Ports Act 1908 Section 5 - Judgment Search Results
Visakhapatnam Port Trust, Visakhapatnam Vs. Commerical Tax Officer, In ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-05-2001
Reported in: 2001(5)ALD76
under the Major Port Trust Act, 1963. It is also a Port within the meaning of Indian Port Act, 1908. It is charged with the duties and functions enumerated in the above two enactments. To be specific and … The short question that arises for decision in this writ petition is whether the activity of the Visakhapatnam Port Trust, the petitioner herein, in selling drinking water to various ships stationed in the waters of Visakhapatnam Port … can be treated as 'business' within the meaning of that term in Section 2(lXbbb) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957.2. This question … Nadu v. Board of Trustees of the Port of Madras, 114 STC 520 and the judgment of this Court in Board Trustees of Visakhapatnam Port
V.G. Row Vs. the State of Madras
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-14-1950
Reported in: AIR1951Mad147; (1951)IMLJ628
Clause (k); Rubber Production and Marketing Act (XXIV [24] of 1947), Section 3 (1), Clause (v); the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (xv [15] of 1908), Section 3, Clause (8) ; Madras Act XIV [14] of 1947 Section 2, Clause … The assocn. owns a house, No. 4, Rundall's Road, Vepery, which was purchased for a sum of Rs. 55,000 in or about 29-11-1947. The Society placed an order for the purchase of rotary printing press which arrived
Villianur Iyarkkai Padukappu Maiyam Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-14-2009
Reported in: JT2009(8)SC339; (2009)7SCC561; 2009(8)LC3627(SC); [2009] 9 SCR 225
ports can be undertaken by the respective State Government after formulating its own guidelines and modalities. The Indian Ports Act, 1908 permits the State Government to develop the minor ports. By virtue of power vested in the Parliament by … not justified in pressing into service those provisions. An attempt was made to demonstrate that in terms of Section 5 of the Pondicherry (Administration) Act, 1962 all properties and assets in the State of Pondicherry vest with the
18-section briefs on any result in this list
V.M. Salgaocar and Bros. Vs. Board of Trustees of Port of Mormugao and ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-31-2005
Reported in: AIR2005SC4138; 2005(5)BomCR374; JT2005(3)SC607; (2005)140PLR743; (2005)4SCC613; [2005] 3 SCR 27
guaranteed under Article 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.41. In the end Mr. Nariman submitted that the Indian Ports Act, 1908 was still applicable to various ports including Panjim Port in Goa. In the case of exporters like the … 90 days. Article 134 to 137 providing for longer periods of limitation are an exception to the rule. Section 5 of the Limitation Act allows for condonation of delay in filing the appeals or applications but not suit.
Delta Engineers Vs. State of Goa and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-22-2009
Reported in: 2009AIRSCW4319; JT2009(9)SC142; 2009(8)SCALE685; (2009)12SCC110
(Amendment) Rules, 1992 and Rule 54A of the Goa Ports (Amendment) Rules, 1994 were ultra vires the Indian Ports Act, 1908; (b) for quashing the demand for rental charges by letter dated 1.11.1993; and (c) for a direction to … for a declaration that the Goa Ports (Amendment) Rules, 1992 and Rule 54A of the Goa Ports (Amendment) Rules, 1994 were ultra vires the Indian … which the Act is extended by the Government in exercise of the power conferred under the Act (vide Section 1(2) of the Act). Section 3 contains the definitions and Clause (4) thereof defines `port' as including also
Jayantilal Dharamsi and ors. Vs. Board of Trustees of Port of Bombay
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-01-1990
Reported in: 1991(2)BomCR283; (1990)92BOMLR596
upon the declaration about the limits of the Port of Bombay issued under section 5 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908. Now so far as this notification dated 28th October, 1972 issued by the Government of India in the
M/S. Shreeji Shipping Vs. C.C.E. and S.T. Rajkot
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad
Decided on: Apr-09-2014
are concerned in this case is being rendered in a minor port to which the provisions of Indian Ports Act, 1908 and Gujarat Maritime Board Act, 1981 are applicable is also a distinction which is untenable as grant of … 65(9) and 65(10) (9)."banking" and banking company shall have the meanings assigned to them in clauses (b) of section 5 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of 1949), (10). banking and other financial services means, the following
Board of Trustees of the Visakhapatnam Port Trust Vs. Commercial Tax O ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-17-1977
Reported in: [1979]43STC36(AP)
of the Parliament which have a bearing on the question at issue before us. One is the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (Act 15 of 1908), and the other is the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 (Act 38 of 1963). … tax can be decided, it must first be found that the proposed assessee is a dealer, because under Section 5 of the Act, levy of tax on sales or purchases of goods is only in respect of the
Paradeep Port Trust. Vs. Controlling Authority and ors.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: May-22-2010
'major port' has the same meaning assigned to it in clause (8) of Section 3 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908, hereinafter referred to as the I.P. Act. The said Section 2 of clause 'n' defines 'port' has the … under the Act. Such provision is to be effective from the date as notified by the appropriate Government. Section 5 of the Act provides that the appropriate Government may, by notification, and subject to conditions as may be
M/S.Creative Infrastructure, Vs. the Government of Puducherry, and ors ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-08-2010
Government of Puducherry has no right to execute the project contrary to the power vested in the Indian Ports Act, 1908. 18.With reference to the jurisdiction of the Government of Puducherry, reliance was placed upon the judgment of the … deposit is without authority of law and without any binding contract between the parties and also contrary to Section 5 of the Contract Act; and (b) whether the writ petition is maintainable in a claim arising out of
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free