Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pondicherry extension of laws act 1968 section 5 extension of rules orders etc under certain laws Sorted by: recent Page 1 of about 387 results (0.836 seconds)

Venkataraman @ Murali @ Raja, Vs. R. Venugopal and R. Ganesan @ Vinaya ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2008)2MLJ348

..... unless and until superseded by anything done or any action taken under the said act.12. section 3 of the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968 provides extension with amendment of certain laws to pondicherry and the different dates which may be appointed for different provisions of any act and any reference in any such ..... lower court also committed an error that the respondents acquired the right within the meaning of sub-section 2 of section 4 of the pondicherry extension of laws act, 1963.7. the further case of the civil revision petitioners/respondents is that the lower court has overlooked the fact that the ..... mad 32 adaikappa chettiar v. a. natchiar wherein it is observed as follows:(b) pondicherry (extension of laws) act (1969) section 4 - mortgage executed before notaire executable under the french law without recourse to suit - indian enactments extended to pondicherry by the pondicherry (extension of laws) act 1968 section 4(1), (2) - subsequent suit on the mortgage in indian .....

High Court Bar Association Allahabad Vs. The State Of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... v. amalendu das, (1984) 2 scc436 para 4 :1984. scc (tax) 133; cce v. dunlop india ltd., (1985) 1 scc260 para 5 :1985. scc (tax) 75; state (ut of pondicherry) v. p.v. suresh, (1994) 2 scc70 para 15 and state of w.b. v. calcutta hardware stores, (1986) 2 scc203 para 5].31. wherever stay is granted, a speaking ..... a date not beyond six months of the order of stay so that on expiry of period of stay, proceedings can commence unless order of extension of stay is produced.37. thus, we declare the law to be that order framing charge is not purely an interlocutory order nor a final order. jurisdiction of the high court is not barred irrespective ..... mandatory time-limit may be fixed, the decision may not exceed two-three months normally. if it remains pending longer, duration of stay should not exceed six months, unless extension is granted by a specific speaking order, as already indicated. mandate of speedy justice applies to the pc act cases as well as other cases where at trial stage proceedings .....

Government Of Nct Of Delhi Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... chief secretary has emanated from the gnctd while the appointment is actually made by the union government. hence, the proposed extension which is sought to be granted to the chief secretary is without the authority of law.11. in response to the plea which has been made by the petitioner, an affidavit has been filed by ..... territories; (ii) nct of delhi, andaman and nicobar islands, lakshdweep, daman and diu and dadra and nagar haveli civil and police services (danics and danips); (iii) pondicherry civil and police services.12. the submissions which were urged by the solicitor general have been supplemented by mr sanjay jain, senior counsel. mr. jain submitted that: a. ..... and the executive powers of the gnctd. in relation to chief secretaries who are appointed to the states, rule 16 of the 1958 rules contemplates that an extension can be granted with the prior approval of the state government on the recommendation by the state government with a full justification and in public interest . this .....

Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... that the reference to state in articles 54 and 55 would include 13 air1970sc209741 part f the national capital territory of delhi and the union territory of pondicherry for constituting the electoral college for the election of the president. in shiv kirpal singh (supra), this court did not refer to the decision in advance ..... the majority decision in the 2018 constitution bench judgement rendered a broad interpretation of article 239aa(3)(a) to provide nctd with vast executive and co-extensive legislative powers except in the excluded subjects. a combined reading of the majority opinion and the concurring opinions of justice chandrachud and justice bhushan indicates ..... president would not preclude parliament from enacting legislation in future to override or modify the law enacted by the legislative assembly 20 part c19 the 2018 constitution bench judgment held that the executive power of nctd is co-extensive with its legislative power, that is, it shall extend to all matters with respect .....

Sri Tamarai Kannan Vs. State At The Instance Of Assistant

Court : Karnataka

..... public.24. though the learned counsel for the petitioner also contended that the petitioner-accused no.1 was licensed drug manufacturer and license was renewed by the pondicherry government, but the pondicherry government was issued license for manufacture of drugs, 33 but the central government is empowered under the d.c. act for issuing any notifications and section 16 ..... of cr.p.c. and along with the complaint, they have filed an application under section 473 of cr.p.c. for condoning the delay and also for extension of the time 21 for taking cognizance as per section 468 of cr.p.c. the learned magistrate in all three cases has passed a considerable order and ..... section 26 of the d.c. act. therefore, on that ground, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeking for quashing the criminal proceedings as abuse of process of law. in support of his contention, the learned counsel has relied upon the following judgments of the hon ble supreme court as well as various judgments of other high .....

Sri Tamarai Kannan Vs. State At The Instance Of Assistant Of Drugs

Court : Karnataka

..... public.24. though the learned counsel for the petitioner also contended that the petitioner-accused no.1 was licensed drug manufacturer and license was renewed by the pondicherry government, but the pondicherry government was issued license for manufacture of drugs, 33 but the central government is empowered under the d.c. act for issuing any notifications and section 16 ..... of cr.p.c. and along with the complaint, they have filed an application under section 473 of cr.p.c. for condoning the delay and also for extension of the time 21 for taking cognizance as per section 468 of cr.p.c. the learned magistrate in all three cases has passed a considerable order and ..... section 26 of the d.c. act. therefore, on that ground, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeking for quashing the criminal proceedings as abuse of process of law. in support of his contention, the learned counsel has relied upon the following judgments of the hon ble supreme court as well as various judgments of other high .....

Smt. Eugenia Preethi Vs. Sri. Leo John

Court : Karnataka

..... would not have any application.35. in the year 1968, a second exercise of a similar nature was undertaken by the parliament and an act known as the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968 was passed. under section 3(1) of the said act, the parliament extended the provisions of the acts specified in parts i and ii ..... , whether the provisions of the hindu succession act was applicable to them, the madras high court considering the fact that, parliament had enacted the pondicherry (laws) regulation, 1963, and the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968. it is only when there is specific mention in the schedule that the provisions of hindu succession act or any other personal ..... this did not make any difference with regard to the applicability of french civil code to renouncants. (j) subsequently, in the year 1968, the parliament enacted pondicherry (extension of laws) 1968 in which the provisions of certain act specified in parts i and ii of schedule were extended to the union territory of .....

Leo John Vs. Smt. Eugenia Preethi

Court : Karnataka

..... would not have any application.35. in the year 1968, a second exercise of a similar nature was undertaken by the parliament and an act known as the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968 was passed. under section 3(1) of the said act, the parliament extended the provisions of the acts specified in parts i and ii ..... , whether the provisions of the hindu succession act was applicable to them, the madras high court considering the fact that, parliament had enacted the pondicherry (laws) regulation, 1963, and the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968. it is only when there is specific mention in the schedule that the provisions of hindu succession act or any other personal ..... this did not make any difference with regard to the applicability of french civil code to renouncants. (j) subsequently, in the year 1968, the parliament enacted pondicherry (extension of laws) 1968 in which the provisions of certain act specified in parts i and ii of schedule were extended to the union territory of .....

Rojer Mathew Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd and Ors Chief Manager

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... were proceedings in parliament and could hence not be called in question before this court in view of article 122(1).74. both sides have extensively relied upon case law and constitutional history to substantiate their respective pleas. relevant portions of the same are being referred to in the latter parts of this judgment whenever necessary ..... , the majority view, as clarified and held by j.m. shelat, j.speaking for the majority in b. shama rao v. union territory of pondicherry,31 can be deduced as under: in view of the intense divergence of opinion except for their conclusion partially to uphold the validity of the said ..... ensure their reappointment. the court noted that since the ntt had been vested with jurisdiction that earlier vested in the high courts, all matters of appointment and extension of tenure must be shielded from the executive. the court noted that upon the declaration of numerous provisions as unconstitutional, the remaining provisions were rendered otiose and worthless .....

Fiberfill Engineers vs.indian Oil Corporation Limited

Court : Delhi

..... a bid for designing, supplying, installation, testing and commissioning of high mast signage systems of various heights and types at retail outlets in the state of tamil nadu and pondicherry. 7.1 the tenure of the contract was one year, that is, till 10.1.2008. 7.2 the engagement of ffe was on the rate contract basis ..... . the tenure of the contract was extendable, albeit, with mutual consent by a further period of one year. the provision for extension is made in clause 8 of the special instructions to tenderers/contractor ( sit ). 7.3 the petitioner was required to install 105 signages pursuant to call-up orders ..... arbitration is situated in india (a) in an arbitration other international commercial arbitration, the arbitral tribunal shall decide the dispute submitted to arbitration in accordance with the substantive law for the time being in force in india; than an (emphasis is mine) 20. before i conclude, i must briefly touch upon the judgments cited by ms. .....