Power Project - Judgment Search Results
Workmen of the Rajasthan Atomic Power Project Vs. Management of Rajast ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-18-1975
Reported in: AIR1976SC441; [1976(32)FLR90]; (1976)ILLJ271SC; (1976)3SCC80; 1976(8)LC184(SC)
to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal Cum Labour Court, Jabalpur:Whether the action of the Management of Rajasthan Atomic Power Project, Post Office Anushakti, via Kota in giving a notice of change dated 20th March, 1973 under Section 9A … in the following manner. Prior to August 1, 1971 the motor vehicle drivers employed in the Rajasthan Atomic Power Project, hereinafter as the called the project, were being paid overtime allowance in accordance with the staff car Rules.
Faridabad Gas Power Project, Ntpc Ltd., Etc. Vs. Om Prakash and ors., ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-05-2009
Reported in: 2009(2)AWC1936(SC); JT2009(4)SC461; 2009(2)SCALE219; (2009)4SCC719
Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J.1. Delay condoned and leave granted in Special Leave Petitions.1.1 The appellant-Faridabad Gas Power Project, NTPCL, has filed Civil Appeal Nos. 493, 523, 520, 518, 524, 519, 522, 512, 508, 502, 504, 509, … connected appeals. By the impugned judgment, the High Court has dismissed the appeals filed by M/s. Faridabad Gas Power Project, National Thermal Power Corporation Limited, as well as by the land owners and confirmed the judgment and decree
Hindustan Power Projects (P) Ltd. Vs.gao Ji Fan & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2018
% + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:03. 04.2018 CONT.CAS(C) 490/2017 HINDUSTAN POWER PROJECTS (P) LTD........ Petitioner Through Ms.Maneesha Dhir, Mr.K.P.S.Kohli, Ms.Sharmistha Ghosh and Mr.Mahipal Singh, Advs. GAO JI FAN & … + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:03. 04.2018 CONT.CAS(C) 490/2017 HINDUSTAN POWER PROJECTS (P) LTD........ Petitioner Through Ms.Maneesha Dhir, Mr.K.P.S.Kohli, Ms.Sharmistha Ghosh and Mr.Mahipal Singh, Advs. GAO JI FAN & ORS
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Fitwell Power Project Pvt. Ltd. Vs.voith Hydro Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2019
% IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. 10.2019 + ARB.P. 603/2019 FITWELL POWER PROJECT PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through Mr. A. Karthik, Mr. Badusha S., Ms. Smrithi Suresh and Mr. Ankit Jaglan,
Aadyaarush Power Projects Pvt Ltd Vs. State Of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-20-2021
05.04.2017.6. On 16.06.2017 BESCOM approved the request of the petitioner for scheduled date of commissioning of the solar power project by 6 months on account of force majeure reasons subject to any damages to be payable and the … TECH LIMITED v. CESC AND ANOTHER (W.P.No.51365 of 2016 decided on 27-08-2019 by this Court); (v) CHENNAMANGATHIHALLI SOLAR POWER PROJECT LLP AND ANOTEHR v. BESCOM AND ANOTHER32(Appeal No.351 of 2018 decided on 14-09-2020 by the APTEL); (vi) A.U.KURESHI
Clean Max Power Projects Pvt Ltd vs State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Apr-24-2025
2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 101635 OF 2024 (LB-TAX) BETWEEN:1. CLEAN MAX POWER PROJECTS PVT. LTD.,2. CLEAN MAX IPP2 PVT. LTD., Digitally signed by AUTHORISED SIGNATORY SHWETHA.S. PREMCHANDRA M R Location: … BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 101635 OF 2024 (LB-TAX) BETWEEN:1. CLEAN MAX POWER PROJECTS PVT. LTD.,2. CLEAN MAX IPP2 PVT. LTD., Digitally signed by AUTHORISED SIGNATORY SHWETHA.S. PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH
Aravali Hydro Power Project vs Ms Thakur
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-08-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 555/2011 ARAVALI HYDRO POWER PROJECT .....AppellantversusMS THAKUR .....RespondentCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 08.04.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present
Venkateshwara Power Project Ltd., vs Shri. Ghogare Kondiba Madhav
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Feb-05-2026
OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 100563 OF 2021 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: VENKATESHWARA POWER PROJECT LTD., SUGAR FACTORY, POST. BEDAKIHAL, TQ. CHIKKODI, REPRESENTED BY SHRI. RAKESH RAMGOUDA PATIL, AGE. 42 YEARS, OCC. SERVING
Venkateshwara Power Project Limited vs Holeppa S/O Uday Yadav
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Mar-13-2024
OF 2021, 101283 OF 2021 and 101285 OF 2021 (L-RES) IN WP NO. 101268 OF 2021: BETWEEN: VENKATESHWARA POWER PROJECT LIMITED, BEDAKIHAL TALUKA NIPPANI, DISTRICT BELAGAVI-591214, R/BY MANAGING DIRECTOR, SWAROOP S/O MAHADAVRAO MAHADIK, AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC. MANAGING … DISTRICT BELAGAVI-591214, R/BY MANAGING DIRECTOR, SWAROOP S/O MAHADAVRAO MAHADIK, AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC. MANAGING DIRECTOR, RESIDING AT: VENKATESHWARA POWER PROJECT LTD., BEDKIHAL, TALUKA NIPPANI, DISTRICT BELAGAVI-591214. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. SRINIVAS B. NAIK, ADVOCATE) AND:1. HOLEPPA S/O UDAY
Venkateshwara Power Project Limited vs Mahadev S/O Datatray Mohite
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Mar-13-2024
OF 2021, 101283 OF 2021 and 101285 OF 2021 (L-RES) IN WP NO. 101268 OF 2021: BETWEEN: VENKATESHWARA POWER PROJECT LIMITED, BEDAKIHAL TALUKA NIPPANI, DISTRICT BELAGAVI-591214, R/BY MANAGING DIRECTOR, SWAROOP S/O MAHADAVRAO MAHADIK, AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC. MANAGING … DISTRICT BELAGAVI-591214, R/BY MANAGING DIRECTOR, SWAROOP S/O MAHADAVRAO MAHADIK, AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC. MANAGING DIRECTOR, RESIDING AT: VENKATESHWARA POWER PROJECT LTD., BEDKIHAL, TALUKA NIPPANI, DISTRICT BELAGAVI-591214. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. SRINIVAS B. NAIK, ADVOCATE) AND:1. HOLEPPA S/O UDAY
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free