Preceding - Judgment Search Results

Williams Vs. Taylor, Warden

Court: US Supreme Court

..... as clearly established federal law as determined by the supreme court this court s precedent dictated that the virginia supreme court apply that test in entertaining williams ineffectiveassistance claim ..... diametrically different opposite in character or nature and mutually opposed to our clearly established precedent because we held in strickland that the prisoner need only demonstrate a reasonable .....

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Automats (India)

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2000)(72)ECC208

..... ministry of industry and has been availing of the exemption under this notification during the preceding financial year provided further that nothing contained in clause b of the first proviso shall ..... of the exemption under this notification or any of the notifications specified below during the preceding financial year all the 12 notifications specified above were rescinded on or before 1 3 .....

Moosa Hazi Patrawala Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2000)(121)ELT751TriDel

..... not be taken into account while computing the aggregate value of their clearances for the preceding year the assistant collector however did not agree with their plea and approved their ..... goods manufactured by an assessee while computing the aggregate value of his clearances during the preceding financial year before disallowing him the benefit of this notification on the ground of having .....

Mahmood Ansari Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Jaipur

..... made at any time during the period of three years immediately preceding the date on which the jurisdiction powers and authority of ..... that all those orders which were passed within three years preceding the date 1 7 85 the central administrative tribunal has ..... in relation to an order which is passed within three years preceding the conferment of powers on the central administrative tribunal therefore .....

Mitchell Vs. Helms

Court: US Supreme Court

..... thus does not create any impermissible incentive under agostini s second criterion our recent precedents particularly zobrest require us to reject respondents argument for zobrest gave no consideration ..... some government funding of secular functions performed by sectarian organizations our decisions provide no precedent for the use of public funds to finance religious activities rosenberger supra at .....

Dickerson Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... doctrine of stare decisis demands some special justification for a departure from longstanding precedent even precedent of the constitutional variety that criterion is more than met here to repeat ..... with adequate safeguards to protect precious fifth amendment rights 458 examining the history and precedent underlying the self incrimination clause to determine its applicability in this situation 476 .....

Apprendi Vs. New Jersey

Court: US Supreme Court

..... stigma associated with an offense the legislature has selected as worthy of greater punishment the preceding discussion should make clear why the state s reliance on mcmillan is likewise misplaced ..... the court finds it necessary to rely on irrelevant historical evidence to ignore our controlling precedent e g patterson and to offer unprincipled and inexplicable distinctions between its decision and .....

Sant Lal Vs. Sudakar and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR2000P& H116; (2000)125PLR73

..... hold that leave under section 92 is a mandatory condition precedent the proper procedure is for the plaintiff petitioners to file ..... accordance with the leave granted since grant of leave is condition precedent there cannot be validly instituted suit prior to the grant ..... the court to institute the suit sanctity of this condition precedent for institution of such a suit has been already discussed .....

Hill Vs. Colorado

Court: US Supreme Court

..... motion for summary judgment supported by affidavits which included a transcript of the hearings that preceded the enactment of the statute it is apparent from the testimony of both supporters and ..... importance of free discourse and the exchange of ideas in a traditional public forum our precedents have considered the level of protection afforded speech in specific locations but the rules formulated .....

Rice Vs. Cayetano

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the voting franchise it protects all persons not just members of a particular race important precedents give instruction in the instant case the amendment was quite sufficient to invalidate a ..... my view neither of these reasons overcomes the otherwise compelling similarity fully supported by our precedent between the once subjugated indigenous peoples of the continental united states and the peoples .....