Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Pour Over Will - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 28 2026

M/S Pouring Pounds Pvt Ltd vs Shoogloo Network Pvt Ltd (Formerly Omg N ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-28-2026

unique and extraordinary matters, and that a violation of any of the terms of such covenants and obligations will cause irreparable loss and injury to the aggrieved Party, Therefore, notwithstanding the provisions of this Agreement, either Party … * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 28.01.2026 + ARB.P. 1885/2025 M/S POURING POUNDS PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Raghav Wadhwa, Mr. Amitoj Chadha and Ms. Jahnvi Ghai, Advocates.versusSHOOGLOO NETWORK PVT


Feb 15 1996

Gharban Ali Pour Azadi Shekhar Sareoi Vs. Intelligence Officer, Air In ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-15-1996

Reported in: 1996(5)BomCR535; 1996CriLJ2420; 1996(2)MhLj839

on it earlier decision in State of Punjab v. Balbir Singh reported in : 1994CriLJ3702 to which I will presently refer. In that case, by chance recovery, two polythene packets of charas were found in the house


Jul 13 1989

Gasam Pour Karami Ligvan Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-13-1989

Reported in: 1990CriLJ523; 39(1989)DLT281; ILR1989Delhi66

this Judgment, I propose to dispose of two connected criminal writ petitions No. 82 of 1989- Shri Gasam Pour Karami Ligwan vs. Union of India and others, arid Criminal Writ petition no. 86 of 1989--Rahim Muradi vs.


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 06 2001

Hashiem Aligholi Pour Hamani and Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-06-2001

Reported in: (2002)(80)ECC414

Matched in: Parties Hashiem Aligholi Pour Hamani and Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial