Portion - Judgment Search Results

Doddabasappa Basappa Belavigi Vs. Gadigeppa Veerappa Nelogal (Deceased ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2003KAR2987; 2004(2)KarLJ251

majage j 1 the question of law for consideration in this appeal is whether the 2nd alienee plaintiff is entitled...

Swarnamoyee Singh and ors. Vs. Nomita Singh and ors.

Court: Patna

r n prasad j 1 the letters patent appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 1 2...

Narinder Nath Sharma Vs. Smt. Shanit Devi and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2003VIIAD(Delhi)595; 107(2003)DLT574; 2003(71)DRJ64

manmohan sarin j 1 the defendant no 3 has moved the present applications on 18th september 2002 for setting aside...

Master Pulkit Vs. Smt. Kamlesh and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2003VAD(Delhi)541; 105(2003)DLT313; 2003(69)DRJ672

vikramajit sen j suit no 1763 98 is no 7272 98 3911 03 1479 02 11158 011 this suit for...

Sri Premendra Kr. Mitra Vs. Amarendra Kr. Mitra

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (2003)3CALLT369(HC),2005(4)CHN245

..... the plaintiff when started construction of the second floor on his portion the defendant motivatedly and with mala fide intention lodged a ..... to the peaceful enjoyment of the plaintiff in respect of his portion of the suit property subsequently through a notice dated 23 ..... plaintiff started construction on the first floor situated at the back portion of the suit premises out of his own fund exclusively .....

Coromandel Fertilisers Limited Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Reported in: (2004)90ITD344(Hyd.)

..... while the vehicles furniture and office equipment constituted only negligible portion of the assets as assessee executed a separate sale deed ..... pointed out that the assessee itself knew that a substantial portion of sale consideration of rs 105 3 crores is ..... further explained that the transferee company had to allocate some portion of the sale consideration to the depreciable assets for the .....

Joint Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Poddar Projects Ltd.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Reported in: (2004)88ITD247Cal

..... rate on land amp building where such land amp building or portion thereof is used for commercial or non residential purposes section ..... is levied on consolidated rate on such land amp building or portion thereof which are used for commercial or non residential purposes ..... the liability towards the surcharge also in this respect the following portion of the order passed by the hearing officer would be .....

Joint Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Poddar Projects. Ltd.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Reported in: (2004)270ITR73(Kol.)

..... rate on land amp building where such land amp building or portion thereof is used for commercial or non residential purposes section ..... is levied on consolidated rate on such land amp building or portion thereof which are used for commercial or non residential purposes ..... the liability towards the surcharge also in this respect the following portion of the order passed by the hearing officer would be .....

McConnell Vs. Federal Election Comm'n

Court: US Supreme Court

..... cannot use hard money transferred from other party committees to cover the hard money portion of a levin amendment expenditure furthermore national committees federal candidates and federal officeholders ..... infirmities are found in the implementing regulations rather than the statute itself the portions of the district court judgment rejecting plaintiffs challenges to bcra 214 are affirmed .....

Ayodhiraman Vs. Subramaniam,

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2003(3)CTC81; (2003)2MLJ316

..... a separate and independent building without reference to the other portion or portions of the building where it is not necessary to treat ..... premises described in the rent control original petition which is a portion of door no 66 in big sowrashtra street woraiyur tiruchy ..... woraiyur tiruchy town in which the demised premises is a portion the present petition has been filed by the revision petitioner .....