Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pondicherry university act 1985 section 14 directors Court: karnataka Page 3 of about 3,294 results (0.181 seconds)

Dec 07 2011 (HC)

Jayantha and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2012(1)KarLJ258; 2012(1)KantLJ258

..... regarding implementation of the order passed by this court in the writ appeals at its level keeping in view the rules of the government in vogue and the universities act. the syndicates thus examined the matters at its meetings and had resolved that the services of 17 non-teachings employees who had worked for more than 10 years ..... has vehemently resisted the petition and would contend that the petitioners were employed temporarily by the second respondent invoking section 51-b of the karnataka state universities act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the act' for brevity)' in which, the period prescribed for appointment in less than one year. however, they were continued from time to time. ..... in terms of the statutes framed by the second respondent, which were duly assented to by the vice-chancellor of the univ ersity as early as 1-6-1985. the initial appointment of the petitioners was certainly in conformity with the law laid down by the apex court. secondly, it is pointed out that this .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 15 2004 (HC)

A.H. Mahalakshmi Vs. Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2004KAR4938; 2005(1)KarLJ88

..... the vishveshwaraiah university of technical education act, 1994 (karnataka act 39 of 1994), as the case may be. (3) all admissions made to and by the colleges shall ..... officer, the concerned university, to which the college is affiliated, shall enforce the admission order issued under these rules, failing which, the concerned university shall take such action as it deems fit against the institution concerned by exercising the powers vested in it under karnataka state universities act, 2000, (karnataka act 29 of 2001), rajiv gandhi university of health sciences act, 1994 (karnataka act 44 of 1994) and .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 24 2005 (HC)

Dakshyanamma Vs. B. Siddalingaiah

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : I(2006)DMC332; ILR2005KAR3234; 2005(6)KarLJ229

..... justified in holding that section 14(2) of hindu succession act applies to the case on hand and not section 14(1) of hindu succession act?2. whether the first appellate court had not properly constructed the purport of the karar dated 9.1.1985, while recording a finding against the appellant?3. whether in ..... the facts and circumstances of the case the first appellate court was justified in reversing the judgment and decree of the trial court?4. heard the counsel representing the appellant and the respondent.5. learned counsel for the appellant having taken me through the relevant provisions under the hindu succession act ..... a coparcener and she has a limited right of enjoyment during her lifetime without the right of alienation as is specifically provided under the married women's property act, 1933 (mysore). further, it is also made clear in the judgment of the apex court in the decision in vaddeboyina tulasamma and ors. v. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 22 1997 (HC)

Smt. G.K. Sowbhagya and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Another

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1999KAR804; 1998(1)KarLJ612

..... should be declared as ultra vires and null and void. in order to appreciate the contention of the learned counsel, it will be useful to extract section 36 of the universities act. the same reads as under: '36. the statutes -- their making:-- (1) the statutes may be made, amended or repealed by the senate in the manner hereinafter provided. (2) the senate ..... shall retire at the age of 60 and all the non-teaching employees of the university shall retire at the age of 55. as per the approval of the governor in government order no. ed 21 uks 82, dated 13-8-1985, in relation to amended statute concerning retirement age, the age of retirement of teachers is 60 and the age of ..... retire at the age of 55 years'.6. there was an amendment to the aforesaid statute in the year 1985 and by this amendment, teachers in the university were eligible to serve upto the age of 60 years and thenon-teaching employees were asked to retire at the age of 58years. 7. by a notification no. ka: v: .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 23 2005 (HC)

Sri Belimatha Mahasamsthana Institute of Technology Vs. Visveswaraiah ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2005(4)KarLJ623

..... and allied sciences. the purpose of the act is to ensure proper and systematic instruction, teaching, training and research ..... 2004, annexure-o passed by the university after inspection and after accepting the report in the matter of disaffiliation of the college and transfer of students to other affiliated colleges of the university.13. visveswaraiah technological university act, 1994 (for short, 'the act'), is an act established for the development of engineering technology ..... in section 20. sub-clause (w) reads as under:'to be in-charge of the academic affairs of the university and subject to the provisions of this act and the statutes exercise general power of superintendence direction and control and be responsible for the maintenance of academic standards of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 18 2006 (HC)

Employees State Insurance Corporation Rep. by Its Deputy Director Vs. ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [2008(119)FLR1003; 2008(6)KLJ266; 2008(1)AIRKarR544; 2008CriLjNOC323; 2008LabIC(NOC)344(Kar)

..... appellant relied upon a decision of the supreme court reported in case of sheoratan agarwal and anr. v. state of madhya pradesh : [1985]1scr719 wherein, it has been held thus:essential commodities act (10 off 1955), sections 3, 10-offences by companies - separate prosecution of person-in-charge or officer of company without prosecuting ..... case of regional provident fund commissioner v. sardari lal criminal appeal no. 4/1980 wherein, it has been held as under:employees' provident funds and miscellaneous provisions act, 1952 - section 14-ac-code of criminal procedure, 1973 - section 378(4) - present application appeal against acquittal not having been filed by complainant, i. ..... e., inspector appointed under section 13 of the act, is not maintainable.14. having heard the arguments of the learned counsel appearing on both sides, now i proceed to see whether the finding recorded by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 24 1999 (HC)

Medical Council of India, New Delhi Vs. J.N. Medical College, Belgaum ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1999KAR1961; 1999(5)KarLJ1

..... had been established prior to 1-6-1992 will lie exclusively with the state government, keeping in view the provisions of section 4 of state capitation fee act and section 53(10) of the state universities act. but i find myself unable to agree with the said proposition. i have no hesitation in holding that after incorporation of section 10-a in the ..... of new institutions or increase the number of seats or to start new courses. 14. in the present case, respondent 1-college's seats were increased up to 130 in 1985 with the approval of mci. thereafter, when they increased the seats from time to time up to 195 by 1992 admittedly there is no approval of the mci and the ..... filed by respondent 1-college with certain directions.2. the brief facts of the case are that respondent 1-college was started in the year 1963-64. in the year 1985-86 the college had increased the seats up to 130 and the same was approved by the mci. thereafterwards, up to 1-6-1992 the seats in the college were .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 17 2006 (HC)

Shri Pundalika Savanna Kaladagi S/O Savanna Kaladagi Vs. the State of ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [2007(112)FLR649]

..... alleged violation of the petitioner's service conditions, the petitioner's remedy lies before the karnataka administrative tribunal in terms of section 15 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985. he would submit that this is a threshold bar to the petition.9. without prejudice to the above he would further submit that the second respondent ..... a writ petition before this court, a single judge had held that the petition was not maintainable in view of section 15(1) of the administrative tribunals act, 1985. this was challenged in appeal. in the appeal the division bench while affirming the order, held that government servant holding a civil post under the government ..... can be said that the petitioner continues to be a government servant, and in the result, would necessarily have to approach the tribunal under the administrative tribunals act, 1985 in respect of his grievance, if any, as is sought to be urged in the present petition. having answered the first question in the affirmative, it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 1986 (HC)

Associated Mechanical Industries Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [1986]61STC225(Kar)

..... supreme court in k. p. varghese v. income-tax officer, ernakulam : [1981]131itr597(sc) reiterated in commissioner of income-tax, bangalore v. gotla ilr (1985) kar 3749 (sc) we are of the view that notwithstanding the omission of those terms, steel tubes include gi pipes and the latter cannot be excluded from ..... or 'galvanize' from which the former is derived. 13. the words 'galvanization' and 'galvanize' are defined in the following general dictionaries as hereunder : ''galvanization' - the act or process of galvanizing; the application of an electric current to the human body for medical purposes. 'galvanize' - 1a. to subject to the action of an electric current ..... not goods falling under entry 2(a)(xi) of the fourth schedule and that they are unclassified goods taxable under section 5(1) of the karnataka sales tax act, 1957 .........' on this conclusion, the commissioner directed the acct as hereunder : 'the assessment order dated 26th november, 1980, passed by the assistant commissioner of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 09 1958 (HC)

Subrao Vs. Bhupal Dasharath Katte and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1959Kant129; AIR1959Mys129; ILR1958KAR677; (1958)36MysLJ898

..... transit, the incidental duty was reduced. one of the objections raised was that the municipal court had no jurisdiction to entertain the suit. it is a rule of universal law that a sovereign is not liable to be sued in his own courts without his consent. that is in fact an acknowledged attribute of sovereignty. in that ..... to ordinary notions, be deemed to have exercised his legislative authority. when again he affirmed or reversed a judicial decision, that may appropriately be described as a judicial act. a rigid line of demarcation, however, between the one and the other would from the very nature of things be not justified or even possible.' in view of ..... uncontrolled sovereign powers. he was the supreme legislature, the supreme judiciary and the supreme head of the executive and there were no constitutional limitations upon his authority to act in any of these capacities. the 'firmans' were expressions of the sovereign will of the nizam and they were binding in the same way as any other law .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //