Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pondicherry extension of laws act 1968 section 5 extension of rules orders etc under certain laws Sorted by: recent Court: chennai Page 1 of about 29 results (0.181 seconds)

Dec 14 2007 (HC)

Venkataraman @ Murali @ Raja, Vs. R. Venugopal and R. Ganesan @ Vinaya ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2008)2MLJ348

..... unless and until superseded by anything done or any action taken under the said act.12. section 3 of the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968 provides extension with amendment of certain laws to pondicherry and the different dates which may be appointed for different provisions of any act and any reference in any such ..... lower court also committed an error that the respondents acquired the right within the meaning of sub-section 2 of section 4 of the pondicherry extension of laws act, 1963.7. the further case of the civil revision petitioners/respondents is that the lower court has overlooked the fact that the ..... mad 32 adaikappa chettiar v. a. natchiar wherein it is observed as follows:(b) pondicherry (extension of laws) act (1969) section 4 - mortgage executed before notaire executable under the french law without recourse to suit - indian enactments extended to pondicherry by the pondicherry (extension of laws) act 1968 section 4(1), (2) - subsequent suit on the mortgage in indian .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 22 2016 (HC)

T.K.S. Elangovan and Others Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Ch ...

Court : Chennai

..... and consistency are core of judicial discipline. but that which escapes in the judgment without any occasion is not ratio decidendi. in shama rao v. state of pondicherry air 1967 sc 1680 it was observed, 'it is trite to say that a decision is binding not because of its conclusions but in regard to its ..... observed that compulsory retirement must be given to those judicial officers who are unfit and of doubtful integrity, reputation and utility. the benefit is to be given for extension not automatically, but to judicial officers, who, in the opinion of the respective high courts, have a potential for continued useful service. thus, it was not ..... years. d) mr.s.muthuraj/sixth respondent has practiced as an advocate in high court of madras and subordinate courts in matters relating to service law, administrative law and labour law and in addition to that he was legal advisor/standing counsel for tamil nadu state marketing corporation and tamil nadu warehousing corporation in the high court. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 2016 (HC)

Candida Justina Vs. Sunderbabu

Court : Chennai

..... code civil, for dissolution of the marriage. though french code was applicable initially at the time of independence, now pursuant to the enactment of the pondicherry (extension of laws) act 1968 (no.26 of 1968), specified in part i of the schedule and part ii of the schedule has been extended to ..... misquoting the provisions in the petition, does not preclude the parties from getting the relief, as per law applicable to them. therefore, the contention of the learned counsel for the appellant that ..... pondicherry, subject to the modification, if any specified in the schedule. the indian christian marriage act, 1872 is also found extended to pondicherry. therefore, the divorce act, 1869 is applicable to the parties. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 20 2016 (HC)

The Government of Puducherry Rep. by its Joint Secretary, Department o ...

Court : Chennai

..... of the total quantity of each variety of paddy or rice so transported and shall also obtain separate permit in this behalf from the director of civil supplies, pondicherry in pondicherry region and the regional executive officer, karaikal in karaikal region, as the case may be. " 7. pursuant to the communication from the government of india, ..... .06.2010, notifying the amendment to clause 4 of levy order increasing from "ten percent" to "fifty percent". the request of the government of puducherry for extension of delivery of single boiled levy rice for kms 2009-10 for two months beyond 30th september 2010 and the rates, as per the enclosed provisional cost sheet ..... without reasons. in the g.o, revoking the incentive, public interest is shown as predominant reason. we do not see any arbitrariness or violation of rule of law in revoking the incentive. 22. learned counsel appearing for the respondents pointed out that in the impugned order, it is mentioned that incentive to the millers under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 20 2016 (HC)

The Government of Puducherry Rep. by its Joint Secretary, Department o ...

Court : Chennai

..... of the total quantity of each variety of paddy or rice so transported and shall also obtain separate permit in this behalf from the director of civil supplies, pondicherry in pondicherry region and the regional executive officer, karaikal in karaikal region, as the case may be. " 7. pursuant to the communication from the government of india, ..... .06.2010, notifying the amendment to clause 4 of levy order increasing from "ten percent" to "fifty percent". the request of the government of puducherry for extension of delivery of single boiled levy rice for kms 2009-10 for two months beyond 30th september 2010 and the rates, as per the enclosed provisional cost sheet ..... without reasons. in the g.o, revoking the incentive, public interest is shown as predominant reason. we do not see any arbitrariness or violation of rule of law in revoking the incentive. 22. learned counsel appearing for the respondents pointed out that in the impugned order, it is mentioned that incentive to the millers under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 19 2016 (HC)

Mohamed Sultan Maraicar Vs. The Special Secretary, Government of Puduc ...

Court : Chennai

..... sought to be acquired. but, the vendor did not furnish further details. even as per the version of learned counsel appearing for government of pondicherry, when the notification under section 4(1) was issued, the authorities have verified the details of the owners of the subject lands sought to ..... the petitioner, under document no.1139/2009 dated 08.09.2009. 12. during the hearing of the writ petition, mrs.mala, learned counsel for pondicherry was directed to get clarifications, as to how, 4(1) notification, dated 05.10.2010, has been issued in the name of the erstwhile ..... collector (revenue), office of the deputy collector, karaikal - 609 602 sir, sub: land acquisition. ref: 113-182/3 13/2 rayat nanchai extension order 11, rule 34c a. herewith enclosed please find for your king perusal the photocopy of my previous letter dated 14.10.2011 as well as ..... as the schedule mentioned property, is concerned. it is open to the respondents to initiate proceedings in accordance with law. w.p. allowed. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 21 2016 (HC)

ADV R. Mahalakshmi Vs. Commissioner of Police, Egmore and Others

Court : Chennai

..... suspension from directorate of vigilance andanti corruption,shri shankar created a website in the name of www.savukku.net with the help of shri murugaiyan of pondicherry, by making payment to the website registrar google*enom on 24.11.2009. shri shankar used to write articles regarding corruption activities in tamil nadu ..... will there is a way'. the national cyber safety and security standards has filed a report before this court and therein informed that they had done extensive study on the setup and domain registration process in internet and the accessibility of data in social media. they submitted as follows: 1. there are ..... posted under the head "for being mentioned" as and when occasion requires. registry is directed to communicate this order to the group co-ordinator (joint secretary), cyber law division, department of information technology, ministry of communication and information technology, govt. of india, electronic niketan no.6 central govt. offices complex, new delhi - 110 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 03 2016 (HC)

M/s. Neycer India Limited Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Chennai

..... . considering the limited prayer sought for, mr.a.p.srinivas, learned senior standing counsel for customs, was put on notice on behalf of the commissioner of central excise, pondicherry, the sole respondent in all the appeals. 8. going through the material on record, mr.a.p.srinivas, learned senior standing counsel for the respondent submitted that the ..... ,00,000/- lakhs within a period of six weeks. the ld. advocate on behalf of the appellants submits that they have neither complied the stay order nor seeking extension of stay. since the appellants failed to comply with the stay order all the appeals are dismissed for non-compliance of the stay order. 11. though the tribunal ..... relevant factor for exercising powers under section 35-f of the central excise act, 1944. 5. on the above, the appellant has raised the following substantial questions of law:- 1. whether the order of the tribunal directing a pre-deposit of rs.3,00,000/- of the disputed taxes stands vitiated in as much as it fails .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2016 (HC)

M. Kadirvelu and Others Vs. G. Santhanalakshmi and Others

Court : Chennai

..... act would not have any application. 35. in the year 1968, a second exercise of a similar nature was undertaken by the parliament and an act known as the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968 was passed. under section 3(1) of the said act, the parliament extended the provisions of the acts specified in parts i and ii of ..... legal heir of her parents. 16. on issue no.4, the trial court took note of section 4 of the hindu succession act and the provisions of the pondicherry (extension of laws) regulation, 1963 and came to the conclusion that the plaintiff's father was entitled to 1/3rd of the half share of venugopal pillai and that therefore, the ..... fees. the trial court also recorded a finding that since the plaintiff was the daughter of appasamy (a) tandapany pillai, who died long after the extension of the hindu succession act to pondicherry, the plaintiff was prima facie a class i heir under the hindu succession act and that therefore, she is entitled to claim joint possession in terms .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 29 2016 (HC)

Arul @ Arul jothi and Another Vs. State by Inspector of Police Nelliku ...

Court : Chennai

..... joshima janardhanan has spoken about the treatment given to the deceased between 29.10.2008 to 03.11.2008 and p.w.3-sumathi at the pims hospital, pondicherry. p.w.16-dr.senthil kumar has spoken about the treatment given to the injured at the government hospital at cuddalore district. p.w.17-dr.syed ali ..... honda motorcycle and other properties worth around rs.15,000/-. in the same occurrence, all the 17 accused went to the house of p.w.9-sowndhararajan and caused extensive damage to the grinder, fan, wall clock, tubelight, almairah glass and house hold utensils, worth around rs.15,000/-. after the above occurrence, all the accused ..... consultation. it is, therefore, essential that the delay in the lodging of the first information report should be satisfactorialy explained. in the present case kopia daughter-in-law of madhandi deceased according to the prosecution case, was present when the accused made murderous assault on the deceased. valanjiaraju, step-son of the deceasedm is also alleged .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //