Skip to content


Practitioner - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: practitioner Year: 1978 Page 1 of about 61 results (0.008 seconds)
Mar 06 1978 (FN)

Ray Vs. Atlantic Richfield Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-06-1978

ray v atlantic richfield co 435 u s 151 1978 u s supreme court ray v atlantic richfield co 435...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 20 1978 (HC)

Nirmal Chandra Dutta Vs. Girindra Narayan Roy and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jun-20-1978

Reported in: AIR1978Cal492,82CWN1026

m m dutt j 1 this rule is at the instance of the decree holder in an execution proceeding and...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 23 1978 (HC)

Nasib Singh Vs. Om Prakash and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Oct-23-1978

Reported in: AIR1979P& H96

order1 the respondent no 1 filed a petition for the ejectment of the petitioner on the grounds inter alia of...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 11 1978 (HC)

Shahul Hamid Ismail Shahbendray Patel Vs. Shri R.D. Pradhan

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-11-1978

Reported in: (1978)80BOMLR440

dharmadhikari j 1 these two criminal applications were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment as...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 23 1978 (FN)

BaldwIn Vs. Fish and Game Comm'n of Montana

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-23-1978

baldwin v fish game comm n of montana 436 u s 371 1978 u s supreme court baldwin v fish...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 23 1978 (FN)

Hutto Vs. Finney

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-23-1978

hutto v finney 437 u s 678 1978 u s supreme court hutto v finney 437 u s 678 1978...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 23 1978 (SC)

Maneka Sanjay Gandhi and anr. Vs. Rani Jethmalani

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-23-1978

Reported in: AIR1979SC468; 1979CriLJ458; (1979)4SCC167; [1979]2SCR378; 1979(11)LC120(SC)

..... in express terms disentities a detenu to appeal through a legal practitioner in any matter connected with the reference to the advisory board ..... for preventive detention can claim the right to consult a legal practitioner of his choice or be defended by him therefore it cannot ..... a detenu has the right of being represented by a legal practitioner in the proceedings before the advisory board 570 f b the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 13 1978 (SC)

Gaziabad Engineering Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. the Certifying Officer, Kanpur a ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-13-1978

Reported in: AIR1978SC769; [1978(36)FLR207]; 1978LabIC691; (1978)1SCC480; [1978]2SCR534

..... 22 1 a person arrested has the constitutional right to consult a legal practitioner concerning his arrest and a person who has been arrested as well ..... any person who is arrested the right to be defended by a legal practitioner of his choice in any trial for the crime for which he ..... denied the right to consult and to be defended by a legal practitioner of his choice in art 22 1 refer to a person who .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 30 1978 (HC)

Mysore Tobacco Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Karnataka-ii, ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: May-30-1978

Reported in: ILR1979KAR161; [1978]115ITR698(KAR); [1978]115ITR698(Karn)

..... manjula chellur a n venugopala gowda jj appearance through legal practitioner held sub section 2 of section 36 enables the engaging ..... the officer or office bearer is incidentally being a legal practitioner sub section 4 of section 36 cannot prevent such authorised ..... person incidentally being a legal practitioner from appearing for the industrial concern on facts held the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 25 1978 (HC)

G. Ravindran Nair Vs. Chairman, CochIn Port Trust

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jul-25-1978

Reported in: (1979)ILLJ94Ker

..... a request that since he was denied the assistance of a legal practitioner he may be afforded reasonable time to find out a suitable ..... enquiry officer to allow the petitioner to be represented by a legal practitioner or at least by a co employee for this purpose the ..... of any other employee but may not engage a legal practitioner for the purpose unless the person nominated by the disciplinary authority .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //