Practitioner - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: practitioner Year: 1966 Page 1 of about 47 results (0.012 seconds)General Assurance Society Ltd. Vs. Chandumull JaIn and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-07-1966
Reported in: AIR1966SC1644; [1966]36CompCas468(SC); [1966]3SCR500
hidayatullah j 1 this appeal is taken from a judgment of the high court of calcutta july 13 and 14...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHicks Vs. District of Columbia
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-28-1966
hicks v district of columbia 383 u s 252 1966 u s supreme court hicks v district of columbia 383...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSouth Carolina Vs. Katzenbach
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-07-1966
south carolina v katzenbach 383 u s 301 1966 u s supreme court south carolina v katzenbach 383 u s...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax, Mysore Vs. the Canara Bank Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-13-1966
Reported in: AIR1967SC417; [1967]63ITR328(SC); [1967]1SCR859
..... in express terms disentities a detenu to appeal through a legal practitioner in any matter connected with the reference to the advisory board ..... for preventive detention can claim the right to consult a legal practitioner of his choice or be defended by him therefore it cannot ..... a detenu has the right of being represented by a legal practitioner in the proceedings before the advisory board 570 f b the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax, Mysore Vs. K. Krishna Rao and anr.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-21-1966
Reported in: [1967]64ITR385(KAR); [1967]64ITR385(Karn); (1967)1MysLJ46
..... manjula chellur a n venugopala gowda jj appearance through legal practitioner held sub section 2 of section 36 enables the engaging ..... the officer or office bearer is incidentally being a legal practitioner sub section 4 of section 36 cannot prevent such authorised ..... person incidentally being a legal practitioner from appearing for the industrial concern on facts held the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Gujarat Vs. Devendraprasad Mahasukhram
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Feb-14-1966
Reported in: (1967)0GLR395; (1966)IILLJ389Guj
..... carried on by paid legal assistants and where the legal practitioner really traded on the labour of his assistants this argument ..... occupation the term profit also covered remuneration received by a medical practitioner it was held that neither the term profit nor the ..... their wider sense and it included the establishments of medical practitioners and that was why a specific exemption was granted to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBharat Barrel and Drum Mfg. Co. Vs. L.K. Bose and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-05-1966
Reported in: AIR1967SC361; [1967]1SCR739
..... adultery it was bound to hear any evidence tendered by the practitioner and that having refused to hear such evidence it had not ..... which inter alia provided that the council shall call upon the practitioner to state his case and to produce evidence in support of ..... it that rule also provided that the practitioner may address the council either before or at the conclusion of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChandra Mohan (Second Temporary Civil and Sessions Judge) Vs. State of ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-21-1966
Reported in: (1966)IILLJ832All
..... appoint a member of the provincial civil service or a legal practitioner to a superior judicial office rule 3 stated notwithstanding anything ..... that a member of the provincial judicial service or a legal practitioner could be appointed to a judicial post the posts mentioned ..... open to outsiders under clause 2 of article 233 a legal practitioner with a standing of seven years can be directly appointed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri Kashi Prasad Saksena Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-06-1966
Reported in: AIR1967All173; (1967)IILLJ588All
..... as to what does the expression professional misconduct occurring in section 13 of the legal practitioners act mean their lordships observed before dealing with the charges it is right to state ..... mere negligence does not amount to professional misconduct 27 these cases being under the legal practitioners act and dealing with the question of a professional misconduct of a lawyer are relevant .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTV.G. Row Vs. N. Krishnaswami Reddy and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-09-1966
Reported in: AIR1967Mad345
..... the high court to enroll advocates vakeels and attorneys the legal practitioners act 1879 provided for the entry of advocates and vakils ..... proper persons to be pleaders of subordinate court under the legal practitioners act there were two classes 1 advocates and vakils on ..... the context of the provisions of the letters patent the legal practitioners act and the indian bar councils act if the words .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial