Preceding - Judgment Search Results

Satish Kumar Mann Vs. Mcd and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 165(2009)DLT11

order1 the present petition styled as a public interest litigation has been filed alleging that big quantity of drainage rainwater...

S and S Industries and Enterprises Ltd. Vs. Bifr

Court: Appellate Tribunal for foreign Exchange New Delhi

..... workers are working or were working thereon on any day of the preceding twelve months and provided further that in no part of such ..... the manufacturing activity is ordinarily so carried on any day of the preceding 12 months from the relevant date the hon ble delhi high ..... employees in its factories on any day during the twelve months preceding 31 3 1999 in which the accumulated losses of the appellant .....

In Re: Suresh Manharlal Mehta of Mumbai, as a Director of Star Precisi ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR2009Bom171; 2009(3)BomCR686

..... sections 8 and 21 of the presidency towns insolvency act and the doctrine of binding precedent are reconciled a view to the contrary would bring about constant confrontation especially between the ..... provisions of section 21 and the doctrine of binding precedent 37 the notice of motion is dismissed in the circumstances of this case however there .....

A.P. Civil Liberties Committee (Apclc) Rep. by Its President, Mr. S. S ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2009(1)ALT754

..... of india are gazetted appointments 162 a for reasons alike as discussed in the preceding paragraphs complaints against persons entitled to incompetence defenses such as infants sections 82 and ..... 1 167 on a careful consideration of the relevant statutory provisions the binding and persuasive precedents the normative architecture of private defense justifications generally and in the context of the .....

Amar Kumar Mahto and anr. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

Reported in: AIR2010Pat19

..... new discovery or argumentative novelty can undo or compel reconsideration or a binding precedent the precedent does not lose its authority merely because it was badly argued inadequately considered ..... under immediate consideration 13 decisions rendered perincuriam also fall outside the category of binding precedent hence decision contrary to the provisions of the act or patently erroneous are not .....

Haywood Vs. Drown

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the reasons identified above mcknett cannot be reconciled with the decisions of this court that preceded it unlike the connecticut court in second employers the alabama supreme court did not indulge ..... supra at 19 20 hostility to federal law is thus irrelevant under this court s precedent the supremacy clause is concerned only with whether there is antifederal discrimination second the majority .....

Arizona Vs. Gant

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to arrest exception notably none of the dissenters in chimel or the cases that preceded it argued that law enforcement reliance interests outweighed the interest in protecting individual constitutional ..... proposition that stare decisis may be disregarded or provides only lesser protection when the precedent that is challenged is one that sustained the constitutionality of a law enforcement practice .....

Central Bank of India Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2010]153CompCas497(SC); JT2009(3)SC216; 2009(3)SCALE451; (2009)4SCC94; (2009)12VatReporter137; (2009)21VST505(SC); JT2009(1)SC216

..... a first charge is created by statute that charge will have precedence over an existing mortgage the division bench negatived the argument that ..... by operation of law over any property that charge will have precedence over an existing mortgage emphasis added 53 in r m ..... the operation of law over any property that charge will have precedence over an existing mortgage and the decree obtained by the bank .....

Regional Director, Esi Corporation Vs. G. Sivaprasad, Proprietor, M.S. ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: (2010)ILLJ279Ker

..... persons are pazhayakunnumel kilimanoor inemployed for wages on any day of trivandrum districtthe preceding twelve months namely i hotels 2 quilon kundara chathannur kottarakkara punalur andsasthacotta in ..... are pazhayakunnumel kilimanoor inemployed for wages on any day of trivandrum district the preceding twelve months namely i hotels 2 quilon kundara chathannur kottarakkara punalur andsasthacotta in .....

Rajeshwar S/O Hiraman Mohurle (In Jail) Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2009CriLJ3816; 2009(4)MhLj483:2009(5)AIRKarR407

..... 92 ratio decidendi can act as the binding or authoritative precedent and reliance placed on mere general observations or casual expression ..... but in conformity with the settled canons of doctrine of precedent 3 the division bench of this court faced with somewhat ..... consistently followed by the supreme court the principles are binding precedent in terms of article 141 of the constitution of india .....