Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Possession - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 25 2013

“1. Whether the Plaintiff Is the Owner in Possession of the Property ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-25-2013

Rs.No.2408 o”2. sister’s sons namely Basta Singh and Mahboob. It is alleged that the plaintiff is not in possession of the suit property and is residing in another property. The plaintiff filed rejoinder and on the basis


Nov 27 2012

“that Neither the Plaintiff Is Owner in Possession of the Suit Land ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Nov-27-2012

The petitioners have earlier filed Civil Suit for permanent injunction for restraining the defendants from taking over the possession of the land measuring 7 Kanal 5 Marla. A copy of the plaint has been appended with the


Dec 13 2012

Right to Seek Possession Especially Since NaraIn Dass Vs. Krishan Lal ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Dec-13-2012

is contended that the respondent has no Civil Revision No.650 of 2012 (O&M) - 2- right to seek possession especially since Narain Dass had also been examined as a witness by the tenant. This fact has not


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 01 2013

as Per the Pleaded Case of the Petitioner Herself She Possesses Vs. St ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-01-2013

subject and BT/B.Ed with Sanskrit as teaching subject. As per the pleaded case of the petitioner herself, she possesses the B.A Degree with Sanskrit as an elective subject as per Annexure P-2 and CWP No.18839 of 2011(O&M)


Feb 15 2013

“that the Petitioner Society Own and Possess Property Vs. M/S Basant ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-15-2013

stage, evidence was being lead petitioner sought to add the following amendment:- “That the petitioner society own and possess property not ID/14 NIT Faridabad property sub division No.6 at Bata “B”. Colony, NIT, Faridabad and property IA/113,


Feb 15 2013

“that the Petitioner Society Own and Possess Property Vs. M/S Surend ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-15-2013

stage, evidence was being lead petitioner sought to add the following amendment:- “That the petitioner society own and possess property not ID/14 NIT Faridabad property sub division No.6 at Bata “B”. Colony, NIT, Faridabad and property IA/113,


Feb 15 2013

“that the Petitioner Society Own and Possess Property Vs. M/S Bakshi ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-15-2013

stage, evidence was being lead petitioner sought to add the following amendment:- “That the petitioner society own and possess property not ID/14 NIT Faridabad property sub division No.6 at Bata “B”. Colony, NIT, Faridabad and property IA/113,


Feb 15 2013

“that the Petitioner Society Own and Possess Property Vs. M/S Kiddie ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-15-2013

stage, evidence was being lead petitioner sought to add the following amendment:- “That the petitioner society own and possess property not ID/14 NIT Faridabad property sub division No.6 at Bata “B”. Colony, NIT, Faridabad and property IA/113,


Mar 11 2014

Whether the Plaintiff Is Exclusive Owner in Possession of the Vs. Gene ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Mar-11-2014

judgment and decree passed by the Courts below, whereby suit for declaration that she is exclusive owner in possession of the property in question was dismissed. The plaintiff claimed herself to be the daughter of the defendant


Apr 07 2014

“1. the Allegation Is That the Petitioner Was Found in Possession of ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Apr-07-2014

2014 2 4. According to the prosecution that on 30.8.2013, three injections of Norgesic were recovered from the possession of the petitioner, whereas five injections of Norgesic each, were recovered from his other co-accused. There is no


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial