Poppy - Judgment Search Results

Poppy Mattress Private Limited vs the State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT APPEAL NO. 1253 OF 2026 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN:1. POPPY MATTRESS PRIVATE LIMITEDNO. 283/1B, SUKKAMPATTI REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR S/O LATE VARADHARAJAN AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS MANAGING

Baljeet Malik @ Poppy vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)

Court: Delhi

for R-1 Mr. Amit Kumar with Ms. Meenakshi Dutta, Advocate for R-2. With CRL.A.840/2016 + BALJEET MALIK @ POPPY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Kumar with Ms. Meenakshi Dutta, Advocates. + Versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF

Prima Poppy V.M. vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MAY 2022 / 4TH JYAISHTA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 3932 OF 2022 PETITIONERS:1 PRIMA POPPY V.M. HIGH SCHOOL TEACHER (ENGLISH), ST.LOUIS HIGH SCHOOL, MUNDAMVELI P.O., ERNAKULAM - 682 507. 2 LINSHA THOLAT SEBASTIN

Akash @ Poppy vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

1943 BAIL APPL. NO. 4638 OF 2021 CRIME NO.284/2021 OF VALLIKUNNAM POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT PETITIONER/S: AKASH @ POPPY AGED 20 YEARS S/O.AJAYAN, AISHWARYA VEEDU, ILLIPPAKULAM MURI, VALLIKUNNAM VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT - 690 501. BY ADVS. RASHEED

Faisal @ Poppy Faisal, vs State of Kerala,

Court: Kerala

43/2013 of PINCIPAL ASSISTANT SESSIONS COURT,IRINJALAKUDA CRIME NO. 1179/2018 OF Kodungallur Police Station , Thrissur PETITIONER/S: FAISAL @ POPPY FAISAL, AGED 33 YEARS, S/O ABDUL KADER, NEDIYAPARAMBIL HOUSE, KANDAMKULAM DESOM, METHALA VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY

Harjeet Singh @ Poppy and Sudhadhar @ Sofi @ Sudhakar Vs. State

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2003CriLJ2151; 103(2003)DLT217; 2003(67)DRJ46

are being disposed of by this judgment.2. The learned Additional Sessions Judge convicted the appellant Harjeet Singh @ Poppy under Section 302 IPC and sentenced him to undergo life imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs. 5,000/-

Poppy Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: RLW2003(3)Raj1507; 2002(5)WLC330; 2002(4)WLN53

one and no further leniency is required.For the reasons stated above, the appeal filed by the accused appellant Poppy Singh is liable to be dismissed and the same is hereby dismissed, after confirming the judgment and order

Poppys Spinning Mills (P) Ltd., Rep. by Authorised Agent, P. Murugan V ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: III(2005)BC231; [2005]128CompCas769(Mad); 2005(1)CTC677

M. Chockalingam, J.1. This appeal has arisen from the judgment of the learned Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court No. V), Coimbatore at Tirupur, reversing the judgment of the trial Court namely the Court of the...

Poppy Corporation Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax, UjjaIn Divisio ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: [1987]65STC360(MP)

of India filed by the petitioner-assessee which is a registered partnership firm. The petitioner-firm is a dealer of poppy husk and poppy seeds duly registered under the provisions of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. For the

Poppi Reddy and anr. Vs. Ellammal and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1996)2MLJ636

Srinivasan, J.1. The only question in this appeal is whether under Ex.A-1 the legatee gets absolute estate or a life estate over the property bequeathed to her. One Mandaiyan @ Siddhi Reddy executed Ex.A-1 on 14.5.1948...