Post Office - Judgment Search Results

A. Gopalan, Deputy Postmaster, Calicut Head Post Office Vs. the Senior ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

The charges were as under:: "Article-I That the said Sri A Gopalan, while working as Postmaster, Kalpetta Head Post Office, during the period from April 2002 to 19.3.2003, failed to regulate funds in respect of Pulpalli SO, and … of CCS (Conduct) Rules 1964. Article-II That the said Sri A Gopalan, while working as Postmaster, Kalpetta Head Post Office, during the period from April 2002 to 19.3.2003, failed to report the retention of excess cash by Sub

Thomas Abraham, Gds Md, Branch Post Office, Kattakada S.O., Thiruvanan ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

applications for appointment to the post of Gramin Dak Sevak Mail Deliverer (GDSMD, for short) at Pantha Branch Post Office, the applicant has filed this O.A. to claim the benefit of Annexure A-8 letter of D.G., PandT No. … was appointed vide Annexure A-1 Memo dated 30.07.1997 as Extra Departmental Delivery Agent (EDDA, for short) Pantha Branch Post Office, from 01.08.1997 to 31.08.1997 on provisional basis. He was continued on the post on the strength of Annexure

Superintendent of Post Offices and ors. Vs. K.K. Gopalakrishnan

Court: Supreme Court of India

Matched in: Parties Superintendent of Post Offices and ors. Vs. K.K. Gopalakrishnan

Superintendent of Post Offices and ors. Vs. E. Kunhiraman Nair Muliyar

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1998(7)SC393; (1998)9SCC255

ORDER1. The respondent was temporarily and provisionally appointed as Extra Departmental Branch Postmaster for a period of four months from 9-1-1978 to 8-5-1978. The provisional appointment of the respondent was extended

Jagdambari Post Office Bachao Sangarsh Samiti and anr. Vs. Seventh Add ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1989Supp(1)SCC384

Matched in: Parties Jagdambari Post Office Bachao Sangarsh Samiti and anr. Vs. Seventh Additional District and Sessions Judge and ors.

The Check Post Officer and ors. Vs. K.P. Abdulla and Bros.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1971SC792; (1971)IIMLJ89(SC); (1970)3SCC355; [1971]2SCR817; [1971]27STC1(SC)

the State of Madras towards the border of the State of Kerala was when searched by the Check Post Officer found to carry 85 bags of foodstuffs-45 bags of maida, 20 bags of flour and 20 bags … State of Madras towards the border of the State of Kerala was when searched by the Check Post Officer found to carry 85 bags of foodstuffs-45 bags of maida, 20 bags of flour and 20 bags of

Superintendent of Post Offices vs N.Chandran Asari

Court: Kerala

NO. 6 OF 2015 AGAINST THE ORDER OA 607/2013 OF CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM BENCHPETITIONER/S: 1 SUPERINTENDENT OF POST OFFICES THIRUVANANTHAPURAM SOUTH DIVISION -695 001. 2 CHIEF POSTMASTER GENERAL KERALA CIRCLE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3 UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED … 6 OF 2015 AGAINST THE ORDER OA 607/2013 OF CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM BENCHPETITIONER/S: 1 SUPERINTENDENT OF POST OFFICES THIRUVANANTHAPURAM SOUTH DIVISION -695 001. 2 CHIEF POSTMASTER GENERAL KERALA CIRCLE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3 UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY

Superintendent of Post Offices, Pathanamthitta Division vs Regional La ...

Court: Kerala

Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, as the Postal Department is an establishment under Section 2(k) of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, and going by Section 1(3)(b) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 , it applies to … every 'establishment' within the meaning of 'any law' for the time being in force and as the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 would fall under the expression 'law' under Section 1(3)(b) of the Payment of Gratuity Act.5. The

Superintendent of Post Offices vs Regional Labour Commissioner (Centra ...

Court: Kerala

Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, as the Postal Department is an establishment under Section 2(k) of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, and going by Section 1(3)(b) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 , it applies to … every 'establishment' within the meaning of 'any law' for the time being in force and as the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 would fall under the expression 'law' under Section 1(3)(b) of the Payment of Gratuity Act.5. The

Superintendent of Post Offices Kollam Division vs Regional Labour Comm ...

Court: Kerala

Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, as the Postal Department is an establishment under Section 2(k) of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, and going by Section 1(3)(b) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 , it applies to … every 'establishment' within the meaning of 'any law' for the time being in force and as the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 would fall under the expression 'law' under Section 1(3)(b) of the Payment of Gratuity Act.5. The