Police Officer - Judgment Search Results
Police Officers' Association, Adilabad Unit rep. by Its President M.A. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-07-2007
Reported in: 2008(1)ALT772
also to declare the letter dated 12-4-2002 addressed by the 2nd respondent as arbitrary and illegal.2. Petitioner is Police Officers' Association, Adilabad District Unit represented by its President-M.A. Kareem. Respondent No. 1 is the Managing Director of … to declare the letter dated 12-4-2002 addressed by the 2nd respondent as arbitrary and illegal.2. Petitioner is Police Officers' Association, Adilabad District Unit represented by its President-M.A. Kareem. Respondent No. 1 is the Managing Director of United
A.P. Police Officers' Association Vs. the Collector and District Magis ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-31-1980
Reported in: 1981CriLJ641
Class Magistrates that can take cognizance of an offence including one of torture or hurt committed by a police officer and the Judicial Magistrate alone is competent to order investigation under Section 202, Cr. P.C. and the Police … respect of charges against the police of torture or of causing death or grievous hurt.(1) (a) A gazetted police officer to whom complaint of such an offence is made or who otherwise hears of the occurrence should immediately
Liju Abraham vs Joy (CIVIL Police Officer)
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Sep-08-2023
PIN - 689667 BY ADVS. JOHNSON GOMEZ S.BIJU (KIZHAKKANELA) SANJAY JOHNSON JOHN GOMEZ ARUN JOHNY RESPONDENT/S:1 JOY (CIVIL POLICE OFFICER) WORKING AS WRITER IN KURUPPAMPADY POLICE STATION , KURUPPAMPADY, KERALA THROUGH THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Zahir Maksudbhai Vohra Vs. Police Officer in Charge and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Feb-01-2006
Reported in: (2006)3GLR2458
Matched in: Parties Zahir Maksudbhai Vohra Vs. Police Officer in Charge and ors.
Onkar Singh Vs. Police Officers, Prashasan and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-20-1978
Reported in: 1979CriLJ1098
Matched in: Parties Onkar Singh Vs. Police Officers, Prashasan and ors.
Koneru Vara Prasada Rao Vs. State of A.P. Rep. by Sub-divisional Polic ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-22-2007
Reported in: 2007CriLJ2898
order.3. After registration of the crime, the police investigated the matter and charge-sheet was filed by the Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Bapatla. The cognizance of the offences was taken and the case was committed to the Sessions Court for … committed to the Sessions Court for trial according to law. While the Sessions Case was pending, the Sub-Divisional Police Officer, filed a memo on behalf of the prosecution under Section 173(8) of Cr.P.C. requesting to permit further investigation
K. Lakshmipathy Vs. the Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superi ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-24-2012
Police Station was directed to handover the connected CD file of the case to the newly appointed Investigating Officer. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Maniyachi Sub-Division, i/c Kovilpatti Sub-Division, was directed to ensure immediate handing over of … ORDER In this writ petition, the petitioner challenges the order passed by the 1st respondent / Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, dated 02.12.2011. 2. In the impugned order the 1st respondent has stated that the case in
V.Gunasekaran Vs. the Superintendent of Police District Police Office ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-26-2012
in DO No.647/2012 C.No.F1/9901/11 dt 13.6.2012 and quash the same.) The petitioner is employed as driver in the Police department. The Police vehicle bearing registration No.TN 37 G 0273 (Bajaj Tempo Van) met with an accident on … this case. Moreover, the departmental action initiated by the respondent ended in the findings recorded by the enquiry officer that the petitioner was not guilty of the charges. A Division Bench of this Court (2009(3) CTC 388)
Dontharaboina Sadanandam and Others Vs. State Rep by the Sub Divisiona ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-24-2012
P.w.13 is the Civil Assistant Surgeon and P.w.14 is the Mandal Revenue Officer. P.w.15 is the Sub Divisional Police Officer who took up further investigation. At this stage, in support of contention that the conduct of the family … examine the scribe, the same is fatal to the case of the prosecution. P.w.15 is the Sub Divisional Police Officer who took up the investigation in this case. During his cross examination, he stated that the statements of
Atc Telecom Tower Corporation (P) Ltd Vs. the Sub Divisional Police Of ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jul-08-2013
Matched in: Parties Atc Telecom Tower Corporation (P) Ltd Vs. the Sub Divisional Police Officer,
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free