Court : Supreme Court of India
..... crlj (cal) 334; paramasivan vs. union of india (2007) 2 klt733 kumaran chemicals (p) ltd. rep. by its managing partner d. thillairaj and ors. vs. government of pondicherry rep. by the inspector of police manu/tn/0584/2010.13. a contrary view has been taken by high courts of delhi and jharkhand in the following cases: bimla gupta ..... india (2007) 2 klt733 kumaran chemicals (p) ltd. rep. by its managing partner d. thillairaj and ors. vs. government of pondicherry rep. by the inspector of police manu/tn/0584/2010 do not lay down correct law and the view taken by the high court of delhi in abhay tyagi v. state nct of delhi & anr. and asish kumar ..... have retrospective operation, more particularly when the provisions are in the realm of criminal law. he also referred to certain judgments of few high courts wherein such a view has been taken. learned counsel for the respondent-board, on the other hand, extensively relied upon the reasoning of the high court in the impugned judgment and cited certain .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... limitation act, 1963 does not and cannot arise.13. we may, in this case, refer to the pondicherry (laws) regulation, 1963 (no.7 of 1963) which deals with the regulation to extend certain laws to the union territory of pondicherry. reference may also be made to the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968. by virtue of those legislations, the indian contract act, 1872, the transfer of property ..... and separate period of limitation for cause of action arising under the indian contract act and other related laws.14. pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968, as amended, has adopted several such legislations in the state of pondicherry, but the act which governs limitation is the general law of the land that is the indian limitation act. consequently, it is not article 2262 of the french .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... dated 18 july, 2013 indicated ten undertaking points only. the communication dated 22 july 2013 reads thus: -------------------------------------------------------- dated 22.07.2013 to the under secretary law government of pondicherry pondicherry. sir, sub: law college extension of provisional affiliation for the existing law programmes for the academic year 2013-14 reg. the dean, cdc, office received your letter on 19.07.2013. the university inspection committee for ..... so as to enable the university to grant permanent affiliation and the bar council of india to grant extension of approval.24. the file produced by the pondicherry university contained sufficient materials to arrive at a reasonable conclusion that the law department of government of pondicherry remained insensitive to the issues raised by the university and the defects pointed out by various inspection committees .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... ors., (2010) 11 scc 186.godavari sugar mills ltd. vs. state of maharashtra and ors, (2011) 2 scc 43.and t.a. anandan vs. union territory of pondicherry, manu/tn/3319/2009. reasons 11 i have heard the learned counsels for the parties and perused the record. before i venture to discuss the various legal and factual submissions ..... made the payment subject to respondent no.1s decision on the macred issue, ebpl had not made the payment and instead relied upon its communication to respondent no.1 for extension of time. 4.9 evidently, on 16.05.2008, ebpl wrote to respondent no.1 that it was desirous of withdrawing from the tender process. consequently, by ..... failed to perform its obligations in line with the terms and conditions stipulated under the contract. the lis, between the parties, did not arise out of the public law functions of the state but related to contractual obligations obtaining between the parties. the petitioner was not entitled to recovery of money paid in the form of license fee .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... .1989, observing that the sale deed had been executed by thayanayagy ammalle in favour of defendant no. 1 on 16.7.1959, prior to the extension of the hindu succession act to pondicherry on 1.10.1963. the result of the same was that she had sold only her life estate in the suit property, as she was only ..... by the civil court, which held that: a) since kannussamy row had died before the introduction of the hindu succession act, and considering the hindu law applicable in the french territory of pondicherry, after the death of the sole male heir to the suit property, the wife and the mother of the legal heir would have only usufructuary right ..... avoid the multiplicity of the proceedings, and also the loss of revenue of court fees. when the specific relief act, 1877 was in force, the 9th report of the law commission of india, 1958, had suggested certain amendments in the proviso, according to which, the plaintiff could seek declaratory relief without seeking any consequential relief, if he sought .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... 4.1989, observing that the sale deed had been executed by thayanayagy ammalle in favour of defendant no.1 on 16.7.1959, prior to the extension of the hindu succession act to pondicherry on 1.10.1963. the result of the same was that she had sold only her life estate in the suit property, as she was ..... by the civil court, which held that: a) since kannussamy row had died before the introduction of the hindu succession act, and considering the hindu law applicable in the french territory of pondicherry, after the death of the sole male heir to the suit property, the wife and the mother of the legal heir would have only usufructuary right ..... avoid the multiplicity of the proceedings, and also the loss of revenue of court fees. when the specific relief act, 1877 was in force, the 9th report of the law commission of india, 1958, had suggested certain amendments in the proviso, according to which, the plaintiff could seek declaratory relief without seeking any consequential relief, if he sought .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... mr.a.l.somayajee, senior counsel for ms.pushpa menon order defendants in o.s.no.15 of 2011 on the file of the ii additional district judge, pondicherry are the revision petitioners.2. respondents filed the suit under section 92 of the code of civil procedure praying for removal of the present trustees viz., revision petitioners 2 ..... by them either to evict mr.peter heehs, who was residing within the ashram and on the other hand, the revision petitioners herein provided financial guarantee for the extension of stay of mr. peter heehs and also sponsored for his stay in indian and therefore, the revision petitioners were acting against the interest of the trust and therefore ..... do so. if a suit is instituted on the basis of such leave, granted without notice to the defendants, the suit would not thereby be rendered bad in law or non-maintainable. the grant of leave cannot be regarded as defeating or even seriously prejudicing any right of the proposed defendants because it is always open to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
..... hypothecated title papers of the land owned by the company at plot no.a-85 mettupalayam industrial estate, p.i.p.d.i.c. thattanchavady revenue, oulgaret commune, pondicherry with the registrar general of the hon'ble high court of delhi. that after such deposit, mr.munesh kumar, the authorized representative of m/s.asian power controls ltd ..... the appellant has executed a promissory note agreeing to repay the loan together with interest as stipulated. the debt has been acknowledged by the company while seeking an extension of time on 14 august 2009 for the re-payment of the loan until 25 december 2009. a cheque in the amount of rs.50 lakhs issued by ..... the valuation of annuities and future and contingent liabilities; and (c) the respective rights of secured and unsecured creditors; as are in force for the time being under the law of insolvency with respect to the estates of persons adjudged insolvent. under sub-section (2) of section 529, all persons who in any such case would be entitled to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.Nos.1616; 5119 o6. 2-2013 Penmatsa Appala Narasimha Raju and another District Collector,Eluru, West Godavari District and another HEAD NOTE: Counsel for petitioners in W.P.No.5119/2012: Sri C. Ramachandra Raju ^Counsel for petitioners in W.P.No.1616/2012 : Sri K.L.N. Swamy Counsel for respondents (in both the Writ Petitions): Government Pleader for Land Acquisition ?CASES REFERRED:1. 2011(5) AL2. AIR 199.S.C....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... was given a contract of loading / unloading / handling and transportation of food grains at fsd t.v.koil as well as railhead at chinnababusamudram in the union territory of pondicherry. the contract was for a period of two yers from 09.09.2010 to 08.09.2012.2. subsequent to the contract, the petitioner was given an order dated 08 ..... 5. when the matter came up on 12.01.2011, this court admitted the writ petition and granted interim stay for eight weeks. subsequently, the petitioner filed application for extension of the interim order of stay by filing m.p.no.3 of 2011. this court merely ordered notice to the standing counsel for food corporation of india and no ..... above writ petitions and the contempt petition will not dis-entitle the petitioner to move the appropriate forum, if he has got any remedy open to him in accordance with law. nvsri to 1.the general manager (tnr) ro-chennai,food corporation of india no.5/54, greams road chennai-60 2. area manager food corporation of india district .....
Tag this Judgment!