Pouch - Judgment Search Results
Thrishul Zarda Pouches Vs. Union Of India
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-04-2022
levying Central Excise on tobacco and tobacco products vide Annexure-‘A’ and etc. 7 IN W.P.No.713/2020 BETWEEN: Thrishul Zarda Pouches, Having its factory premises at Sy.No.2, Katha No.54, Megalahalli Road, Bommenahalli - 577 520, Chitradurga (T) & (D),
K.P. Pouches (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2008
Reported in: 2008(228)ELT31(Del)
ORDERMadan B. Lokur, J.1. The Assessee is aggrieved by an order dated 15th February, 2007 read with an order dated 27th July, 2007 [2007 (220) E.L.T. 960 (Tri.-Del.) passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax...
Dinesh Pouches Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-21-2007
Reported in: (2008)16VST387(Raj)
Rajesh Balia, J.1. The petitioner is a manufacturer of 'sada pan masala', mixed with tobacco in the brand name of Geetanjali, Zafri 2100 Gutkha, etc. The petitioner as a manufacturer is subject to excise duty and...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Dinesh Pouches Ltd. Vs. Cce
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2002
Reported in: (2003)(87)ECC195
1. This appeal has been filed against the impugned order-in-appeal dated 18.1.2002 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals).2. The facts are not much in dispute. The factory premises of the appellants were visited by the Central Excise...
Kothari Pouches Limited Vs. C.C.E.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2003
Reported in: (2003)(159)ELT927TriDel
2. The appellants filed this appeal against the adjudication order passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise. The learned Commissioner of Central Excise confirmed the demand on the ground that the appellants paid additional duty at...
Kothari Pouches Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2004
Reported in: (2004)(167)ELT181TriDel
1. In this appeal which has been filed by the appellants against the impugned order-in-appeal, the issue relates to the imposition of penalty on the appellants.2. The learned Counsel has contended that the goods had never...
Dinesh Pouches Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jul-23-2004
Reported in: (2004)(171)ELT313TriDel
1. The appellants herein are engaged in the manufacture of Pan Masala, falling under sub-headings 21 and 24 as Pan Masala both containing Tobacco as well as not containing Tobacco. They had cleared the Pan Masala...
Rati Traders Vs. K.P. Pouches Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-30-2004
Reported in: 2004(29)PTC254(MP)
J.1. By the impugned order dated 14/11/2003 District Judge, Mandleshwar in his Civil Suit No. 15-A/2003 (M/s. K.P. Pouches Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s. Rati Traders) a passing of action had granted a temporary injunction against manufacture, sale,
C.T.O.,cir.-c, Jodhpur Vs. M/S Dinesh Pouches Ltd
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER: S.B. SALES TAX REVISION PETITION NO.256/2005 C.T.O., Circle 'C', Jodhpur Vs. M/s. Dinesh Pouches Ltd. Date of Order ::23. 9.2013 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr. D.K. Godara for Mr. V.K.
M/s.balajee Pouches Vs. Union Of India
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Sep-21-2022
COPY OF THE SAID NOTIFICATION IS PRODUCED HEREWITH AS ANNEXURE-A & ETC., IN W.P. NO.146879/2020: BETWEEN: M/S. BALAJEE POUCHES, A PROPRIETARY CONCERN HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT NO.10/2A, VILLAGE MISHRIKOTI, TALUK KALGHATGI-581226, DIST: DHARWAD, REPRESENTED BY POPRIETOR,
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free