Portion - Judgment Search Results

Gurcharan Singh Vs. the State of Haryana and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1974P& H223

pritam singh pattar j 1 this is a writ petition under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india...

B.S. Vohra Vs. Risal Singh

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1974CriLJ177; 9(1973)DLT215; 1973RLR364

pritam singh safeer j 1 this petition is preferred against the order made by an additional sessions jujge delhi on...

Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Anand Sarup

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1974CriLJ192

pritam singh safeer j 1 this petition preferred under sections 435 439 of the criminal procedure code is moved against...

Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru and ors.Vs. State of Kerala and anr ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1973SC1461; (1973)4SCC225; [1973]SuppSCR1

..... various constitution express limitations were put on amending certain provisions of the constitution the portion of the note relating to the constitution of australia indicated such limitations 866 the ..... the latter implies that the ultimately sovereign people have inferentially deprived themselves of that portion of their sovereign power once possessed by them of determining the content of their .....

Dhool Singh Vs. Smt. Bardhu Bai and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1974Raj90; 1973()WLN47

..... village antah district kota 2 acrording to the plaintiff the house in question in a portion of which defendant respondent kishore singh now represented by his legal representatives was living belonged ..... plaintiff to the defendant for residential purposes the learned munsif negatived the assertion regarding the portion of the house being obtained by the defendant from the plaintiff in lieu of the .....

R. M. Ar. R.M. Ramanathan Chettiar Alias R.M. A.R. Ramanathan Chettiar ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1974)1MLJ221

..... have now to be appropriated only towards the principal the portion of the principal outstanding will always be smaller than the ..... principal amount minus all payments the principal amount and the portion of the principal amount outstanding and provides that the smaller ..... those payments have been appropriated towards the principal since that portion of the principal amount will be smaller than twice the .....

Keyes Vs. School Dist. No. 1

Court: US Supreme Court

..... that where school authorities have effectuated an intentionally segregative policy in a meaningful portion of the school system similar impermissible considerations have motivated their actions in other ..... to include compulsory student transportation went well beyond the mere remedying of that portion of school segregation for which former state segregation laws were ever responsible moreover .....

Epa Vs. Mink

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the agency in question to go through the suppressed document and make the portion by portion classification to facilitate the excerpting as required by the executive order section 552 ..... unnecessary classification under the old executive order was the practical impossibility of discerning which portions of a classified document actually required classification incorporation of any material from a .....

Sheo Nath Seth Vs. Smt. Krishna Kumari Devi

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1973All496

..... the plaintiff was not entitled to obtain possession of any specific portion of the house in dispute by ejectment of the defendant ..... in that house and it appears that they occupied different portion of the said house in pursuance of some mutual arrangement ..... defendant because that would amount to seeking possession of any specific portion of the house by ejectment of the defendant therefrom without .....

Dr. Vijay Kumar and ors. Vs. Raghbir Singh Anokh Singh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1973SC2254; (1973)2SCC597

..... the second and third appellants are in exclusive possession of their portion hence he has come to the conclusion that the first ..... and that the first appellant has parted with possession of that portion to them the rejection by the rent controller of the ..... second and third appellants were in permissive possession of the half portion if the appellants had taken this plea in their written statement .....