareddy and Others Vs. the Deputy Commissioner, Kolar Distri ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: May-22-2012

..... the case or is put in issue may constitute a precedent and the precedent by long recognition may mature into stare decisis hellip ..... a binding principle in future cases the doctrine of binding precedent is of utmost importance in the administration of our judicial ..... in judicial pronouncements the courts have evolved the rule of precedence principle of stare decisis etc these rules and principles are .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 07 2012 (HC)

Reliance Industries Limited and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Sep-07-2012

..... delivery point at gadimoga andhra pradesh pointing out the facts and circumstances discussed in the preceding paragraph relying upon pre existing contract with the purchaser 15 one shri p c tiwari ..... sale and the actual exportation that each link is inextricably connected with the one immediately preceding it the case of tata engineering and locomotive co ltd supra strengthens the petitioner s .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Preceding - Judgment Search Results