Porcelainized - Judgment Search Results

PorcelaIn Electrical Mfg. Co. Vs. Collector of Central Excise, New Del ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1998(98)ELT583(SC); (1998)9SCC637

the period which was beyond six months from the date the duty was paid. 2. Various items of porcelain manufactured by the appellant for use as components of insulating device were assessed to duty under Tariff Item

PorcelaIn India (P.) Ltd. Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court: Guwahati

Ranjan Gogoi, J. 1. The writ petitioner, a Private Limited Company, is a dealer registered under the Assam Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1956 (since repealed). Claiming to be an exempted unit under the 1982 Industrial Policy...

Klayman Porcelains Limited Vs. Superintending Engineer, Operation, Mah ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2001(5)ALD732; 2001(5)ALT274

S.B. Sinha, C.J. 1. Two questions as regard interpretation of the provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 26 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 (for short the '1910 Act') vis-a-vis condition Nos.22.1.2 and 22.2.3. in the...

Bharat PorcelaIn Vs. the Labour Court and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (1999)121PLR701

a narrow compass may first be noticed.3. Respondents 2 to 38 were in the employment of M/s Bharat Porcelain Limited, Sonepat (for short the 'management') and their services were terminated in the year 1989. This gave rise

Lakshmi Porcelains Ltd. Vs. Union of India,

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1995IVAD(Delhi)291; 1995(35)DRJ182

D.P. Wadhwa, J. (1) The petitioner in this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution has challenged the constitutional validity of section 20 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (for short...

PorcelaIn Crafts and Components Exim Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Cus.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 1998(102)ELT11(Cal)

ORDER1. There shall be an order in terms of prayer (a) of the petition.2. By this stay petition the appellants prayed that operation of the judgment and order dated 27th February, 1998, passed by the learned...

Bengal PorcelaIn Co. Ltd. Vs. Pottery Workers' Union and Ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1962)IILLJ57Cal

D.N. Sinha, J.1. The petitioner In this case is Bengal Porcelain Company, Ltd., a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act. By an order dated 20 August 1957 passed

Anchor PorcelaIn Works Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1996)(83)ELT152Tri(Mum.)bai

1. All the aforesaid nine appeals have been filed against the same Order-in-Appeal No. 157 to 165/95 (66 to 74-Raj) CE/Collr (A)/Ahd, dated 27-3-1995 of the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Bombay.2. The facts are not...

Klayman Porcelains Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Reported in: (1984)8ITD265(Hyd.)

1. This is an appeal filed by Klayman Porcelains Ltd. of Hyderabad as statutory agents for Karamische Industries of Berlin, West Germany, for the assessment year 1980-81.2.

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Klayman Porcelains Ltd.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [1998]229ITR735(AP)

company, within the meaning of the provisions of section 9(1)(vi) ?' 2. In the assessment year 1980-81, Klayman Porcelains Ltd., Hyderabad, hereinafter referred to as the Indian company, which has been treated as statutory agents for Keramische