Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pondicherry university act 1985 section 14 directors Court: karnataka Page 1 of about 3,294 results (0.317 seconds)

Smt. Eugenia Preethi Vs. Sri. Leo John

Court : Karnataka

..... of 25th january 1879). ten communes were created by the decree of 12th march 1880. the establishment of pondicherry numbered four of them and that of karaikal three. the municipal councils were elected by universal franchise. however, as for the elections to the general council, the electors were registered on two lists, ..... repealed by a competent legislature. 16th day of august, 1962 was made as the appointed date.32. under section 4(2) of the pondicherry (administration) act, the central government was empowered by order to make such adoptions and modifications, for the purpose of facilitating the application of any law in relation ..... villianoor road, reddiarpalayam, puducherry 605 010. ... respondent (by sri nandish patil, advocate) * * * these miscellaneous first appeals are filed under section39of the special marriage act, 1954, against the judgment and decree dated57-2018 passed in m.c. no.3116 of2011on the file of the iv additional principal judge, family court, bengaluru, dismissing .....

Leo John Vs. Smt. Eugenia Preethi

Court : Karnataka

..... of 25th january 1879). ten communes were created by the decree of 12th march 1880. the establishment of pondicherry numbered four of them and that of karaikal three. the municipal councils were elected by universal franchise. however, as for the elections to the general council, the electors were registered on two lists, ..... repealed by a competent legislature. 16th day of august, 1962 was made as the appointed date.32. under section 4(2) of the pondicherry (administration) act, the central government was empowered by order to make such adoptions and modifications, for the purpose of facilitating the application of any law in relation ..... villianoor road, reddiarpalayam, puducherry 605 010. ... respondent (by sri nandish patil, advocate) * * * these miscellaneous first appeals are filed under section39of the special marriage act, 1954, against the judgment and decree dated57-2018 passed in m.c. no.3116 of2011on the file of the iv additional principal judge, family court, bengaluru, dismissing .....

Sachidananda K. and ors. Vs. Bangalore University and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2006KAR1387; 2006(2)KarLJ216

..... of lecturer, in that, the 1st petitioner has passed net (national eligibility test for lectureship) and the 2nd petitioner has submitted a thesis to the pondicherry university for award of ph. d and the 3rd petitioner has passed ll.m. and belongs to scheduled tribe. their grievance is that the respondent ..... inviting applications is issued on 18-5-2005.4. it is further contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the university ought to have followed the provisions contained under section 53 of the karnataka state universities act for making the selection and the appointments. he has relied on sub-sections (4), (6), (7) and (8) ..... the requisite qualification namely national eligibility test for lectureship and that the appointment made is strictly in compliance with the provisions of section 55 of the karnataka state universities act.7. during the course of arguments it is brought to the notice of the court that some of the lecturers do possess net qualification. counsel for .....

Lolaksha, S/O Late K. Ranga Represented as Guardian to Daughter, Preet ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2009KAR3934; 2009(4)KCCRSN240.

..... to the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes candidates of karnataka state is mandated by the provisions made under the karnataka state universities act and other similar provisions applicable to vishweshwariah technological university and hence it is the duty of the institutions to make reservations as per the state government orders, but, such ..... government orders clearly providing that migrant scheduled caste persons were eligible for appointment on posts reserved for scheduled caste persons in the union territory of pondicherry and in the absence of any statutory enactment or rules made in exercise of powers conferred under the proviso to article 309 of the constitution ..... control of and are under an obligation to comply with any particular direction issued by the president. further, the administrator (lt governor of pondicherry) while acting under the scope of the authority given to him under article 239 of the constitution would be the central government.15. the central government .....

Dr. H.S. Appaji Vs. Bangalore University

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1988KAR2385; 1988(3)KarLJ200

..... the revised examinations. in the circumstances, they should not be permitted to raise any legal contention based on the provisions of the universities act. even otherwise no provision of the universities act is brought to my notice wherein the students have got a vested right to take a particular examination notwithstanding the same was cancelled ..... .'12. as noticed earlier, in the circumstances in which the chairman was placed due to non availability of the two external examiners from bombay and pondicherry, he had no other option but to postpone the examinations and obtain confirmation from these examiners whether they were prepared to assist the board for holding ..... u. wagholikar, professor and head of the department of pathology, grant medical college, bombay and 2) dr. a.j. velliath, professor of pathology, jipmer, pondicherry. that these persons had accepted the assignment offered to them is clear from the annexed list to the aforesaid letter. the chairman had no grievance when he was .....

Pranav Bajpe Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... , 15% of the seats have been reserved for all-india quota, which are for colleges, which come under deemed universities, central universities, esi colleges, aims and jipmer university, pondicherry. (vi) as noted above, it was subsequently with effect from 06/04/2017 that the 2006 act was amended by the state government to redefine non-resident indian to include pio cardholders as well as oci ..... effective as if they have been done or taken by the state government in accordance with this act. 4b. method of admission in deemed university institutions.- (1) in case deemed university institution fails to follow ugc regulations in making admission to professional education courses, the deemed university institutions shall constitute an association for conduct of common entrance test for admission to their seats and .....

The State Of Karnataka Vs. Pranav V Deshpande

Court : Karnataka

..... , 15% of the seats have been reserved for all-india quota, which are for colleges, which come under deemed universities, central universities, esi colleges, aims and jipmer university, pondicherry. (vi) as noted above, it was subsequently with effect from 06/04/2017 that the 2006 act was amended by the state government to redefine non-resident indian to include pio cardholders as well as oci ..... effective as if they have been done or taken by the state government in accordance with this act. 4b. method of admission in deemed university institutions.- (1) in case deemed university institution fails to follow ugc regulations in making admission to professional education courses, the deemed university institutions shall constitute an association for conduct of common entrance test for admission to their seats and .....

Sudhakar Hegde and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

..... benches have not taken into consideration the impact of the judgment of the constitution bench of this court in b. shama rao v. union territory of pondicherry [(1967) 2 scr 650], a pertinent constitutional aspect that ought to have been brought to the notice of different benches was that the federal structure of ..... come into force which controlled governance of the country and therefore the principles, inter alia, stated by the privy council could riot be adopted as law of universal application without appropriately modifying the stated position of law to bring it in complete harmony with the constitutional mandate. 7. in gauri shankar gaur v. state ..... one in secretary of state vs. hindustan coop. society ltd. [air 1931 pc 148]. there the provisions of the calcutta improvement act, 1911 (act 13/1911) fell for consideration. that act coupled with its schedule contained provisions not only for issuing relevant notification in regard to acquisition but also for reference to a tribunal for .....

R. Shankaran and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

..... benches have not taken into consideration the impact of the judgment of the constitution bench of this court in b. shama rao v. union territory of pondicherry [(1967) 2 scr 650]. a pertinent constitutional aspect that ought to have been brought to the notice of different benches was that the federal structure of ..... come into force which controlled governance of the country and therefore the principles, inter alia, stated by the privy council could not be adopted as law of universal application without appropriately modifying the slated position of law to bring it in complete harmony with the constitutional mandate. 7. in gauri shankar gaur v. state ..... one in secretary of state vs. hindustan coop. society ltd. [air 1931 pc 148]. there the provisions of the calcutta improvement act, 1911 (act-13/1911) fell for consideration. that act coupled with its schedule contained provisions not only for issuing relevant notification in regard to acquisition but also for reference to a tribunal for .....

Sri R Shankaran Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... benches have not taken into consideration the impact of the judgment of the constitution bench of this court in b. shama rao v. union territory of pondicherry [(1967) 2 scr650. a pertinent constitutional aspect that ought to have been brought to the notice of different benches was that the federal structure of the ..... force which controlled governance of the country and 297 therefore the principles, inter alia, stated by the privy council could not be adopted as law of universal application without appropriately modifying the stated position of law to bring it in complete harmony with the constitutional mandate.7. in gauri shankar gaur v. state ..... council is the one in secretary of state vs. hindustan coop. society ltd. [air1931pc148. there the provisions of the calcutta improvement act, 1911 (act 13/1911) fell for consideration. that act coupled with its schedule contained provisions not only for issuing relevant notification in regard to acquisition but also for reference to a tribunal for .....