Poultry - Judgment Search Results
Indian Poultry Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-22-2001
Reported in: AIR2001SC1555; [2001]250ITR664(SC); (2001)9SCC740
in this behalf. It is, therefore, not possible to conclude in the present matter that the dressing of poultry is tantamount to manufacture.3. The appeal is dismissed. 4. No order as to costs. -
Indian Poultry Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-22-2001
Reported in: (2001)166CTR(SC)503
in this behalf. It is, therefore, not possible to conclude in the present matter that the dressing of poultry is tantamount to manufacture.3. The appeal is dismissed.4. No order as to costs. -
Indian Poultry and ors. Vs. Sales Tax Officer, Rajnandgaon and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-19-1998
Reported in: (1999)9SCC162; [1999]1999STC507(SC)
the decision of the Division Bench of this Court dated 6-11-1996 in ITR No. 3 of 1996, Indian Poultry v. CIT : [1998]230ITR909(MP) , the matter is no longer res Integra. A similar controversy was raised in
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Hy Lay Poultry Farms Vs. State of Haryana
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-16-1976
Reported in: AIR1977SC685; (1976)4SCC87
Matched in: Parties Hy Lay Poultry Farms Vs. State of Haryana
Kanagam Poultry Farm Vs The State Tax officer(intelligence)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.7331 & 7334 of 2026 M/s.Kanagam Poultry Farm rep by its Proprietor, G.Elaiyappan No.514, Ponnoli Nagar, Veppanatham Vilage, Varagur Post,Attur Taluk, Salem,Tamil Nadu - 636
Tvl ANAND POULTRY FORM Vs Commercial Tax Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-25-2026
MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN WP No. 11473 of 2026 and WMP Nos.12502 & 12504 of 2026 Tvl ANAND POULTRY FORM Represented by its Proprietor Rangasamygounder Velusamy Pillaiappam Palayam Post, Avinashi, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641653. Petitioner(s) Vs1. Commercial
Kishanpura Poultry Farms Private Limited Vs. the Registrar of Companie ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-18-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.P.No.124 of 2013 Decision : 18.02.2014 Kishanpura Poultry Farms Private Limited ....Petitioner(s) Versus The Registrar of Companies, Punjab, Chandigarh and Himachal Pradesh ....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE
Three Star Poultry Farm Vs. Governmnent of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-25-2014
of 2014 in W.A.No.776 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 and 4 of 2013 in W.P.No.13320 of 2013 Three Star Poultry Farm represented by its Managing Director P.Veera Pillai 7/107-1, N.Pudupatti Trichy Main Road Namakkal Taluk 637 020.Appellant in
Soorya Poultry Farms Private Limited vs the State Tax Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-04-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 04-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and Soorya Poultry Farms Private Limited Represented by its Director Mr.Chockalingam Govindaraj No.82/197, New M.T.H.Road, Villivakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 049
inderjit Poultry Farms and ors. Vs. State Bank of Patiala and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-02-2002
Reported in: (2003)133PLR313
Matched in: Parties inderjit Poultry Farms and ors. Vs. State Bank of Patiala and ors.
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free