Practitioner - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: practitioner Year: 1968 Page 1 of about 55 results (0.008 seconds)Rukmani Vs. Appellate Authority Under Maharashtra Medical Practitioner ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-02-1968
Reported in: AIR1970Bom10; (1969)71BOMLR71; ILR1968Bom1445; 1969MhLJ318
..... bombay province the bombay medical act 1912 provided for the registration of allopathic medical practitioners only those who held any of the scheduled medical qualifications were entitled to have ..... examination shall be entitled to have his name entered in the register of medical practitioners maintained under the act qualifying examinations were examinations in indian systems of medicine held .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMac. Laboratories Private Ltd. Vs. American Home Products Corporation ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-14-1968
Reported in: AIR1969Cal342
p b mukharji j 1 this is a trade mark appeal under section 109 of the trade and merchandise marks...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIndian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd. Vs. their Workmen
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-08-1968
Reported in: AIR1968SC1002; [1968(17)FLR145]; 1968LabIC1229; (1969)ILLJ242SC; [1968]3SCR130
mitter j 1 this is an appeal by special leave against an award dated june 30 1967 of the third...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKailas Sizing Works Vs. Municipality of Bhivandi and Nizampur
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-18-1968
Reported in: AIR1969Bom127; (1968)70BOMLR554; ILR1969Bom564; 1968MhLJ916
nain j 1 this is a plaintiffs appeal against the judgment and decree of the learned civil judge senior division...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGodhara Borough Municipality Vs. Godhara Electricity Co. Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-20-1968
Reported in: AIR1968SC1504; [1969]39CompCas395(SC); [1969]73ITR44(SC); [1968]3SCR481
..... in express terms disentities a detenu to appeal through a legal practitioner in any matter connected with the reference to the advisory board ..... for preventive detention can claim the right to consult a legal practitioner of his choice or be defended by him therefore it cannot ..... a detenu has the right of being represented by a legal practitioner in the proceedings before the advisory board 570 f b the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPandavapura Sahakara Sakkare Karkhana Ltd. Vs. State of Mysore and ors ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-08-1968
Reported in: [1968(17)FLR425]; ILR1968KAR669; (1969)ILLJ658Kant; (1968)2MysLJ422
..... manjula chellur a n venugopala gowda jj appearance through legal practitioner held sub section 2 of section 36 enables the engaging ..... the officer or office bearer is incidentally being a legal practitioner sub section 4 of section 36 cannot prevent such authorised ..... person incidentally being a legal practitioner from appearing for the industrial concern on facts held the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDelhi Cloth and General Mills Co., Ltd. Vs. Workmen and ors. Etc.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-27-1968
Reported in: AIR1970SC919; [1970(20)FLR176]; 1970LabIC787; (1969)IILLJ755SC; [1969]2SCR307
..... 22 1 a person arrested has the constitutional right to consult a legal practitioner concerning his arrest and a person who has been arrested as well ..... any person who is arrested the right to be defended by a legal practitioner of his choice in any trial for the crime for which he ..... denied the right to consult and to be defended by a legal practitioner of his choice in art 22 1 refer to a person who .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. Nanigopal Ghose Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-06-1968
Reported in: AIR1970Cal1
..... appear from rule 13 are that the state government may appoint one or more medical practitioner or practitioners to undertake the treatment of insured persons the word appoint has been used in ..... service and who have been approved by the allocation committee the rules further contemplate a practitioners list and provision of temporary arrangements and alternative arrangements rules in part iii which .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKario @ Mansingh Malu and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Sep-10-1968
Reported in: (1969)10GLR66
..... in any law for the time being in force a legal practitioner shall not be entitled to appear in any case or proceeding ..... to allow a child offender to take assistance of a legal practitioner if it finds that in public interest legal assistance is necessary ..... in section 22 of the act that provision indicates that a legal practitioner shall not be entitled to appear in any such case notwithstanding .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMunicipal Committee, Jullundur City Vs. Shri Romesh Saggi and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-11-1968
Reported in: AIR1970P& H137
..... due inquiry and in consequence dismissed the application of the medical practitioner for a writ of certiorari singleton j was of a ..... a significant distinction between a case in which the impeached practitioner has been convicted of felony or misdemeanour and a case ..... requirements that the tribunal should be impartial and that the medical practitioner who is impugned should be given a full and fair .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial