Polluting - Judgment Search Results

Mokha Light House Vs. Central Pollution Control Board

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1995(1)ARBLR540(Delhi); 57(1995)DLT650; (1995)110PLR32

contract entered into between M/s. Mokha Light House, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as 'the Contractor') and Central Pollution Control Board (hereinafter referred to as 'the Employer') relating to construction of Central Boards Building Complex at Shahdara

Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board Vs. Ccl Products (India) Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No 7005 of 2017 Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board Appellant(s) Versus CCL Products (India) Limited Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J12 Admit. This appeal

Delhi Pollution Control Committee versus Lodhi Property Co. Ltd. Etc.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2025]8S.C.R.362

and environmental protection the Boards must have the power and distinction to decide the appropriate action against a polluting entity - It is essential that the Boards function effectively and efficiently by adopting such measures as is

Delhi Pollution Control Committee Vs. National Chemical and PharmA. En ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2001(4)SCALE231

ORDER1. The transfer petitions are allowed. Writ Petition Nos. 3270/1999 and 3596/ 1999 pending in the High Court of Delhi are transferred to this Court. 2. Let the matters be listed in the month of January...

U.P. Pollution Control Board and ors. Vs. Kanoria Industrial Ltd. and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2001SC787; (2003)180CTR(SC)402; 2001(128)ELT3(SC); JT2001(2)SC103; (2001)2MLJ36(SC); 2001(1)SCALE381; (2001)2SCC549; [2001]1SCR559; [2002]128STC26(SC); 2001(1)LC599(SC)

without modifications within three weeks.2. List soon thereafter. Direct Taxation - refund - Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Cess Act,1977 - claim of refund of amount paid by respondent as water cess under provisions of Act

Gujarat Pollution Control Board Vs. Nicosulf Industries and Export Pvt ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (2009)1GLR889(SC); 2008(16)SCALE267; (2009)2SCC171

2.2. A complaint under Sections 24, 25, 43, 44 and 47 of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 (in short the `Act') was filed by the Assistant Environmental Engineer on behalf of the Gujarat

U.P. Pollution Control Board Vs. Dr. Bhupendra Kumar Modi and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2009CriLJ1146(1); 2009(1)CTC84; (2009)2SCC147

the conduct of the business of the company and for their monetary benefits continued to discharge noxious and polluting trade effluent of the company without complying with the conditions of consent and mandatory provisions of law. A

U.P. Pollution Control Board and ors. Vs. Kothari Ferm. and Biochem Lt ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

ORDER1. Heard both sides.2. The petitioner-Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board has challenged the order passed by the Division Bench which permitted the respondent factory to run

A.P. Pollution Control Board Vs. Prof. M.V. Nayadu (Retd.) and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1999SC812; JT1999(1)SC162; 1999(1)SCALE140; (1999)2SCC718; [1999]1SCR235; 1999(1)LC426(SC)

said Board by letter dated 30.7.1997 rejected the application dated 7.4.1997 for consent, stating.(1) The unit is a polluting industry and falls under the red category of polluting industry under section S. No. 11 of the classification

U.P. Pollution Control Board Vs. M/S. Mohan Meaking Ltd. and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2000(1)ALD(Cri)738; [2000]101CompCas278(SC); 2000CriLJ1799; JT2000(3)SC466; 2000(2)SCALE532; (2000)3SCC745; [2000]2SCR566

in this complaint are responsible for constructing the proper works and plant for the treatment of their highly polluting trade effluent so as to conform the standard laid down by the Board. Aforesaid accused persons are deliberately