Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Ports Act 1908 Section 5 - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 05 2001

Visakhapatnam Port Trust, Visakhapatnam Vs. Commerical Tax Officer, In ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jul-05-2001

Reported in: 2001(5)ALD76

under the Major Port Trust Act, 1963. It is also a Port within the meaning of Indian Port Act, 1908. It is charged with the duties and functions enumerated in the above two enactments. To be specific and … The short question that arises for decision in this writ petition is whether the activity of the Visakhapatnam Port Trust, the petitioner herein, in selling drinking water to various ships stationed in the waters of Visakhapatnam Port … can be treated as 'business' within the meaning of that term in Section 2(lXbbb) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957.2. This question … Nadu v. Board of Trustees of the Port of Madras, 114 STC 520 and the judgment of this Court in Board Trustees of Visakhapatnam Port


Sep 14 1950

V.G. Row Vs. the State of Madras

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-14-1950

Reported in: AIR1951Mad147; (1951)IMLJ628

Clause (k); Rubber Production and Marketing Act (XXIV [24] of 1947), Section 3 (1), Clause (v); the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (xv [15] of 1908), Section 3, Clause (8) ; Madras Act XIV [14] of 1947 Section 2, Clause … The assocn. owns a house, No. 4, Rundall's Road, Vepery, which was purchased for a sum of Rs. 55,000 in or about 29-11-1947. The Society placed an order for the purchase of rotary printing press which arrived


May 14 2009

Villianur Iyarkkai Padukappu Maiyam Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-14-2009

Reported in: JT2009(8)SC339; (2009)7SCC561; 2009(8)LC3627(SC); [2009] 9 SCR 225

ports can be undertaken by the respective State Government after formulating its own guidelines and modalities. The Indian Ports Act, 1908 permits the State Government to develop the minor ports. By virtue of power vested in the Parliament by … not justified in pressing into service those provisions. An attempt was made to demonstrate that in terms of Section 5 of the Pondicherry (Administration) Act, 1962 all properties and assets in the State of Pondicherry vest with the


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 31 2005

V.M. Salgaocar and Bros. Vs. Board of Trustees of Port of Mormugao and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-31-2005

Reported in: AIR2005SC4138; 2005(5)BomCR374; JT2005(3)SC607; (2005)140PLR743; (2005)4SCC613; [2005] 3 SCR 27

guaranteed under Article 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.41. In the end Mr. Nariman submitted that the Indian Ports Act, 1908 was still applicable to various ports including Panjim Port in Goa. In the case of exporters like the … 90 days. Article 134 to 137 providing for longer periods of limitation are an exception to the rule. Section 5 of the Limitation Act allows for condonation of delay in filing the appeals or applications but not suit.


Apr 22 2009

Delta Engineers Vs. State of Goa and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-22-2009

Reported in: 2009AIRSCW4319; JT2009(9)SC142; 2009(8)SCALE685; (2009)12SCC110

(Amendment) Rules, 1992 and Rule 54A of the Goa Ports (Amendment) Rules, 1994 were ultra vires the Indian Ports Act, 1908; (b) for quashing the demand for rental charges by letter dated 1.11.1993; and (c) for a direction to … for a declaration that the Goa Ports (Amendment) Rules, 1992 and Rule 54A of the Goa Ports (Amendment) Rules, 1994 were ultra vires the Indian … which the Act is extended by the Government in exercise of the power conferred under the Act (vide Section 1(2) of the Act). Section 3 contains the definitions and Clause (4) thereof defines `port' as including also


Oct 01 1990

Jayantilal Dharamsi and ors. Vs. Board of Trustees of Port of Bombay

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-01-1990

Reported in: 1991(2)BomCR283; (1990)92BOMLR596

upon the declaration about the limits of the Port of Bombay issued under section 5 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908. Now so far as this notification dated 28th October, 1972 issued by the Government of India in the


Apr 09 2014

M/S. Shreeji Shipping Vs. C.C.E. and S.T. Rajkot

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

Decided on: Apr-09-2014

are concerned in this case is being rendered in a minor port to which the provisions of Indian Ports Act, 1908 and Gujarat Maritime Board Act, 1981 are applicable is also a distinction which is untenable as grant of … 65(9) and 65(10) (9)."banking" and banking company shall have the meanings assigned to them in clauses (b) of section 5 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of 1949), (10). banking and other financial services means, the following


Jun 17 1977

Board of Trustees of the Visakhapatnam Port Trust Vs. Commercial Tax O ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jun-17-1977

Reported in: [1979]43STC36(AP)

of the Parliament which have a bearing on the question at issue before us. One is the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (Act 15 of 1908), and the other is the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 (Act 38 of 1963). … tax can be decided, it must first be found that the proposed assessee is a dealer, because under Section 5 of the Act, levy of tax on sales or purchases of goods is only in respect of the


May 22 2010

Paradeep Port Trust. Vs. Controlling Authority and ors.

Court: Orissa

Decided on: May-22-2010

'major port' has the same meaning assigned to it in clause (8) of Section 3 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908, hereinafter referred to as the I.P. Act. The said Section 2 of clause 'n' defines 'port' has the … under the Act. Such provision is to be effective from the date as notified by the appropriate Government. Section 5 of the Act provides that the appropriate Government may, by notification, and subject to conditions as may be


Jun 08 2010

M/S.Creative Infrastructure, Vs. the Government of Puducherry, and ors ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-08-2010

Government of Puducherry has no right to execute the project contrary to the power vested in the Indian Ports Act, 1908. 18.With reference to the jurisdiction of the Government of Puducherry, reliance was placed upon the judgment of the … deposit is without authority of law and without any binding contract between the parties and also contrary to Section 5 of the Contract Act; and (b) whether the writ petition is maintainable in a claim arising out of


Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial