Pool - Judgment Search Results

Poole Vs. Fleeger

Court: US Supreme Court

Poole v. Fleeger - 36 U.S. 185 (1837) U.S. Supreme Court Poole v. Fleeger, 36 U.S. 11 Pet. 185

Southern Pacific Co. Vs. Pool

Court: US Supreme Court

Southern Pacific Co. v. Pool - 160 U.S. 438 (1896) U.S. Supreme Court Southern Pacific Co. v. Pool, 160 U.S. 438 (1896) Southern

Navig8 Chemical Pools Inc vs.nu Tek India Limited

Court: Delhi

Judgment reserved on 05.12.2018 Judgment pronounced on 30.07.2019 + OMP(EFA)(COMM) No.2/2018 & I.A. Nos. 4269/2018,4270/2018, 14422/2018 NAVIG8 CHEMICAL POOLS INC ..... Decree Holder Through Mr. Arvind Nigam, Sr. Advocate with Mr. O.P. Gaggar, Mr. Mikhil Sharda, Mr.

Pool N Club Vs. Chief Secretary

Court: Karnataka

TO VARIOUS JUDGEMENT OF THE HONBLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA AND THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT. IN W.P.NO.19322/2021: BETWEEN: POOL N CLUB NO.15, BASEMENT, CUNNIGHAM ROAD, BENGALURU-560 052. REPRESENTED BY THE MEMBER MR HARIRAJ SHETTY. … PETITIONER (BY

M/S. Pools Brook and Ripples India Pvt. Ltd. vs the State Tax Officer ...

Court: Kerala

THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 19TH SRAVANA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 5891 OF 2020 PETITIONER/S: M/S. POOLS BROOK AND RIPPLES INDIA PVT. LTD. ROAD, MAVELIPURAM, KAKKANAD P.O., COCHIN-682 030, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRCETOR, K.P.SURESHKUMAR

Triveni Pool Intairdril Ltd. Vs. Oil and Natural Gas Commission

Court: Delhi

Reported in: I(1996)BC617; 62(1996)DLT613

i.e. by getting the foreign exchange from outside sources. On 6th December, 1989, the petitioner Vol. LXn Triveni Pool Intairdril v. Oil & Natural Gas 615 represented to the Government to allow import of all the 4

Stow Bardolph Gravel Co. Ltd. Vs. Poole (inspector of Taxes).

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1955]27ITR146(Cal)

EVERSHED, M.R. - The question raised in this appeal is whether the Stow Bardolph Gravel Co. Ltd., to whom I will hereafter refer as the taxpayers, were entitled to bring into their trading and profit and...

United States Vs. Whiting Pools, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc. - 462 U.S. 198 (1983) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc., 462 U.S. 198

Labor Board Vs. Pool Mfg. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Labor Board v. Pool Mfg. Co. - 339 U.S. 577 (1950) U.S. Supreme Court Labor Board v. Pool Mfg. Co., 339 U.S.

Sadhana Saha and anr. Vs. Commandant Provisioning, M.T. Pool and ors.

Court: Guwahati

50,000. Holding that the vehicle, which was responsible for the accident, was owned by the Commandant Provisioning, M.T. Pool, Agartala, the Tribunal directed him to pay the compensation amount.5. The sole question, which falls for consideration in