Skip to content


Portion - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: portion Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 302 results (0.07 seconds)
Aug 06 2002 (HC)

Nawab Ali Vs. Reyaz Ahmed and ors.

Court: Patna

Decided on: Aug-06-2002

ashok kumar verma j 1 this miscellaneous appeal has been filed against the order dated 24 7 1998 passed by...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 04 2002 (HC)

Md. Nurul Haque Khan Vs. Md. Mustafa Khan and ors.

Court: Patna

Decided on: Apr-04-2002

radha mohan prasad j 1 this appeal is directed against the judgment of affirmance passed in title appeal no 23...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 18 2002 (HC)

Anuragi Devi Vs. Haribansh NaraIn Singh and ors.

Court: Patna

Decided on: Jul-18-2002

ashok kumar verma j 1 this miscellaneous appeal has been filed by plaintiff no 1 anuragi devi against the order...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 31 2002 (HC)

Bibi Ajarsan and ors. Vs. Gayasuddin

Court: Patna

Decided on: Jul-31-2002

radha mohan prasad j 1 this appeal at the instance of defendants 1 to 3 is directed against the judgment...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 04 2002 (HC)

Yashpal Vs. Ram Bilas and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Oct-04-2002

Reported in: (2003)133PLR804

..... cannot compensate the loss of the party which gets the rear portion of the shop the report of local commissioner for partition of ..... horizontally by giving compensation to the person who gets the rear portion of the shop he further submitted that partition ordered by the ..... accommodation among themselves he cannot object to the transfer of any portion of the property in favour of the other co sharer in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 25 2002 (TRI)

Network Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on: Oct-25-2002

Reported in: (2003)84ITD67(Delhi)

..... the debentures were rightly allowed by the ao whereas the proportionate expenses incurred towards convertible portion into shares could not be allowed as deduction 7 we have considered the rival ..... to the issue of share capital the learned departmental representative has also referred to relevant portions of the prospectus and other connected documents to emphasize relevant facts of the case .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 06 2002 (HC)

Narayana Rao Patalay (Died) Per L.Rs. and 3 ors. Vs. Naresh Thapper an ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jun-06-2002

Reported in: 2003(6)ALD16; 2003(2)ALT110

..... the deceased without starting the charitable clinic conceived by him in the portion shown as godown and store in ex p7 after it was ..... occupation of the entire ground floor area except the godown and store portion shown in ex p7 on vacation of the godown and stores ..... to the deceased for his letting out the godown and store portion in ex p7 to dyanora associates after vacation by hoechst company .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 10 2002 (HC)

K.B. Sharma and anr. Vs. Vikram Loomba, District Attorney

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Dec-10-2002

Reported in: (2003)133PLR830

..... were tenants not only in the premises in dispute residential portion on the first floor but also the other accommodation shops ..... act seeking ejectment of the petitioner tenants from the residential portion of the demised premises would not be maintainable and the ..... rent controller ordering ejectment of he petitioner tenants from the residential portion on the first floor is liable to be set aside .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 01 2002 (HC)

M. Navamani Vs. A.S.A. Arumugham

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-01-2002

Reported in: (2002)2MLJ314

..... a separate and independent building without reference to the other portion or portions of the building where it is not necessary to treat ..... which the revision petitioner is in occupation as tenant the rear portion of the building in which demised premises situate was vacated ..... petitioner it is admitted in the petition that the said rear portion of the building is in the occupation of the respondent .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 10 2002 (HC)

Bhaskar Aditya Vs. Smt. Minati Majumdar and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Oct-10-2002

Reported in: AIR2003Cal178,(2003)2CALLT463(HC),2004(1)CTLJ76(Cal)

..... into being with proportionate share in the land occupying defined portion of a building comprising of a flat together with right ..... and are supporting it claiming interest only in the owners portion secured by the development agreement it has been specifically pointed ..... them and therefore they are entitled to mutation of this portion in theirname separating it from the amalgamatedplot 19 1 however .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //