Poppy - Judgment Search Results
Baljeet Malik @ Poppy vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-04-2018
for R-1 Mr. Amit Kumar with Ms. Meenakshi Dutta, Advocate for R-2. With CRL.A.840/2016 + BALJEET MALIK @ POPPY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Kumar with Ms. Meenakshi Dutta, Advocates. + Versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF
Harjeet Singh @ Poppy and Sudhadhar @ Sofi @ Sudhakar Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2002
Reported in: 2003CriLJ2151; 103(2003)DLT217; 2003(67)DRJ46
are being disposed of by this judgment.2. The learned Additional Sessions Judge convicted the appellant Harjeet Singh @ Poppy under Section 302 IPC and sentenced him to undergo life imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs. 5,000/-
Poppy Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Oct-08-2001
Reported in: RLW2003(3)Raj1507; 2002(5)WLC330; 2002(4)WLN53
one and no further leniency is required.For the reasons stated above, the appeal filed by the accused appellant Poppy Singh is liable to be dismissed and the same is hereby dismissed, after confirming the judgment and order
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Poppys Spinning Mills (P) Ltd., Rep. by Authorised Agent, P. Murugan V ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-07-2005
Reported in: III(2005)BC231; [2005]128CompCas769(Mad); 2005(1)CTC677
M. Chockalingam, J.1. This appeal has arisen from the judgment of the learned Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court No. V), Coimbatore at Tirupur, reversing the judgment of the trial Court namely the Court of the...
Poppy Corporation Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax, UjjaIn Divisio ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-06-1986
Reported in: [1987]65STC360(MP)
of India filed by the petitioner-assessee which is a registered partnership firm. The petitioner-firm is a dealer of poppy husk and poppy seeds duly registered under the provisions of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. For the
Poppi Reddy and anr. Vs. Ellammal and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-11-1996
Reported in: (1996)2MLJ636
Srinivasan, J.1. The only question in this appeal is whether under Ex.A-1 the legatee gets absolute estate or a life estate over the property bequeathed to her. One Mandaiyan @ Siddhi Reddy executed Ex.A-1 on 14.5.1948...
M/s. Poppys Hotel Private Limited
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-03-2016
(Prayer: Petitions filed under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 read with Rules 9, 11(B) and 79 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, to sanction the scheme of arrangement (demerger). ) Common Order:...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free