Court : Karnataka
Reported in : [2007]135CompCas157(Kar); 2007(1)AIRKarR632; AIR2007NOC426(DB).
..... forced to make a reference to the board of industrial and financial reconstruction (for short, 'bifr') under section 15 of the sick industrial undertakings (special provisions) act, 1985 ('the act' for short) during january 2000. bifr registered the said reference as case no. 49/2000. enquiry was ordered in the matter. ifci was appointed as ..... judgment. that was a case in which the court was considering with regard to deposits made in a nationalised bank. that case arose under the consumers protection act. the said judgment would not be applicable to the facts of this case. : [1993]1scr340 maharashtra tubes limited v. state industrial and investment corporation of ..... maharashtra and ors. refers to section 22 of the act. the apex court ruled that the expression 'proceedings' in section 22(1) must be widely construed; and that it cannot be confined to legal proceedings understood .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : [2008(116)FLR32]; 2007(6)KarLJ216; (2008)ILLJ329Kant
..... board for industrial & financial reconstruction established under section 4 of the sick industrial companies (special provisions) act, 1985 subject to such terms and conditions as may be specified in the scheme. 9. the object of the act as noted is to protect the interest of the employees and when such contribution is being made and ..... have paid the contribution regularly. meanwhile, the respondent authority is said to have initiated proceedings under section 14b of the employees provident fund & miscellaneous provisions act ('act' for short) having issued a show cause notice on 3.5.2002 proposing to levy damages for the delay in payment of contribution for the period from ..... to time taking into consideration the various suggestions and recommendations. the standing labour committee is said to have taken a decision for the enactment of the act as well as recommended for enhancement of the rate of provident fund contribution to protect the interest of the employees. it would be apt to extract .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : 2002(4)KarLJ213
..... submitted by the government of tamil naduand the institution did not have any recognition from the said government immediately before the coming into force of the act, was according to the southern regional committee sufficient to hold that the institution was not an existing institution as claimed by it. that conclusion of ..... required the petitioner to produce a no objection certificate from the state government as required by regulation 5(e) of the ncte regulations framed under the act aforementioned. by another communication dated 27th of january, 1999, the petitioner was once again informed that since it was not included in the list of ..... claims to be a linguistic minority educational institution established in the year 1985 at melakodumalur in ramanathapuram district of state of tamil nadu. it was, according to the petitioner, in existence as on the date the national council for teacher education act, 1993 came into force. an application seeking recognition of the ncte established .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : AIR1983Kant251
..... claim, the right of admission to their institutions on such criteria as are prescribed which are not contrary to the regulatory measures prescribed by the concerned university under the universities act, it cannot be said to be required to be granted by an executive order like the order impugned in these writ petitions.33. numerous other decisions ..... capitation fee with the commencement of the academic year 1982-83 itself, while the unaided colleges are permitted to collect the capitation fee till the academic year 1985-86 though at a rate which is gradually scaled down year after year.8. the impugned order also at the same time empowers the state government ..... conditions stipulated in rule 3 of karnataka engineering colleges and technological institute(section of candidates for admission)rules.5% at rs. 30,000/- per seat for others.1985-86 90% 10% nil the distribution of seats as above and the intake sanctioned are subject to following conditions.- (1) no capitation fee whatsoever shall be .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : AIR1991Kant352; ILR1991KAR387; 1991(1)KarLJ556
..... its receiving financial aid from the government. once we find that the activities of a private educational institutions is regulated by the provisions of the act and the universities act, the mere fact that the institution in not receiving financial aid, makes no difference for the issue of a writ under art. 226, ..... are not 'state' as defined in art. 12 of the constitution, they are discharging public duties, which are regulated by the act and the universities act, and particularly as the act prohibits the collection of capitation fee, the private colleges are required to admit students to the colleges strictly according to merit as that ..... students to the university. having all these powers under the universities act nobody is taking any action to stop the practice of taking 5-10 lakh rupees i.e. selling the medical and engineering collegeseats. the government has also powers to take action under the karnataka educational institutions prohibition of capitation fees act, 1985, under section .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR2008KAR2008; 2008(5)KarLJ187; 2008(2)KCCRSN106
..... petition on the ground that the dispute raised in the writ petition relates to service matter as defined under section 3(q) of the administrative tribunals act, 1985 and, therefore, the writ petitioner has got an alternative efficacious remedy of approaching the karnataka administrative tribunal against annexures-a and g. challenging the order ..... even though learned counsel for the appellant relied on rule 215 of the karnataka civil services rules and the decision of the hon'ble supreme court in gorakhpur university and ors. v. dr. shitla prasad nagendra and ors. : air2001sc2433 , to support his contention that the amount in question is not liable to be ..... in holding that the writ petitioner/appellant has got an alternative efficacious remedy of approaching the karnataka administrative tribunal under section 15 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985. the view taken by the learned single judge is correct in the light of the observations contained in paragraph 99 of the judgment of the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1985KAR1202; 1985(2)KarLJ1
..... point out later, that the necessity or otherwise of new medical colleges is a matter for consideration by the concerned university and the government under sections 53 (2)(a) and (5) of the karnataka state universities act, 1976 ('the act' for short) and it would be open for the association to represent its view before them, no direction can ..... for consideration by the state government. in support of his submission, learned counsel relied on the ordinance framed under the karnatak university act, 1949 which according to the learned counsel is in force, under the 1976 act, as no new ordinance has been framed on the topic, a copy of the same was produced at the time of ..... relates to a college which is intended to have a course of study leading to a degree or diploma of any of the universities under the act, the securing of affiliation under section 53 the of act, is a condition precedent. though a person might, in exercise of his fundamental right either under article 30 and or articles 19 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1991KAR1928; 1992(1)KarLJ1
..... licence - (1) every applicant who has been granted a licence under section 7, whether before or after the commencement of the karnataka money lenders (amendment) act, 1985 shall within thirty days from the date of such commencement, and thereafter before the last day of october of every year pay security deposit as provided in sub ..... test to be applied for the purpose of determining whether the restrictions imposed by the impugned law are reasonable or not cannot be cast in a rigid formula of universal application, for, as pointed out by patanjali shastri, j. in state of madras v. v.j. row, : 1952crilj966 no abstract standard or general pattern ..... securing licence. in view of the incorporation of section 7a and 7b into the money lenders act by the karnataka money lenders (amendment) act, 1985 and the incorporation of sections 4a and 4b into the karnataka pawn brokers (amendment) act, 1985, the petitioners are challenging the constitutional validity of the said provisions on the ground they are .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : [1993]77CompCas402(Kar)
..... of the societies. the argument of learned counsel is an attempt at hair-splitting and is rejected.' 29. the decision in daman singh's case, : [1985]3scr580 , literally takes away all sting from the petitioners' challenge. the in limine objection raised by the advocate-general turning them literally into damp squibs. ..... apex society. hence, i pass the following order : order in exercise of the powers vested in me under section 14a of the karnataka co-operative societies act, 1959, i, lewis (l. r.), additional registrar of co-operative societies, (industrial and miscellaneous) bangalore, hereby order the amalgamation of the karnataka state ..... society should be reorganised, then, the registrar shall order the amalgamation, division or reorganisation of such co-operative societies.' 4. i may also mention section 15 of the act with particular reference to sub-clause (2) thereof which reads : '15. cancellation of registration certificates of co-operative societies in certain cases. - . . . (2 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : 2006(3)KarLJ24
..... any other use even when it is transferred to another party. the rationale of this restriction is that the scheme once sanctioned by the government must operate universally and the areas allocated for particular objects must not be diverted to other objects. this means that a site for a school or hospital or any other ..... the action of the board and state government is in blatant violation of article 14 of the constitution of india, the provisions of kt and cp act, kiadb act and regulations.25. the further submissions made by the learned senior counsel and government pleader that by acquiring lands in favour of private limited company employment ..... or impels the action mala fides or fraud on power vitiates the acquisition or other official act.the above decision is reiterated by the apex court in the subsequent case the collector (district magistrate), allahabad and anr. v. raja ram jaiswal : [1985]3scr995 . the learned senior counsel mr. s. vijayashankar has rightly placed reliance upon the .....
Tag this Judgment!